Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bipartisan? Goodbye
The Sun Herald ^ | January 23, 2007 | STEVEN THOMMA

Posted on 01/24/2007 2:23:48 AM PST by mcg2000

WASHINGTON - George Bush tried to go home Tuesday night.

His goal was what he thought he left behind in Texas when he was a Republican governor with a Democratic legislature. But the mythical bipartisan place he tried to reach out to in his State of the Union address Tuesday was never like the one he romanticized in Texas. It's not what he's built in six years in Washington. And today it's as elusive as Oz.

"We can work through our differences," Bush said hopefully Tuesday.

He spoke the language of cooperation, singling out four big issues on which he and Democrats both want action: education, energy, health care and immigration.

But his proposals were mostly familiar, and on energy, notably small-bore. There's little prospect that either he or the Democrats will shed their mistrust of each other, or that they'll compromise enough to find genuine agreement, with the possible exception of overhauling the nation's immigration policies.

"They're difficult issues. They're ones that have been attempted to solve in the past and have come up short," White House counselor Dan Bartlett said Tuesday. "We go into this process with no illusions about the atmosphere in which we're operating in."

Bush wanted to convince Americans watching on television that he's heard them and that he wants again to work with Democrats.

"Our citizens don't much care which side of the aisle we sit on," he said, "as long as we're willing to cross that aisle when there's work to be done."

Yet the chasm between the parties is wide and deep, the politics between them are poisonous and Bush bears much of the blame.

After reaching out to Democrats his first year, Bush governed after the 2001 terrorist attacks as the leader of a one-party state.

In Congress, his party locked Democrats out of negotiations, then hammered votes through without chance of input.

From the White House, Bush tacked "signing statements" onto bills he signed and used the threat of terrorism in three successive elections to attack Democrats as weak or, worse, aiding the enemy. Last fall he warned that if the Democrats won control of Congress, "terrorists win and America loses."

That makes it hard for Democrats to take his olive branch Tuesday without looking for thorns.

Democrats, too, share responsibility for the nation's polarized politics. These aren't the go-along, get-along, conservative Democrats that Bush ruled with in Texas.

"Dangerously incompetent," was the way Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., described Bush during last year's campaign. "A loser," he said another time.

Then there's the Iraq war.

Bush didn't spend the entire speech on the Iraq war, a political loser on which he's alienated virtually all Democrats and even many Republicans in Congress.

And it might not matter.

He said he's sending more troops to Iraq regardless of what the Democrats, the Congress or the country thinks.

The Democrats signaled in response that they're not in the mood for compromise either - on Iraq or at home. They want Bush to get U.S. troops out of Iraq and shift the government away from the wealthy and toward the poor.

"If he does, we will join him," said Sen. James Webb. D-Va., who gave his party's formal response to Bush's speech. "If he does not, we will be showing him the way."

'Sen. Jim Webb of Virginia, delivering the Democrats' response


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; sotu; stateoftheunion

1 posted on 01/24/2007 2:23:49 AM PST by mcg2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mcg2000
Bipartisan is an OK concept, as long as you realize it is mostly a horse manure Bromide. Both sides want to cut each others throats and now the Dems see the President on the ropes. They can't resist any more that a shark can resist blood in the water.
2 posted on 01/24/2007 2:38:06 AM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcg2000

Screw bipartisanship. I'm sick of Republicans thinking they have to be nicey-nice to every soulless repugnant America-hating individual in Washington.


3 posted on 01/24/2007 2:41:39 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcg2000

One can't play nice with rabid animals.


4 posted on 01/24/2007 2:55:55 AM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcg2000

Given the way that "The Hammer" Delay dealt with Democrats when Republicans had the majority, I can't say that I blame them for not wanting to play nice with our boys now.


5 posted on 01/24/2007 2:58:44 AM PST by Zeroisanumber (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcg2000
We need to contact every wishy washy Republican....

And give them a stern.....warning...
6 posted on 01/24/2007 3:13:14 AM PST by alaskamomma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcg2000

Let me be one of the first to call for an end to this one-sided faux bipartisanship, wherein Democrats get to kick the GOP in the teeth, and Republicans search their souls wondering which of their four cheeks they can turn to next.

Let the full range of legal, political, economic, social and cultural weaponry we have in our arsenal be brought to the front, where the Leftists have long been utilizing theirs.

It can't be any worse for the country than what's been happening with Republican/Conservative appeasement.


7 posted on 01/24/2007 3:13:47 AM PST by guitfiddlist (When the 'Rats break out switchblades, it's no time to invoke Robert's Rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcg2000

President Bush, you won't criticize Dems, even as they plot to overthrow you.

You always want to be nice.

How's it working for you?

Have you figured it out yet?


8 posted on 01/24/2007 3:16:58 AM PST by Stallone (Strangulation: RINOs Are Taking Triangulation Politics To A New Level)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcg2000
Try some more "new tone". It has worked well so far.

< sarc>

9 posted on 01/24/2007 4:09:33 AM PST by SIDENET (Everybody was kung-fu fighting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson