Skip to comments.
CLINTON DESTRUCTION OF STAN LEE MEDIA WILL STOP HILLARY -- see you in court, Witch
Peter Paul collection ^
| 1-21-07
| dfu
Posted on 01/22/2007 10:30:19 PM PST by doug from upland
Hillary will be in court this year in Los Angeles, either as a defendant or a witness. Her husband is a defendant. Paul v Clinton is an historic lawsuit. Although the mainstream media will have to be dragged kicking and screaming, they are going to have to cover the trial. Four false FEC reports and Hillary's lying declaration will finally be known to the voters.
YOUTUBE - HOW THE CLINTONS COLLAPSED STAN LEE MEDIA
Peter gave over $1.6 million in-kind to Hillary's 2000 campaign because of Bill's promise to come to work for Stan Lee Media for one year. Instead, Bill's business advisor, slimy Jim Levin (a strip club owner and on the Clinton Lie-brary board) used proprietary info to steal SLM's Japanese business partner. They recorded the agreement with Levin and Tendo Oto (with Bill as silent partner) in Illinois just six days after her Nov. 2000 election. SLM had a serious cash crunch in Nov. 2000. When Oto's 5-7 mil did not come into the American company as promised, SLM company collapsed. Investors lost 100 mil in the public company thanks to the interference of the Clintons. This witch is going down.
Oto's intentions:
Oto invested $5 million in the joint venture in Japan.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hillary; peterpaul; stanleemedia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
To: wafflehouse
41
posted on
01/23/2007 12:48:20 AM PST
by
wafflehouse
(When in danger, When in doubt, Run in circles, Scream and Shout!)
To: uscabjd
And if the Reps lost, who would you rather have as pres, Clinton, Edwards or Obama? Frankly, I'd take Clinton. I wouldn't.
Hillary is the most dangerous of the group. She has way too much power already. The others are lightweights and don't know how to manipulate things in Washington, like Clinton does. Giving Hillary the Presidency would mean she would have a lot more power at her disposal to further her wicked, liberal agenda, and she would use it too.
To me, it's as simple as ABC: Anybody But Clinton!
42
posted on
01/23/2007 1:01:00 AM PST
by
wai-ming
To: RightOnline; doug from upland
Doesn't a thread like this tip some hands to 'em in a big way? Witnesses, evidence, etc.? I may be way off, but just..........have to ask. The other side does watch the enemy. When her royal theighness is backed into a corner, the "I don't recall" defense won't work!
43
posted on
01/23/2007 1:11:33 AM PST
by
Las Vegas Dave
(HDTV ping list, please FReepmail me if you would like your name added.)
To: doug from upland
Re: 'This witch is going down.'
If referring to Her Ankleship, you need to check you spell-checker...
44
posted on
01/23/2007 1:12:17 AM PST
by
Bender2
(Nancy P needs to spend a few weeks with her supporters in Tehran...)
To: doug from upland
"The witch has set up her own daughter for perjury."
Nah...All she is going to say it "I don't recall".
45
posted on
01/23/2007 1:23:02 AM PST
by
Revel
To: msnimje
LOL - Mrs. Clinton raise your right hand - and then we'll chat under oath!
47
posted on
01/23/2007 2:27:09 AM PST
by
Enterprise
(Drop pork bombs on the Islamofascist wankers. Praise the Lord and pass the hammunition.)
To: doug from upland
48
posted on
01/23/2007 3:13:23 AM PST
by
sure_fine
(*not one to over kill the thought process*)
To: doug from upland
Th thing about it is thaty the clintons think nothing of perjuring themselves, in other words, the truth, unless it helps them means nothing to a clinton.
Neither the legal system nor the American public believe that a clinton committing perjury is of no consequence a/k/a "No big deal."
49
posted on
01/23/2007 3:22:41 AM PST
by
sport
To: kcvl
Patrick Fitzgerald on the case? I guess this is where the sand got thrown in his eyes.
50
posted on
01/23/2007 4:24:45 AM PST
by
gusopol3
To: doug from upland
I just got an email from the NYTimes on how it intends to cover this story...
Times 3.12.83 reporting bb dayorder doubleplusungood refs unperson rewrite fullwise upsub antefiling
51
posted on
01/23/2007 4:33:31 AM PST
by
6SJ7
To: doug from upland
I watched the judge make it very clear to David Kendall that he will entertain no motion that removes Hillary from testifying. He then looked at Kendall and said --- "Did you hear that, Mr. Kendall?"Excellent.
52
posted on
01/23/2007 5:18:30 AM PST
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
To: Mrs Zip; BOBWADE
53
posted on
01/23/2007 5:33:09 AM PST
by
zip
(((Remember: DimocRat lies told often enough become truth to 48% of all Americans (NRA)))))
To: Proud_USA_Republican
The MSM can try to bury it, but they won't be able to.You are underestimating the MSM. Look at what is happening to Berger.
To: doug from upland
The trial will never happen. Sorry.
To: zarf; doug from upland
Hey, they finally got Capone with tax evasion :)
56
posted on
01/23/2007 7:04:16 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: pabianice
I agree, this will NEVER get in the mainstream, and if it does, it will be a 10 second blip on sunday morning at 4am.
NOTHING will be shown of it, and if it is, it will be blamed on a witch-hunt by the right wing.
It will be spun into "more right wing, unfounded attacks against the motherly mrs. clinton and her aging well respected husband" and the public will eat it up.
To: uscabjd
Let's deal with them one at a time. Hillary is an excellent place to start.
58
posted on
01/23/2007 7:38:19 AM PST
by
twigs
To: doug from upland
FreeRepublic is the ONLY media outlet where I hear about this case. What does this say about the 'reporting' in our country? If this were ANYONE in the Bush administration, from deputy janitor on up, we would have weekly reminders. This is what scares me about where our nation is right now. Believe very little of what you see in 'tha whirld newz tanite'.
59
posted on
01/23/2007 7:41:45 AM PST
by
AD from SpringBay
(We have the government we allow and deserve.)
To: You Dirty Rats; XJarhead
60
posted on
01/23/2007 7:42:06 AM PST
by
GoldwaterChick
(Never give in, never give in, never, never, never give in. Winston Churchill Oct. 29, 1941)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson