[1rudeboy]

It would be a lot more convincing if the actual testimony was available, rather than the word of someone who has a vested interest in the case (the prosecutor).

The above statement troubles me. We have the U.S. Attorney's Office stating to what Compean and Ramos tesitified. Are you suggesting that it's a lie? If so, their defense attorneys are clearly incompetent, and the U.S. Attorney committed a felony.

[LanPB01]

I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest to read a statement from a prosecutor or a defense attorney in which they've slanted words in their favor, so I wouldn't be surprised if the testimony that press release refers to doesn't actually say what the U.S. Attorney says it does. The fact that the defense attorneys haven't released relevant portions of the trial transcript to counter that statement would lead me to believe the U.S. Attorney is telling the truth, though.

[calcowgirl]

We have the U.S. Attorney's Office stating to what Compean and Ramos tesitified. Are you suggesting that it's a lie?

Gross misrepresentation would be a kind description.

[TBP]

We have the U.S. Attorney's Office stating to what Compean and Ramos tesitified. Are you suggesting that it's a lie?

Could very well be.