Posted on 01/28/2007 10:29:05 AM PST by paulat
Was 9/11 really that bad?
The attacks were a horrible act of mass murder, but history says we're overreacting.
By David A. Bell
January 28, 2007
IMAGINE THAT on 9/11, six hours after the assault on the twin towers and the Pentagon, terrorists had carried out a second wave of attacks on the United States, taking an additional 3,000 lives. Imagine that six hours after that, there had been yet another wave. Now imagine that the attacks had continued, every six hours, for another four years, until nearly 20 million Americans were dead. This is roughly what the Soviet Union suffered during World War II, and contemplating these numbers may help put in perspective what the United States has so far experienced during the war against terrorism.
[snip]
Has the American reaction to the attacks in fact been a massive overreaction? Is the widespread belief that 9/11 plunged us into one of the deadliest struggles of our time simply wrong? If we did overreact, why did we do so? Does history provide any insight?
[snip]
The people who attacked us in 2001 are indeed hate-filled fanatics who would like nothing better than to destroy this country. But desire is not the same thing as capacity, and although Islamist extremists can certainly do huge amounts of harm around the world, it is quite different to suggest that they can threaten the existence of the United States.
[snip]
Even if one counts our dead in Iraq and Afghanistan as casualties of the war against terrorism, which brings us to about 6,500, we should remember that roughly the same number of Americans die every two months in automobile accidents.
[snip]
So why has there been such an overreaction?
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
What a gross distortion of the truth. Liberals are very good at that. What a strange way of looking at things. It doesnt effect them it doesnt matter too much. Sick cookies.
Hmmm.... Let's see. A terrorist act designed to take out as much of our government as possible is carried out. The same act is designed to disable aspects of our financial system. At the same time, 3,000 people are murdered in the attack--and for all we know they were actually trying to murder 10,000 or so--they just attacked too early in the day.
Hmmm...nope, no overreaction that I notice.
"history says we're overreacting."
We should have waited until the terrorists unleashed some WMD -- nukes or bioterror -- killing millions of people, before reacting. (/sarc)
If Clinton had reacted more strongly after the WTC bombing in 1993, maybe we wouldn't have had 9-11. THe terrorists will keep escalating, if we let them. I can see they are already promoting the new Dem policy -- the pre-9-11 let's keep ignoring terrorism one.
Interesting... It was the LA Times and their liberal leftist media sisters hammering every casualty number in our heads, to show how bad we are losing the war... BLAM ...and now it fits their politcal agenda to tell us, it isn't so bad at all... HYPOCRITES!
We are at war because war has been declared on America
twice by Muslims:
Aug 23, 1996 – formal declaration of war by Muslims against American military.
Feb 23, 1998 – formal declaration of war by Muslims against American population both military and civilian.
Then we were attacked by them on 911.
This is a war between the United States and Muslims.
Why do some people have such a hard time understanding this?
LOLOL!!! Isn't this guy incredible??
I'm sad to say, though, there are many people who think like him....
So now the freak left thinks 3,000 souls killed by terrorists on 9/11 isn't so bad, but 3,000 soldiers killed in Iraq constitutes the worst war in history.
And he also specializes in French history:
david.avrom.bell@gmail.com
Sure, its overblown. That's why everyone in the ME is scared of Iran and why we have to bring carriers into the gulf. Pay attention la la land.
We're in a war. Something always goes wrong in a war, and our military leaders have made mistakes in Iraq. But quitting and leaving would amount to defeat for the U.S. in the global war on terrorism and create chaos. Quitters never win.
Damn all liberals!
Thank God Bush "overreacted" or those hypotheticals the author cites may have indeed happened.
Overreaction ?
I thought we were rather restrained.
Mr. Bell has clearly spent way too much time isolated in his educational surroundings. He's been thinking to much and not experiencing the real world enough.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.