Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney

I understand you have alot of knowledge about engineering but you have been taught wrong on the vapor point. Everything I have researched from a wide variety of sources says that you want the fuel to be vaporized to get the most power and mpg's. And the evidence is there for anyone to see that with varous inventions that have proved it which for some strange reason you deny. O well, hope you will open your mind a bit. And again, my application of at least partial vaporization with my old plymouth proved it as well with over 100% mpg improvement with excellent performance. I'm not making that up and have no reason to...I actually did it using an inventors plans that were sold to the public.


60 posted on 01/26/2007 9:56:59 AM PST by fabian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: fabian
You won't discuss the science of why you think this works. Why is that? You admit that the change of liquid to vapor expands the volume but you claim it needs to happen before the combustion chamber. The combustion chamber is the ONLY place in an engine that converts the energy of the expansion of gases into mechanical motion.

Decades ago a guy at work bought a new car. He bragged about how great his mileage was, and as it got broke in, the mileage was astounding. This guy was such a jerk his co-workers were adding about a pint a day to his tank until the first time he took it in for service. Then they quit. He hounded the dealership and GM for months about what they did to his car, threatened lawsuits, etc. It was rather hysterical, kind of like your claims.
61 posted on 01/26/2007 10:06:29 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson