Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boomer doom: Victims of culture of youth
Scripps Howard News Service via KnoxNews ^ | 1/28/7 | LEE BOWMAN, LISA HOFFMAN and THOMAS HARGROVE

Posted on 01/28/2007 8:01:13 AM PST by SmithL

As America's baby boomers approach senior status, a troubling number are dying from causes that have marked the generation since the 1960s - drug abuse, suicide and accidents.

A new analysis by Scripps Howard News Service of death records for more than 304,000 boomers who died in 2003 shows the legacies of early and lingering drug use, a tendency toward depression at all stages of life and a stubborn determination not to "act their age."

All of those problems contribute to more deaths from drugs, suicides and accidents than seen in previous aging generations.

Most of the nearly 78 million Americans born between 1946 and 1964 are still alive and will be for many years. By one Census Bureau projection, in 2050 as many as 780,000 members of the generation that said "never trust anyone over 30" will be at least 100 years old.

But no one, not even members of a generation with a lifelong bent for defying convention, can beat death. Boomers are now dying at a rate of roughly 1,000 a day. The Census Bureau estimates that nearly 21 million will die in the next 25 years.

In the mid-1990s, with the first boomer occupying the White House, the chronic diseases of aging - cancer, heart disease and the new scourge of human immunodeficiency virus - edged out violent death as leading contributors to the demise of boomers as the first wave emerged into their 40s.

Yet the Scripps analysis found that some causes of death once thought to be restricted to the young persist among boomers into a more advanced age.

Scripps used a database of death-certificate records maintained by the National Center of Health Statistics to analyze the causes and nature of death for boomers who died in 2003, the most recent year for which complete records were available.

The causes of death for earlier and later generations were also studied.

The Scripps analysis found that 24 percent of the boomers who died in 2003 did not die of natural causes, and more than one in 10 died from some type of accident.

"The boomers are carrying forward into old age some risky behaviors that they've been living with and dying from since they were young adults," said Dr. Dan Blazer, a Duke University professor of psychiatry and behavioral science specializing in geriatrics.

"It's a bit of a myth that boomers have all figured out how to live a quality and great life. Many of them have problems that earlier generations just didn't bring to old age."

Boomer men accounted for two-thirds of the accidental deaths, 64 percent of drug-related deaths and three-quarters of suicides among their generation.

According to the Scripps study, boomers accounted for about half of all people nationwide who died of drug-related causes in 2003. That is far out of proportion to their 26 percent share of the population. Of the total 28,758 drug deaths that year, 13,901 were boomers. Those numbers do not include impaired driving or other accidental causes indirectly related to drug use.

"Oh, my goodness," the Mutual of Omaha insurance company medical director, Dr. Bruce Henricks, said when informed of the Scripps drug-deaths data. He is one of a handful of national experts on substance abuse and boomer mortality.

The study found that, by far, most of those dying are white males in their mid- to late 40s. Nearly 70 percent suffered accidental overdoses. California, where 10 percent of all boomers live, accounted for 15 percent of the drug deaths, followed by Florida and Texas.

Henricks said the fact that boomers account for one out of every two drug fatalities - and that such a dramatic rate has until now gone largely unnoticed - provides even more evidence that the problem of substance abuse by aging Americans is occurring largely under the nation's radar screen. Because drug-related deaths typically are underreported, Henricks said the true number could be even larger.

One certainty, he and several other researchers say, is that the boomer drug toll will continue to climb in coming years.

According to studies, 1.7 million Americans older than 50 were addicted to drugs in 1999. By 2020, the federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration estimates, that number will soar to 4.4 million.

Add in those not addicted but misusing painkillers and anti-anxiety medicine, plus those mixing alcohol and pills, and what results is an "invisible epidemic." As more boomers enter their "coronary years," even more are forecast to be drug users and to die as a result, Henricks said.

"It's a growing area of concern because it is going mostly undetected," he said.

The upward trend is also being felt by substance-abuse rehabilitation facilities, such as Odyssey House, a New York City nonprofit enterprise that was founded in the early days of the drug culture. Forty years later, it has become one of the few treatment centers nationwide that specialize in older substance abusers.

Peter Provet, a psychologist and president of Odyssey House, says the waiting list to get into its senior-citizen facility is growing by the week. But even as evidence mounts of a looming wave of boomer substance abusers, the nation's predominant focus remains on battling drug abuse by the young.

The same is true for suicides.

The 11,667 boomer deaths classified as suicides in 2003 represented more than a third of the national total, and experts in the field note that the suicide rates have been above the national average at all stages of life since boomers were in their teens.

Although the focus has been on youth suicides, "from a public health perspective, suicide is a greater problem for older Americans, who have consistently higher rates, and aging baby boomers could double those late-life rates in the next 25 years," said Jerry Reed, executive director of the Suicide Prevention Action Network, a Washington advocacy group.

Blazer said many boomers have risk factors that typically make people more likely to attempt suicide.

"Since adolescence, they've been drinking and using more drugs than previous generations. They're less likely to have strong religious beliefs, more isolated, twice the divorce rate of the generation before them, and still facing money and work issues they thought would be behind them in their 60s. This is not going to be an easy period for boomers as they age."

The "forever young" attitude catches up with some as they continue to ride motorcycles and personal watercraft, hang-glide and climb mountains. Accidents of all types claimed more than 31,500 boomers in 2003, more than two-thirds of them men.

When the injuries don't kill them, orthopedic surgeons chalk activity-related accidents among boomers up to "boomeritis" - thought to account for well over 1 million trips to the emergency room each year.

Motorcycles are just one example. The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration says deaths among motorcycle riders over age 40 have more than tripled in a decade, from 541 in 1994 to 1,847 in 2004, often from boomers climbing on high-powered machines either for the first time in decades, or even the first time ever.

Conventional wisdom suggests that boomers will age out of their riskier behaviors to some extent, but experts note that boomers still cling to their cars.

"Our roads, our cars, our buildings, everything is pretty much designed for twenty-somethings, and while many of the boomers coming into their 60s are doing everything they can to stay healthy and not feel old, they need to recognize there are still changes in vision, in reaction time that put them at more risk when they do certain things," said Nadine Marks, a professor of human development and family studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Although the 11,274 boomer deaths from motor-vehicle accidents of all types in 2003 was roughly in proportion to the group's share of the population, recent research suggests that older drivers who are injured in auto accidents are more likely to die from those injuries than are younger drivers.

"So much of our aging research has focused on models of success, of people staying active and healthy," Marks said. "The data on boomer deaths reminds us that not everyone has the same advantages and outlook as they age, and maybe we need to be doing more to support those who fall between the cracks."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: boomers; genx; growupalready
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: johnandrhonda

I say GO FOR IT BABY. You earned it. Like I posted elsewhere, I'd rather die crashing my Porsche or Harley (I'm dreaming because hubby and I own neither), than end up in the nursing home drooling and mumbling.


41 posted on 01/28/2007 9:58:48 AM PST by Paved Paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Another whiny boomer article. I'm a boomer and I hate seeing these self-centered pieces. We should tag them AWBAs!

Just because someone comes up with statistics doesn't mean anything needs to be done about it. So here are a few facts of life for Scripps Howard and we boomers:

1. If you live you will die.
2. When you die it will be because of something.
3. Neither medical nor social science has a cure for "something".
4. As you live you will age.
5. As you age things will change.
6. No science has a way to stop aging.

Those facts of life lead me to these observations;

a. How you live is a personal choice.
b. These choices affect how you will likely die.
c. Personal choices are no one else's business.
d. Medical science needs to get its nose out of people's personal choices.

So, for boomers; make your choices and take your chances.

For medical science; stop trying to influence personal choices and concentrate on caring/curing the sick/injured.

For all; embrace life for it is fleeting!
42 posted on 01/28/2007 10:00:05 AM PST by DakotaGator (Now the boomers are whining because they realize they are mortal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wage Slave

well they sure can't be all lefties... there's our pal right here on FR (seaoflove I think) who is always extolling the virtues and benefits of LSD.


43 posted on 01/28/2007 10:00:24 AM PST by Paved Paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

"According to the Scripps study, boomers accounted for about half of all people nationwide who died of drug-related causes in 2003. That is far out of proportion to their 26 percent share of the population."

Holy cow! And that's even with the meth epidemic that's sweeping today's kids, not to mention crack, ecstasy , oxy and all that. I had no idea.

I bet if this news was more widely reported a lot of today's teens and 20-somethings would be less likely to try drugs. I mean, who wants to emulate some washed-up old hippy?


44 posted on 01/28/2007 10:12:57 AM PST by To Hell With Poverty (If this city were any 'bluer', it'd be spelled 'bleu'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jagman

I am a part of this cohort as well, and you are welcome to speak for yourself.


45 posted on 01/28/2007 10:14:39 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
A "glass half full" reading of the same statistics shows that my generation is dying from natural causes at a much lower rate than its predecessors. I first noticed this at my twentieth and thirtieth high school reunions: except for accidents and Vietnam, the class was virtually unscathed.

The extra deaths cited in this article are among the drug-intensive group. A lot of them ODed spectacularly in their youth, some in the middle of glamorous careers (remember Jim Morrison?), and they are still dying off at a high rate now. I have known a few people with early histories of recreational drug usage who dropped off in their early fifties. But once you factor out this special cohort, we see that the Boomer sense of adventure is leading to longer lives, not shorter.

46 posted on 01/28/2007 10:19:11 AM PST by BlazingArizona (co)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003

Touchy! Just like a boomer!


47 posted on 01/28/2007 10:19:34 AM PST by Jagman (I drank François Rabelais under the table!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Jagman
Admit it, if you are a boomer, by and large we are a generation of whiners!

------------------------------------

Speak for yourself. I am one of nine children, seven of us officially 'boomers'. We have all achieved, we are all successfull parents, none of us will need social security and none of us ever took a dime. Most of the folks I grew up with are the same.

48 posted on 01/28/2007 10:27:08 AM PST by wtc911 (You can't get there from here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

The study found that, by far, most of those dying are white males in their mid- to late 40s....

Thats me....Hey guys check in on me once in a while.


49 posted on 01/28/2007 10:28:31 AM PST by Blackirish (David Dinkins:"Rudy as President is kind of frightening.My question will be, will I move to Bermuda")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jagman

Just tired of simplistic stereotyping. If you and the boomers you know are blots on society, I'm sorry for you, but it does not qualify you to speak for a generation.


50 posted on 01/28/2007 10:29:28 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
I'm afraid you are confusing the personal with the generational. My gripe is with our generation overall. For every person like you, there are probably a thousand or a hundred thousand who embraced the Zeitgeist of the '60s, and still do. And these are the people who have emerged as leaders in our universities, and are the self-loathers who inhabit positions of importance in government and industry.

Sorry, my fear and loathing is of my own generation.

51 posted on 01/28/2007 10:37:01 AM PST by Jagman (I drank François Rabelais under the table!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003
Okay, sorry about the touchy remark.
52 posted on 01/28/2007 10:39:04 AM PST by Jagman (I drank François Rabelais under the table!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Maynerd; SmithL; Tax-chick
"Social Darwinism working its magic and improving the gene pool. "

I was thinking along these lines and regretting the fact that these careless or clueless idiots likely have already had kids.

And then I was cheered by the thought that they probably hadn't!

53 posted on 01/28/2007 10:46:56 AM PST by NicknamedBob (Sign says, "No dogs allowed -- except seeing-eye dogs" Why don't they put that sign down lower?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David
This reminds me of the wag who suggested he hoped to be shot by a jealous husband at the age of 98.

That wasn't me! I've always said 104 years!

Nam Vet

54 posted on 01/28/2007 10:54:15 AM PST by Nam Vet ( The original point and click interface was a Smith & Wesson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

"In the mid-1990s, with the first boomer occupying the White House, the chronic diseases of aging - cancer, heart disease and the new scourge of human immunodeficiency virus - edged out violent death as leading contributors to the demise of boomers as the first wave emerged into their 40s."

Lend me an editor! What sloppy writing, surely the "first wave" of baby boomers were not "emerging into" (oy for that turn of phrase alone) their 40s in the mid-90s.


55 posted on 01/28/2007 10:56:13 AM PST by jocon307 (The Silent Majority - silent no longer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jagman
I cringe to admit I'm part of this cohort. We truly are a bunch of assholes.

Speak for yourself, Batman!

Seriously, there are major numbers of assholes in our little Boomer group. I'm ashamed of a vast number also and have been for decades. People just have to keep in mind that there are quite a few of us who are and always have been Conservatives and have never been a part of the idiocy so properly accredited to Boomers.

Nam Vet

56 posted on 01/28/2007 11:12:25 AM PST by Nam Vet ( The original point and click interface was a Smith & Wesson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Nam Vet

Agreed.


57 posted on 01/28/2007 11:15:19 AM PST by Jagman (I drank François Rabelais under the table!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Jagman
I'm afraid you are confusing the personal with the generational.

____________________________________________

I do not assume the perceived attributes of any group as a way of defining myself.

58 posted on 01/28/2007 11:15:45 AM PST by wtc911 (You can't get there from here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

That's fine, but you're missing my point.


59 posted on 01/28/2007 11:17:23 AM PST by Jagman (I drank François Rabelais under the table!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Jagman

No, I am not validating your point because I don't agree with it.


60 posted on 01/28/2007 11:30:00 AM PST by wtc911 (You can't get there from here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson