Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans 2008: McCain 30%, Giuliani 26% January 29, 2007
Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & Research ^ | January.29, 2007

Posted on 01/29/2007 7:42:58 AM PST by Reagan Man

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Reagan Man
Ugh. These polls ware worthless. It's all based on name recognition. No one on that list excites me to go and vote for him. None.
21 posted on 01/29/2007 8:06:02 AM PST by MaestroLC ("Let him who wants peace prepare for war."--Vegetius, A.D. Fourth Century)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

(Hint - They like Rudy. Go figure.)

RUDY! did look pretty good in the dress.....:)

The only thing that poll shows is name recognition at this point, no candidate is even coming close to the 50% range so it is basically useless...


22 posted on 01/29/2007 8:09:40 AM PST by padre35 (We are surrounded, that simplifies our problem Chesty Puller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Anyone know if anyone become President that wasn't in the top three at this point?


23 posted on 01/29/2007 8:09:49 AM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
What caught my eye was Newt in 3rd place, ahead of Romney.

Our opponents obviously want clear losers to run and win the primary. Just like we should want Hillary to run.

Do not believe this poll.

24 posted on 01/29/2007 8:10:40 AM PST by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC
...Ugh. These polls ware worthless. It's all based on name recognition. No one on that list excites me to go and vote for him. None...

All true, but the noise about their candidates is "planned" to give the impression, people should not even pay attention to the others.... THEY WILL NEVER MAKE IT...NEVER...NEVER ...NEVER. The more they repeat it, they think they think we'll buy it.

It's so silly really.... we in JANUARY 2007!!! :)

25 posted on 01/29/2007 8:12:51 AM PST by ElPatriota (Let's not forget, we are all still friends - basically :) - despite our differences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Pataki at 2% ???

Why is he even in there. What it says is that they polled 441 New York Democrats masquerading as Republicans.
26 posted on 01/29/2007 8:13:11 AM PST by Ouderkirk (Don't you think it's interesting how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

As Ann Coulter noted in her most recent column, on January 12, 1999 the leader in the New Hampshire primary poll was Elizabeth Dole.


27 posted on 01/29/2007 8:17:53 AM PST by garv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Rudy may have his faults, but he's the only one that I know of, that ever had the guts to stand up to Yassar Arafat.


28 posted on 01/29/2007 8:28:26 AM PST by Carbonsteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Desperately Seeking Freedom

McCain's a Republican? When did this happen?

He became a Republican on the same day that Guili became a conservative.


29 posted on 01/29/2007 8:37:11 AM PST by freedomfiter2 (“No, I have not supported that," Guiliani when asked about a ban on partial birth abortion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Yes, Newt is more a choice of candidate than a Romney but it would be better to see Hunter in Newt's position. I don't see why conservatives would throw their support behind a Newt knowing full well he is a goner in a race like President. Need we be reminded of his hypocritical actions during the impeachment of the old hag's partner in crime? And need we be reminded of Newt's 'name recognition' behind bad? Yet conservatives, Republicans just don't even register Hunter on here and look at all the turkeys on the list! I don't know, but the party is not looking good.


30 posted on 01/29/2007 8:38:54 AM PST by bushfamfan (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRES. 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

What caught my eye was Newt in 3rd place, ahead of Romney.

I think Romney has already peaked.


31 posted on 01/29/2007 8:39:00 AM PST by freedomfiter2 (“No, I have not supported that," Guiliani when asked about a ban on partial birth abortion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bushfamfan

behind=being


32 posted on 01/29/2007 8:39:34 AM PST by bushfamfan (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRES. 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: babaloo

"Where's Duncan Hunter?"

Duncan Hunter? Duncan Hunter doesn't exist. How dare you support a real conservative for president?

That was sarcasm.

The MSM wants to pretend there is no Duncan Hunter in an attempt to marginalize him. Cutting immigration and stemming the flow of capital into China is too threatening to the businesses that put dollar signs ahead of their flag. And to make things worse, supporting traditional marriage and the right to life of the unborn - that's threatening to the Northeastern caviar left.

The media's ignoring him.

Big surprise.


33 posted on 02/01/2007 4:33:24 PM PST by William James
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson