It was meant tongue in cheek, now don't read anything sexual into that.
It just would have been nice if a non-prostitute deflowered the young man, someone willing to perform an act of kindness, a "mission of mercy"
why?.....its just an animal act, an animal need.....why a sheep could have done the service and probably for free....
remember that when you're low on money.....
Since it is impossible to discern that from your post, I'll acknowlege this is your explanation for the remark. Tasteless as it remains, as it was certainly sexual in nature from your keyboard.
So it's preferable to you that a woman who isn't a prostitute commit adultery to "service" this young man's "needs".
Since I don't think it was appropriate that ANYBODY perform such a function your hair-splitting about the unfortunate use of prostitutes is perplexing to say the least.
Tell me, would you encourage your daughter or neice to do such a thing? Or your sister?
What if he'd wanted sex with a man, would you want your son to "deflower" this terminally ill man? Be honest please.