Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Bush Justice rolled over for Sandy Berger
Family Security Matters ^ | 1-25-07 | Jack Cashill

Posted on 01/25/2007 10:58:20 AM PST by windchime

As I watched these events unfold two years ago, I presumed that the Bush DOJ chose not to exploit these stories for reasons of national security. Although seemingly unrelated, both of these stories lead to the same larger secret, a secret that Berger risked his career to conceal, a secret that if revealed had the potential to destabilize the nation during a time of war.

As I have since learned, however, the Bush White House is not fully in control of its own Justice Department and FBI. In truth, the decision to protect Berger may have more to do with saving the Clinton legacy than with stabilizing the nation.

(Excerpt) Read more at familysecuritymatters.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: berger; clintondocuments; clintonistas; corruption; govwatch; sandyberger; sandyburglar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-195 next last
Second of a three part series.
1 posted on 01/25/2007 10:58:21 AM PST by windchime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: windchime
Video:  Pitfalls of Berger Polygraph  (scroll down page to 'Before the Bench')
2 posted on 01/25/2007 10:59:33 AM PST by windchime (I consider the left one of the fronts on the WOT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: windchime

It's called "Greymail".

It was first used back in the early 1980s, IIRC, as part of a criminal's defense. He threatened to defend himself on the stand by revealing certain goobermint secrets.

The courts ruled that a defendant could not publically expose confidential material in public, so closed trials were ordered and the transcripts edited or sealed.


3 posted on 01/25/2007 11:04:47 AM PST by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: windchime

bookmark


4 posted on 01/25/2007 11:04:51 AM PST by AmeriBrit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: windchime
Recent FreeRepublic Threads:

Why I Never Should Have Had Sandy Berger on 'The Big Story'
foxnews.com ^ | 12/21/06 | John Gibson

Sandy Berger: What Did He Take and Why Did He Take It?(Sandy Burglar)   Real Clear Politics ^ | January 15, 2007 | Ronald A. Cass

The secret for which Sandy risked his all .... (remove documents from Mr. Clarke's files)    WND-January l8, 2007  Jack Cashill

Lawmakers Want Polygraph of Berger Over Stolen 9/11 Documents
Fox News ^ | 1-22-07|

5 posted on 01/25/2007 11:05:20 AM PST by windchime (I consider the left one of the fronts on the WOT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: windchime

Washington needs to be renamed, Washingtoon, CYA.


6 posted on 01/25/2007 11:06:21 AM PST by JayAr36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: windchime

And why hasn't Bergler been indicted??? Why should a Rat get preferential treatment???

It is BS about secrets being protected. The NY Times seems to have the ability to access any secret that makes Bush look bad. So why is it that other so called secrets involving the DemoRat operatives get a free pass???

Something is pretty stinky here.


7 posted on 01/25/2007 11:08:07 AM PST by o_zarkman44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

Thanks for the term, 'Greymail'.

It looks like there are ways to get to Berger without jeopardizing confidential material. Check out the video.


8 posted on 01/25/2007 11:10:53 AM PST by windchime (I consider the left one of the fronts on the WOT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JayAr36

And Berger and the Clintons have large ones to cover.


9 posted on 01/25/2007 11:12:45 AM PST by windchime (I consider the left one of the fronts on the WOT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44
Something is pretty stinky here.

It's called the U.S. Government. Especially the Clinton appointed part of it (though I can't but help notice that Bush IS the President of the United States now, and could probably get this taken care of, if he wanted to).

10 posted on 01/25/2007 11:13:17 AM PST by badbass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: windchime

-bflr--


11 posted on 01/25/2007 11:13:45 AM PST by rellimpank (-don't believe anything the MSM states about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44

Cashill's articles have some interesting theories.


12 posted on 01/25/2007 11:14:57 AM PST by windchime (I consider the left one of the fronts on the WOT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: badbass

I'm sure all will be revealed when they are all dead. I hope to be alive to hear it.


13 posted on 01/25/2007 11:15:30 AM PST by flynmudd (Proud Navy Mom to OSSA Blalock-DDG 61)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: badbass
--yep--this is one of the understatements of the year-- --"Bush White House is not fully in control of its own Justice Department and FBI."--
14 posted on 01/25/2007 11:16:02 AM PST by rellimpank (-don't believe anything the MSM states about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: badbass

GWB and his administration need to have more of a mean streak, IMO.

You can bet the current president and members of his administration will have to deal with a lot of persecution and vindictive acts if a Dem wins the presidency in '08.


15 posted on 01/25/2007 11:16:28 AM PST by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44
And why hasn't Bergler been indicted???

What would the new charges be?

As I understand it, he's already been tried, convicted, and sentenced. I'm not an atty, but I don't think he can be re-charged or re-sentenced - unless it was something new.

This whole thing really stinks and he'll be back in for Klintoon in '08.

16 posted on 01/25/2007 11:18:03 AM PST by GoldCountryRedneck ("Idiocy - Never under estimate the power of stupid people in large numbers" - despair.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44
It is BS about secrets being protected. The NY Times seems to have the ability to access any secret that makes Bush look bad. So why is it that other so called secrets involving the DemoRat operatives get a free pass???
And why is Bush going along with this? Somewhat like the Palestinians, Bush never misses an opportunity to miss an opportunity.
17 posted on 01/25/2007 11:20:30 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GoldCountryRedneck

As the media would like us to believe, he has been tried and convicted. But I don't recall any court appearances related to stealing classified documents, which is the crime in question here.
The concealment of classified documents in ones pants and the removal from the archives is strictly prohibited under law, regardless of careless intent.


18 posted on 01/25/2007 11:23:58 AM PST by o_zarkman44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44
And why hasn't Bergler been indicted??? Why should a Rat get preferential treatment???

Republicans are always much more concerned to protect Democrats afflicted by scandals than they are worried about protecting Republicans.

19 posted on 01/25/2007 11:25:16 AM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: windchime

For later.


20 posted on 01/25/2007 11:26:47 AM PST by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-195 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson