Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Publius
One of the problems that I have seen with the current conflict is that we did not have an actual nation, or group of nations, declare war on us or attack us with uniformed military formations (like Japan did).

Being able to "Name the Enemy" is important; in this case, Naming the enemy, unless you're willing to call it "Islam" or even "Radical Islam" is difficult, and it becomes a "War on Terror" which makes as much sense as calling the war against Japan a "War on Naval Aviation".

But nobody asked me about it at the time :)

23 posted on 01/24/2007 4:53:35 PM PST by ExGeeEye (Thanks, non-R voters, for the next two years. Hope it's only two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ExGeeEye; GarandGirl
That response by the American people was squandered by the lack of an effective propaganda campaign by our leaders...

...it becomes a "War on Terror" which makes as much sense as calling the war against Japan a "War on Naval Aviation".

The two of you have the key. From the beginning the term “War on Terror” made no sense, but we didn’t want to antagonize all Muslims – including our own homegrown Nation of Islam. (Who needs a fifth column at home?) But if you can’t say the enemy’s name, how can you fight him, much less win?

We had quite a bit of propaganda, much of it painfully accurate, as to the mind set of our enemy. But the media began a slow but steady campaign to make the connection to Vietnam, and it worked.

29 posted on 01/24/2007 5:31:22 PM PST by Publius (A = A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: ExGeeEye
Twice in its history, the US has declared war without naming a nation or nations as the enemy. The first time was two centuries ago, when Congress authorized President Jefferson to use "military force" across "international boundaries" against the Barbary Pirates.

The second time was in 2001 when both Houses of Congress passed a Joint Resolution for President Bush to use military force against the terrorists, and "any nation harboring them." The language is very similar to what Congress said two centuries prior, in dealing with the other Muslim threat.

The point is, it is valid to declare war without naming another nation. It has been done before. But unfortunately, almost no politicians or reporters are aware of the history of the prior event under President Jefferson.

Congressman Billybob

Latest article: "Nathan Hale Died for a Dumb Nation"

58 posted on 01/25/2007 1:51:58 PM PST by Congressman Billybob (Please get involved: www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson