Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study sheds light on ER wait times in Ontario
CBC News ^ | January 25, 2007 | Staff

Posted on 01/25/2007 9:56:15 PM PST by mcg2000

Ontarians typically waited one to four hours in the province's emergency rooms over a recent one-year period, although wait times in some larger cities stretched past nine hours, according to a new study.

Half of visits to emergency rooms in small hospitals didn't last longer than 1.1 hours, indicates the study by the Canadian Institute for Health Information.

Half of visits to large hospitals, typically found in big urban centres, lasted between 2.8 and 3.6 hours, the study suggests.

In 10 per cent of cases, a visit to a small emergency room stretched out past 3.2 hours, while 10 per cent of visits to big emergency rooms dragged on beyond 9.3 hours.

The institute based its findings on data from April 2005 to April 2006 at nearly every emergency room in Ontario — 167 in total.

"I think one of the values of this report is that it gives people in Ontario a clear picture of how long people are waiting," researcher Greg Webster told CBC News Online on Thursday, a day after the release of the study.

He said the point of the study is not to judge hospitals or evaluate how their emergency rooms are doing. Instead, the study strives to provide a breakdown of numbers.

Here's how long ER visits lasted:

Large teaching hospitals: Half of ER visits were over in 3.6 hours (10 per cent in 9.3 hours). Large community hospitals: Half over in 2.8 hours (10 per cent in 7.5 hours). Medium hospitals: Half over in 1.5 hours (10 per cent in 4.2 hours). Small hospitals: Half over in 1.1 hours (10 per cent in 3.2 hours). Ontario's biggest hospitals — teaching hospitals that train medical students, and large community hospitals — typically handled more than 30,000 emergency room visits a year. The hospitals are based in cities including Toronto, Windsor, Ottawa, London and Hamilton.

The study looked at 68 big hospitals, which handled 70 per cent of all of Ontario's emergency room patients.

Ontario's medium-sized hospitals, in towns like Brockville, handled between 15,000 and 30,000 visits a year. Small hospitals, in places like Georgetown or Deep River, handled less than 15,000 visits annually.

The study looked at 99 small and medium hospitals.

Worst waits in Toronto, best in London According to the study, Toronto had the worst times in Ontario, with half of people in and out of the ER in four hours, while 10 per cent waited more than 12 hours.

By comparison, in southwestern Ontario, which includes the big hospitals in London, half of patients were out in 1.7 hours, while only 10 per cent waited longer than five hours.

Webster pointed out that Toronto only has large hospitals, which have worst wait times, while southwestern Ontario has a mix of large and small.

The study did not look at reasons wait times were as long as they were, and Webster said there are plans for future studies to determine that.

Bed shortage to blame, doctors say Other reports, as well as medical officials, have suggested that long wait times are due to a lack of acute beds in other hospital departments and nursing homes. This creates a crowding of patients in the ER.

Shortages of nurses, doctors and medical equipment add to the problem.

"Patients are waiting too long to be seen in emergency rooms because of overcrowding and backlogs elsewhere in the system," Dr. Tim Rutledge, of North York General Hospital in Toronto, told the Globe and Mail.

Dr. Howard Ovens of Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto told CBC News that wait times are too long. However, he said that during long waits, patients are getting tests and consultations, and receiving treatment.

"The care process takes time and sometimes to do it better takes more time than to do it quickly," he said.

Doctors do initial assessment quickly Patients might be stuck in the emergency room for many hours, but the wait for an initial assessment with a doctor is not as long, according to the CIHI study:

Teaching: Half of patients seen in 1.1 hours (10 per cent waited more than 3.3 hours). Large: Half in 1.2 hours (10 per cent longer than 3.6 hours). Medium: Half in just under one hour (10 per cent longer than 2.3 hours). Small: Half in 30 minutes (10 per cent longer 1.6 hours). Webster said the good news is that people with urgent medical problems weren't waiting long to be seen.

"It's reassuring that the data does confirm people with the most urgent conditions are treated first, in the shortest time frames," he said.

He hopes the information will be useful to people who run emergency rooms across Ontario.

"We're putting this information out so they can look at this data and see how well they're doing."

Smitherman wants innovative solutions George Smitherman, Ontario's health minister, said much of the waiting can be attributed to a high number of elderly patients, who often have complex symptoms and cannot be treated easily or quickly.

He said Ontario will have to develop innovative ways to find solutions, like care for elderly patients in their own home.

The Canadian Institute for Health Information, with offices across Canada, collects information on health and health care in Canada and makes it available to the public.


TOPICS: Canada
KEYWORDS: healthcare; hillarycare; socializedmedicine; toronto

1 posted on 01/25/2007 9:56:18 PM PST by mcg2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mcg2000
Ontarians typically waited one to four hours in the province's emergency rooms over a recent one-year period, although wait times in some larger cities stretched past nine hours, according to a new study.

I would be surprised if averages for similar sized hospitals in the US were much different.

2 posted on 01/25/2007 10:07:03 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcg2000

If they think that waiting is long now...wait until it is free.


3 posted on 01/25/2007 10:24:37 PM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

It's not. I've waited over 2 hours at least twice in the last 10 years.

Not that I'm accident prone!


4 posted on 01/25/2007 10:29:01 PM PST by bamahead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

During one cold snap a few years ago I broke an ankle, and waited in agony for 8 hours for my 10 minutes with a doctor in Mt. Sinai in Toronto. The strategy these days is, if you have to go to emerg, you set your alarm for 3-4 am and go to an outlying hospital. Our heath care system is circling the drain...


5 posted on 01/25/2007 11:36:07 PM PST by Antioch (Benedikt Gott Geschickt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mcg2000
What everyone here needs to take note of is what is missing: specifically, the chief complaints and acuity of the patients included in the study. It's one thing to say that the waiting times were suc-and such. But when a patientdiddy-bops in with a runny nose, he's going to wait longer than a guy with a lateral wall myocardiac infarction in progress. Sorry about that.

This article is misleading.

6 posted on 01/26/2007 3:01:40 AM PST by 60Gunner (ER Nursing: Saving humanity... one life at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson