That would be from a degree in engineering and an understanding of basic chemistry and physics.
it's a well known fact that the more vaporized the fuel is, the better it will burn
Faster, yes. What does "better" mean? But if you burn vapor in the combustion chamber you get the changing of items #1 and #3 above without capturing #2.
You don't want liquid fuel for optimum efficiency.
In an internal combustion engine, yes you do for the reasons listed above.
And you misunderstood my point about the oil companies reformulating the gas so it would take alot more heat to vaporize it
No, you don't understand what the term vapor pressure means.
Just out of curiousity...do you work for an oil company?
No I don't, but I often work in that industry.
Your lack of knowledge is a little perplexing to me
The lack is on your part. You ignore what actual happens in the engine. Go back and actually read what I wrote. The parts you don't understand go look up in an actual science publication instead of a conspiracy theorist web site.
I thought you might want a laugh this morning.
I understand you have alot of knowledge about engineering but you have been taught wrong on the vapor point. Everything I have researched from a wide variety of sources says that you want the fuel to be vaporized to get the most power and mpg's. And the evidence is there for anyone to see that with varous inventions that have proved it which for some strange reason you deny. O well, hope you will open your mind a bit. And again, my application of at least partial vaporization with my old plymouth proved it as well with over 100% mpg improvement with excellent performance. I'm not making that up and have no reason to...I actually did it using an inventors plans that were sold to the public.