Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Related article in the current issue of Aviation Week and Space Technology.

The "how" of the program is highly classified but the "what" is known in general terms -- break into an enemy's air, land, or sea deployed sigint and weapons systems, monitor, and in later versions, take control of equipment as an active "system manager".

The magazine article mentions a metaphor of making the enemy radar think it's a wash machine and putting it into rinse mode!

These capabilities apparently are tested in realistic flight situations, utilizing multiple specialized aircraft, although deployment is in the early stages with some data acquisition components already employed in Iraq.

The Suter aircraft evidently project multiple digital signal beams into the antennas and other electronic components of the enemy platform to probe and then set up an ad-hoc network, similar to what a "hacker" would do to a target computer on the Internet using ordinary TCP and IP data packets. The nature of the signal beams, however, is a highly guarded secret, but apparently involves some kind of synthesis of the different signals and dynamic adjustment to deal with changing conditions and countermeasures.

1 posted on 01/24/2007 6:54:12 PM PST by steve86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Head

Ping. Familiar with this?


2 posted on 01/24/2007 6:54:55 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alas Babylon!; American_Centurion; An.American.Expatriate; ASA.Ranger; ASA Vet; Atigun; Ax; ...
MI Ping

Another "No Comment" thread.

3 posted on 01/24/2007 7:00:56 PM PST by ASA Vet (The WOT should have been over on 9/12/01.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash
"are now considered the military's most closely guarded projects"

Who's doing the "guarding"?

8 posted on 01/24/2007 7:12:36 PM PST by 2111USMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash

bump


9 posted on 01/24/2007 7:13:10 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash
I always got a kick when there was a big media story about Chinese hackers and cyber-security and cyber-war stuff and the stories were always written like in awe of them and were very ominous.

A good hacker is like a good virus... if they know its there, you're screwing up.

I'm confident we have capabilities far beyond what this article describes.
10 posted on 01/24/2007 7:13:34 PM PST by FreedomNeocon (Success is not final; Failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts -- Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash

Loose lips sink ships.


12 posted on 01/24/2007 7:16:21 PM PST by TommyDale (If we don't put a stop to this global warming, we will all be dead in 10,000 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash
I wonder if this is why the N Koreans had so much trouble firing their missiles?
13 posted on 01/24/2007 7:21:12 PM PST by garjog (Used to be liberals were just people to disagree with. Now they are a threat to our existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash

That we can read enemy radar screens was revealed by the govt as long ago as the Korean airliner shootdown.


14 posted on 01/24/2007 7:24:58 PM PST by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash

Is everyone here tired from The State of the Union last night? I expected a Skynet joke within the first ten posts.


16 posted on 01/24/2007 7:28:14 PM PST by Better Dead Than Red (Davis College Republicans (Best Party on Campus))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash
USAF can take control of enemy missile launchers

Now imagine if we could take control of that launched missile and re-direct it back towards the offending country. That would be so neat and so demoralizing to our enemies. Who knows, perhaps we already have that capability. Likewise, we need to make all of the enemy aircraft and tanks inoperable, or at least controlled by us, once a war is declared.

The next thing we need to work on and that's needed now is to cause the IEDs that are killing our soldiers in Iraq to explode in their faces as they're being set up.
19 posted on 01/24/2007 7:34:42 PM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash; Paleo Conservative

BTTT


27 posted on 01/24/2007 7:42:43 PM PST by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash
These capabilities apparently are tested in realistic flight situations, utilizing multiple specialized aircraft, although deployment is in the early stages with some data acquisition components already employed in Iraq.

Now just exactly how much enemy radar and sophisticated battlefield management computing do you think we are facing in Iraq?

28 posted on 01/24/2007 7:42:44 PM PST by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash

All Your Radar Are Belong To Us


30 posted on 01/24/2007 7:42:59 PM PST by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Wing; Dog Gone; Shermy; blam

ping


41 posted on 01/24/2007 8:21:23 PM PST by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash
The Suter aircraft evidently project multiple digital signal beams into the antennas and other electronic components of the enemy platform to probe and then set up an ad-hoc network, similar to what a "hacker" would do to a target computer on the Internet using ordinary TCP and IP data packets. The nature of the signal beams, however, is a highly guarded secret,
Smoke ... but no mirrors yet ...
44 posted on 01/24/2007 8:36:53 PM PST by _Jim (Highly recommended book on the Kennedy assassination - Posner: "Case Closed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash
Could they not just fly over and maim communication in Iran for a decade or two.
53 posted on 01/24/2007 9:26:56 PM PST by alrea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash
Unless the integrated system is running in a fully automated mode, it will never work. The TO still has to physically press the FIRE NOW button.
63 posted on 01/25/2007 3:55:47 AM PST by semaj (Just shoot the bastards! * Tagline not suitable for children under 12, Void where prohibited)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash

Bump for later reading


66 posted on 01/25/2007 9:33:42 AM PST by Kevmo (Darn, if only I had signed up 4 days earlier, I'd have a 3-digit Freeper #)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash

"EC-130 Compass Call, RC-135 Rivet Joint "

I flew on both of these airframes from 94-98.


67 posted on 01/25/2007 10:29:44 AM PST by xusafflyer (Mexifornian by birth, Hoosier by choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash
And people wonder why Adama wouldn't allow networked computers aboard Galactica. Wireless netcracking is how the Cylons won the war!
71 posted on 01/26/2007 9:33:42 PM PST by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson