[LanPB01]

It would be a lot more convincing if the actual testimony was available, rather than the word of someone who has a vested interest in the case (the prosecutor). Still, I suppose this is as good we have at this point.

[1rudeboy]

The defense attorneys are perfectly capable of providing trial transcripts to the public and press if they choose to continue their efforts to exonerate their clients. The U.S. Attorney's Office is probably busy working on other cases that have not concluded.

[1rudeboy]

It would be a lot more convincing if the actual testimony was available, rather than the word of someone who has a vested interest in the case (the prosecutor).

The above statement troubles me. We have the U.S. Attorney's Office stating to what Compean and Ramos tesitified. Are you suggesting that it's a lie? If so, their defense attorneys are clearly incompetent, and the U.S. Attorney committed a felony.

[Pelham]

FrontPage Magazine might fit your desire for an impartial source:

http://www.nbpc.net/ramos_compean/frontpagemag.htm