Posted on 01/23/2007 9:34:01 AM PST by Mia T
THE PUNDITS AND POLS ARE ASKING THE WRONG HILLARY! QUESTION...
|
HILLARY "I'm in" CLINTON'S 'CONVERSATION' WITH HERSELF
|
... While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times.
These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real.
Defeating the enemy isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary--(an image, incidentally, that is only enhanced today by her clumsy, termagant parody of Thatcher), forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration."
It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief." |
December 7, 1941+64
AN OPEN LETTER TO AMERICANS
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton
Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.
The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive.
We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will?
In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst?
Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival.
What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.
COMPLETE LETTER |
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2007
;)
still LOL'ing at "red Klingon power jacket" bump
the truth is funnier than fiction ;)
excellent. bump.
chris matthews et al called her a liar. matthews said it foreshadows a campaign of lies. Will post the clip later.
"Tell me you're not staying in tonight?
I thought we'd go to Gabriel's for tiramisu?"
If the Democrats can ride the hem of her peticoat to victory, they don't care that she is a psychopath. I have no doubt that Reid, Pelosi, Durbin, et al are fully aware of her and her husband's mental pathologies, but don't give a whit. The overriding motivator is the capturing and retention of power.
What petticoat?... What victory? ;)
The point I was trying to make is that half of the Ds don't think she can win... and the other half prefer themselves to her. ;)
I'm not so sure about the uniform validity of Rush's lockbox theory. Last nite, Chris Matthews et al called missus clinton a liar re her timing claim. Will be posting video later....
Missus clinton is a documented congenital liar and the media know it. They are not about to be snookered by her.
Great, Mia. Keep up the fabulous work!
thank you, Miss Didi :)
;)
oops. sorry.
not sure I have the answer. did you check with apple?
CHRIS MATTHEWS: EARLY INDICATOR OF HILLARY CLINTON'S LACK OF CANDOR
-- LET'S BE BLUNT --
Thanks, Mia. Afraid I'll have nightmares now, so I'll watch it in the morning.
(I had a hard time with my breakfast after that performance.)
bump
thanx :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.