Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Pipes took the subject of the debate more seriously, pointing out that although he and Livingstone agreed on the evils of terrorism

Do they? I wonder. I also suspect they would have a difference of opinion as to just who the terrorists are.

1 posted on 01/25/2007 7:31:12 AM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Valin

My thoughts exactly. Daniel Pipes certainly seems to me to understand completely who they are...so I tend to dismiss any debate with a socialist like Livingstone or any leftist out of hand if they think they need to debate Daniel Pipes.

I feel that socialists/leftists do not have the best interests of the free world in mind, so why listen to them?


2 posted on 01/25/2007 7:35:21 AM PST by rlmorel (Islamofacism: It is all fun and games until someone puts an eye out. Or chops off a head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Valin

The Muslims, of course, realize that in the event they are victorious, the lefties won't pose much in the way of difficulties.


3 posted on 01/25/2007 7:40:44 AM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Valin

Daniel Johnson had an excellent report on this in today's NY Sun. Perhaps someone could post this.


6 posted on 01/25/2007 8:05:22 AM PST by joylyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson