That's got to smart!
Posted on 01/27/2007 12:06:48 AM PST by JohnHuang2
In a Newsweek column titled "How Dems can win White House," Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., opines about the difficulties that the Democratic Party has had in defining itself.
The senator wonders, enviously, how Republicans have been able to "identify issues that connected to their deeply held values," reduce them to a few words – eight according to Schumer – and communicate to the American people.
"What are our eight words?" the senator asks.
But Democrats have a very clear picture of who they are. And newly elected Democratic Sen. Jim Webb of Virginia, who his party picked to give their response to the president's State of the Union address, knows his party's message and communicated it clear as a bell.
Aside from the senator's criticisms about the war in Iraq, the entire substance of his thoughts about what is going on in our country was about differences in earnings. Specifically, about the differences in earnings between CEOs and the "average worker." "When I graduated from college, the average corporate CEO made 20 times what the average worker did; today, it's nearly 400 times."
So, Schumer, listen to your newly elected colleague. He has succinctly summed up what your party is about. I call it the politics of envy.
Wealth, of course, is produced by individuals going to work. Not by politicians getting them ticked off that their neighbor is making more than they are.
But the latter is what the Democratic Party is about.
Webb's remarks were an extension of a column he wrote in the Wall Street Journal shortly after he was elected in November. In that column, he talked about our country drifting "toward a class-based system." And then, of course, contrasted minimum wage earners with the "average CEO of a sizeable corporation" who "makes more than $10 million dollars a year. ..."
But do large CEO earnings say that we're now a class-based society? Where do these guys come from?
How about the legendary and recently retired CEO of General Electric, Jack Welch. His father was a train conductor. I think a survey of America's CEOs would show that most of these men, and women, come from middle class working families and got where they are through hard work.
How about Stan O'Neal of Merrill Lynch? O'Neal pulled in a whopping $48 million last year. Somehow, in Webb's "class-based" society, this black man managed to become CEO of this Wall Street monolith.
Here's something about O'Neal's background from a profile in Fortune Magazine: "Raised on a farm in rural Alabama during segregation, he was educated in a schoolhouse built by his grandfather (a man who was born into slavery and whom O'Neal recalls with deep emotion)."
Regarding Webb's claims that most Americans are not participating in our thriving economy, the same Bloomberg news article reporting that Stanley O'Neal's $48 million payday was up 30 percent from the previous year, reported that the "five largest Wall Street firms paid their employees a total of more than $60 billion last year, up more than 32 percent from 2005. ..."
All evidence I see is that Wall Street, a barometer of the nation's health, is booming, that the black grandson of a former slave is running one its largest firms, and that all the employees of the firms there are sharing equally in the boom.
But this message doesn't sit well when envy, that base human emotion, forbidden by the 10th Commandment, is your strategy for grabbing onto political power.
And why is Webb obsessed with $10 million CEOs who actually are producing something (Stan O'Neal is in charge of a firm with 50,000 employees that produces $50 billion in revenue)? Why isn't he concerned about the 42 NBA players who earn more than $10 million? How about the top ten movie stars, all of whom earn well more than $10 million?
Where, of course, the Democrats' politics of envy mindset also takes us is to wonder about how the rest of the world might look at all Americans. The World Bank defines poverty as earning $1 a day. That means that a minimum wage earner in the United States earns 40 times as much as the world's poorest people.
How many people on this planet earn $1 a day? About 320 million. More than the whole population of the United States.
What we need, in this country, and around the world, is freedom and hard work. Not envy.
The problem of the party of Webb and Schumer is not communicating their message. It's having the wrong one.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
bump for later applause.
I like Star Parker. She should write more often.
Oh, he wants a slogan. The liars should be able to come up with some little ditty which of course will be nothing but lies.
Only someone with no class should resort to class warfare. Oh wait! That's James Webb.
Those eight words must be:
How to lose an election by selling out your base
OK, that 10 words, but it's close enough
"No - its the right message. We're too prosperous and need to start getting used to having less so we don't feel guilty about it. That's the Democrats' message. "
I agree. There should be a new section on the IRS form that allows you to put an additional 75% of what remains after taxes into a redistribution of wealth pool. You can use your house, stocks, whatever.
Let's see how many Democrats voluntarily do it.
I read Webb's book, "Born Fighting". He makes a big deal about how poor his grandparents were, how his dad joined the military and worked his butt off, and how he did the same. The whole book was about how you can make it in this country if you want to. What the hell happened to that? Senator Webb doesn't seem to have been hampered by his humble beginnings.
ps. Just about EVERYBODY'S grandparents that lived through the Depression were poor. Why did some people stop being poor? It's rhetorical.
Wonderful, caring, compassionate democrats winning elections over evil, mean, cruel republicans
What else could it be?
I, too, liked about the first 2/3's of the book which gave a different twist on American history than I had ever thought about....the people living in the Appalachians that served as a "buffer" to the wild frontier. However, he did jump the shark by the end of the book....he wandered around his childhood with no clear purpose.
The populist stance that he is taking now is essentially contrary to the central thesis of the book, however. He is bitching about class divisions now, but showed example after example after example of men who had extremely humble beginnings that rose to be the leaders of this country.
Did I not just watch the Gerald Ford funeral and see pictures of his childhood home? Didn't Ronald Reagan's final flight to California on Air Force 1 tip its wings as it flew over his childhood home? Oh, those evil, privileged Republicans! Getting their pictures taken on sailboats with the Kennedy clan. Oh, sorry, that was a young John Kerry...what was I thinking?
Wow.
Rats/08 slogan:We've got what it takes... to take what you've got!!!
Can't say I remember him as Sec.Navy as I was in high school and as my father used to remind me, my head was full of scattersh!t.
What happened to Webb? Simple, he sold his soul to the devil of ambition.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.