Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hawkish Gates Sees More Force as Leverage
nytimes.com ^ | January 22, 2007 | DAVID S. CLOUD

Posted on 01/25/2007 7:43:28 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe

Mr. Gates, it turns out, is a hawk.

In just the last two weeks, he has supported deepening the American military commitment in Iraq, spoken approvingly of sending more troops to Afghanistan and, after dispatching a second American aircraft carrier to the Persian Gulf, declared that negotiations with Iran right now would be futile.

But a hawk may not be all he is. His favorite quotation from history, he told reporters traveling with him this week for meetings with allies and commanders in Europe and the Middle East, is from Frederick the Great, the 18th century Prussian monarch and gifted musician: “Negotiations without arms are like music books without instruments.”

Or, put another way, it takes military power to create the leverage necessary to make negotiations fruitful.

Mr. Gates seems to be hoping that a short-term application of military might can shift the balance of power in the region sufficiently to make eventual political settlements — between Shiites and Sunnis in Iraq, with Taliban insurgents in Afghanistan and even with the ayatollahs in Iran — more plausible for the United States than they appear right now.

It is too early to say whether this new approach will work, or even whether Mr. Gates’s views will ultimately drive decisions in an administration where President Bush himself has rarely shown interest in that sort of strategic thinking.

But there is no mistaking the course change at the Pentagon.

Already there are signs, some large and some small, that Mr. Gates would like to discard assumptions that have dictated how the Bush administration has fought in Iraq.

The most far-reaching of those has been the idea, promoted by his predecessor, Donald H. Rumsfeld, that the American military should be deployed with the fewest number of forces necessary to do the job.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fbifiles; filegate; gates; iran; iraq; oif; vips
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 01/25/2007 7:43:30 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

ping


2 posted on 01/25/2007 7:46:47 PM PST by MagUSNRET (Duncan Hunter for President, 2008!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

One way to take that quote is that once you memorize the music, you no longer need the music books-- you just needs the instruments.

I think the verses of diplomacy are getting pretty repetitive. I dont think we need the music books anymore-- were familiar with what the Iranians will say. Let's watch em dance now.


3 posted on 01/25/2007 7:48:20 PM PST by lonestar67 (Its time to withdraw from the War on Bush-- your side is hopelessly lost in a quagmire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

If Gates knows his Frederick the Great (more than a single quotation) he was a good pick. Let's also hope he knows his Clausewitz, Sun Tzu and Machiavelli.


4 posted on 01/25/2007 7:52:09 PM PST by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
[The most far-reaching of those has been the idea, promoted by his predecessor, Donald H. Rumsfeld, that the American military should be deployed with the fewest number of forces necessary to do the job.]

This 21st Century model was formulated by the Pentagon long before Bush ever took office. Rumsfeld was the first defense secretary willing to force the mossbacks in the officer corps into changing or leaving.
5 posted on 01/25/2007 7:57:18 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee (Anything a politician gives you he has first stolen from you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
As opposed to the media/Democrat theory that less force gives you leverage, I suppose....

Actually I take that back, they don't believe that less force gives us leverage. They simply don't want us to have leverage.

6 posted on 01/25/2007 8:03:24 PM PST by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MagUSNRET

Notice the negative tone used by the author regarding the surpising "hawkishness" of Gates....and yet, the author STILL has to imply that GATES is the one with plans that Pres. Bush would NEVER have thought of....LOL

Starts out as a hit piece on Gates' hawkish bent...and still has to dig at Bush..


7 posted on 01/25/2007 8:10:49 PM PST by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; onyx; Bahbah; Mo1; Peach

PING


8 posted on 01/25/2007 8:13:49 PM PST by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Frank fan
>>>They simply don't want us to have leverage. <<<

Leverage is evil. Weakness is strength.

9 posted on 01/25/2007 8:15:11 PM PST by HardStarboard (The Democrats are more afraid of American Victory than Defeat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

We had posters here who said that Gates wasn't up to the job.


10 posted on 01/25/2007 8:16:59 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

bump -- always the dig at POTUS.


11 posted on 01/25/2007 8:20:56 PM PST by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
I'm liking it ... maybe we'll warm up to him. But, still it won't be like

Miss ya, Rummy.

12 posted on 01/25/2007 8:25:18 PM PST by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

What, you mean that announcing that the military option is off the table before negotiations is NOT the way to gain strategic advantage? Herr Schroeder and Monsieur Chirac are wrong? How can this be?


13 posted on 01/25/2007 8:30:48 PM PST by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

I know...I don't discount anything Rummy did....but we know that the NYTimes isn't going to say anything nice about him.

If he still has an office at DOD and has security clearance..we may never know what he is still doing.


14 posted on 01/25/2007 8:31:06 PM PST by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Mr. Gates, it turns out, is a hawk.

So what? The NYTimes is on record as being for cut-n-run.

15 posted on 01/25/2007 8:33:42 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

I think I remember just after his leaving was announced that W was going to continue to have him as consultant. And, I really can't imagine that they wouldn't be in regular communication after all they know and have been through together.


16 posted on 01/25/2007 8:33:42 PM PST by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Negotiations - arms

Carrot - stick

Names may change but the reality stays the same.


17 posted on 01/25/2007 8:43:45 PM PST by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Or, put another way, it takes military power to create the leverage necessary to make negotiations fruitful.

One imagines the flamboyant fellows at the NYT assuming postures of histronic dismay at this obvious truism.

18 posted on 01/25/2007 8:47:26 PM PST by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Gates is a hawk?? Only when viewed by the parakeets and parrots at the NY Times.... (no offense meant to lovers of those birds).

Why does this photo make me think of the typical NY Times editor? All red and yellow:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Parrot.red.macaw.1.arp.750pix.jpg


19 posted on 01/25/2007 8:49:08 PM PST by Enchante (Chamberlain Democrats embraced by terrorists and America-haters worldwide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

I remember the day I realized the new SecDef wasn't the weak James Baker - type person that he was billed as. It was such a relief.


20 posted on 01/25/2007 8:54:34 PM PST by pacelvi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson