To: cripplecreek
Better yet, make it Foreign Free Oil.
5 posted on
01/23/2007 2:06:57 PM PST by
FearlessFreep
(Excuse me. But are those your legs or are you riding a chicken?)
To: FearlessFreep
That would be the way to go but I still wonder what we would really be getting.
6 posted on
01/23/2007 2:07:38 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
To: FearlessFreep
Better yet, DRILL IN ANWAR for crying out loud.
7 posted on
01/23/2007 2:07:43 PM PST by
yobid
(A world without Islam is a world with peace)
To: FearlessFreep
"Better yet, make it Foreign Free Oil."
I agree.
12 posted on
01/23/2007 2:16:37 PM PST by
Osmium
To: FearlessFreep
14 posted on
01/23/2007 2:21:05 PM PST by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: FearlessFreep
Better yet, make it Foreign Free Oil. Sure, that could be done. However, you would have to establish a entirely new infrastructure of exploration, production, transportation, refinement and distribution.
By the time you are done gas would cost $20.00 a gallon.
With today's petrochemical infrastructure it would be impossible to not have Middle Eastern or foreign oil in everyone's gas tank.
43 posted on
01/23/2007 3:44:57 PM PST by
trumandogz
(Rudy G 2008: The "G" Stands For Gun Grabbing & Gay Lovin.)
To: FearlessFreep
"Better yet, make it Foreign Free Oil."
Does that include BP? BP owns most of Alaska's North Slope oil. Another past atrocity...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson