Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum, Boxer exchange defined partial-birth debate
Baptist Press ^ | 01/19/07 | Compiled by Michael Foust

Posted on 01/23/2007 12:09:40 PM PST by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: FreedomNeocon
Whats your beef with Santorum anyway... you a troll or a casey staffer or something?

typo. Read about 3 posts up.

21 posted on 01/23/2007 1:44:41 PM PST by The Blitherer (I am not worried about the deficit. It is big enough to take care of itself. -Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNeocon
I'm a Santorum fan (see typo correction). But he faced an impossible situation: The son of a former governor, running as a Democrat on a Republican platform, when his party had tremendous momentum. That's why I wouldn't discount Santorum if he chose to run, or was added to a ticket. He went up against a political perfect storm and he lost. I have no doubt that he would carry his home state as a VP candidate. That being said, I am going to trust Casey on abortion until I see otherwise. There are a lot of Republican candidates that I would like to see out of office ahead of him.
22 posted on 01/23/2007 1:47:49 PM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Senator Barbara Boxer.

A baby is born when it is outside the mother's body.

"That tend on mortal thoughts,unsex me here

And fill me from the crown to the toe top-full of direst cruelty!"

Act one.Scene five. Macbeth. Lady Macbeth speaks.(William Shakespeare).

23 posted on 01/23/2007 1:51:08 PM PST by Peter Libra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Namyak
Because the one blemish on his record, supporting Specter, was too much for them to bear. They were going to punish this bastion of conservativism, and they did. They showed him. They showed us too. Now we have Casey, who is far better Senator representing our interests in the Senate.

That is complete barbra streisand and you know it. Conservatives didn't punish Santorum for supporting Specter by staying home on election day. The liberals and the democrat vote fraud machine in Philly and Pittsburgh turned out in full force. Squishy independents/undecideds leaned toward Casey, who ran as a conservative democrat.

24 posted on 01/23/2007 2:12:28 PM PST by VRWCmember (Everyone is entitled to my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
If you want to see otherwise, just scroll up to the top of this page. There is a news story re Casey addressing the pro-life advocates in D.C. today. He refused to say that he would only support a pro-life candidate for POTUS 2008.
25 posted on 01/23/2007 2:13:12 PM PST by ishabibble (ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952

Hilarious.


26 posted on 01/23/2007 2:18:26 PM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ishabibble
If you want to see otherwise, just scroll up to the top of this page. There is a news story re Casey addressing the pro-life advocates in D.C. today. He refused to say that he would only support a pro-life candidate for POTUS 2008.

Uh, yeah, I posted it. You just didn't bother reading everything I said.

That being said, I am going to trust Casey on abortion until I see otherwise. There are a lot of Republican candidates that I would like to see out of office ahead of him.

Would I prefer to have Santorum in office? Of course. But I am just happy we got a guy who may vote with us on this issue. Of course he is going to support his own party's candidate for president. Olympia Snowe is an across the board pro-abortion Eastern Orthodox Republican senator who will probably endorse whatever candidate we put up there. Who would you prefer?

27 posted on 01/23/2007 2:20:34 PM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
I would prefer Rick Santorum!!!
28 posted on 01/23/2007 2:22:34 PM PST by ishabibble (ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Namyak

Oh, gee, yah, supporting Specter is such a huge sin, who's pro-choice, but supports most pro-life judges, that we'd rather have a guy who's pro-life in theory, but won't vote for pro-life judges.

Brilliant.


29 posted on 01/23/2007 2:24:42 PM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ishabibble

Unfortunately, that is not going to happen. That being said, as I believe I pointed out earlier in this thread, I have no doubt that he would carry his home state as the VP candidate. Remains to be seen if his character has been irrevocably damaged around the rest of the country, where voters are not as familiar with him.


30 posted on 01/23/2007 2:27:07 PM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

I'm just repeating in jest what many people on this site said at the time: that they could not forgive Santorum for supporting Specter. I don't necessarily agree with that argument, since I place Santorum's lose at the feet of the media for their numerous manufactured scandals which pushed the independents towards Casey.


31 posted on 01/23/2007 2:38:34 PM PST by Namyak (Oderint dum metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Namyak

Glad to hear your comment was in jest. I'm getting very tired of the "thanks for staying home and teaching the rest of us a lesson" comments regarding the election. The dems won the majority through a combination of scandals, media cheerleading for liberals, and resultant shift in the "independents" to vote for dems. Overall, I suspect the "stay at home conservatives" were extremely few in number and had minimal impact on the balance of power in either house.


32 posted on 01/23/2007 3:04:02 PM PST by VRWCmember (Everyone is entitled to my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Bump for later reading


33 posted on 01/24/2007 11:20:20 AM PST by Kevmo (Darn, if only I had signed up 4 days earlier, I'd have a 3-digit Freeper #)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson