Posted on 01/22/2007 9:24:35 AM PST by Delphinium
Even though God's judgement may be severe against this country, the souls of those that believe in Him and keep His commandments will be saved.
"It is a monstrous thing that we live in a society which elevates the destruction of babies in the womb to the level of a constitutional right."
Bingo. Unfortunately, this practice has been around for centuries.
I know we will be saved, but don't you hate to see it going down around you. My daddy's family fought indians in New York state hundreds of years ago for this country. I just hate seeing this happen.
I share the writer's concerns. I don't expect some overt act of God necessarily, although that's always His option, but more the consequences of Him withdrawing His protection. And those consequences come slowly enough that few can put 2 and 2 together.
Early on, many were taken in by the "when does life begin" fuzzy argument - and I believe that even the Roe opinion stated that if it were ever shown to be an actual human life, the opinion would become invalid. Medical technology has shown just that, but the practitioners of this barbaric sacrament have by now become so entrenched that they will not be moved by much of anything humans can bring to bear on them.
Seems to me I heard that Barack Obama even voted to deny medical care for those babies who survive an abortion.
How deprived of human decency can there be?
There can be no defense for this slaughter of the innocence.
So the ACLU is now going to ferociously defend people who want to homeschool or keep their kids from having to attend certain garbage programs in public schools? What frauds!
The article in itself is a dichotomy in relation to other issues the left spews about. Government invading the privacy of the home - yeah, right!
The heart of their argument is that "the decision whether and when to become a parent is among the most private a person can make"
That "private" moment the female decided to spread her legs is when she decided to become a parent.
' "the decision whether and when to become a parent is among the most private a person can make," that we must "keep the government out of your home and out of your decisions about the way you raise your family," and that our society must protect "a woman's right to choose and control her own reproductive destiny." '
There are plenty of ways one can "control [one's] reproductive destiny" without committing abortion. There are no restrictions birth control, nor on abstinence. Of course, the abortion lobby hates to even have abstinence taught to preteens. It's odd to talk about "controlling destiny," anyway, since destiny usually connotes something beyond one's control. But the abortion lobby wants us to think no one can control their own behavior, so they have to kill the innocent victim of that behavior.
A great piece by Brian Fischer. Thank you for posting it.
To American babies, the threat from terrorists pales in comparison to the threat from the Planned Barrenhood knives.
Your title alone is spot-on. And we should! I sometimes wonder if Revelation 19 is speaking of the US. The big clue is the ship captains, as they watch "Tarshish" burn say, "Now who is going to buy all our stuff?".
I'm only writing this because of so many posters either don't know scripture or write faster than they think. To be saved, one only has to "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved." Commandments are really cool but they don't save anyone.
Hey, Planned Parenthood - So if I'm a parent today, and decide *not* to be one tomorrow, it's ok to kill my toddler?
If not, why not?
After all, I'm only deciding "when and whether" I'd like to become a parent and/or childless.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.