Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bert
So? If it takes a Hilldebeast administration to pull this nation's collective head out of its collective a**, I say bring it on. Its obvious our nation didn't learn the lessons of 9-11, or of an 8-year reign of terror under the first Klintoon administration, and its obvious the GOP didn't learn the lessons of this last election. If it takes another Communist in the WH, another congressional spanking, or another attack (much worse than the first) on our nation, I say let it happen today. I'm not into prolonging agony. A quick bullet to the head is much better than a slow, painful death by poisoning.

Sooner or later we've got to quit thinking in a two-party political box and find leaders who will lead us back to the plan our Foundihng Fathers laid out for us. Either that or we will cease having a country at all.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

115 posted on 01/21/2007 8:02:10 AM PST by wku man (Claire Wolfe's "awkward time" is quickly coming to an end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: wku man

My view is that you don't understand our system.

We tolerate all views and to accomodate the diversity and allow any one that can come up with support and money to participate. This is done within the loose organization of two parties. Each attracts coalitions of common agendas. The coalition with the greatest support gets nominated in the primary.

What you propose is rather backward and is practiced by the small and third world democracies where there are multiple parlimentary coalitions that must find a majority post election to rule. They continuously screw up and don't succeed very well.

In America there have been lots of efforts such as you suggest but they are mostly hot air and no substance. They always fail and they always will fail.


139 posted on 01/21/2007 8:55:54 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. .... It's spit on a lefty day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

To: wku man

My view is that you don't understand our system.

We tolerate all views and to accomodate the diversity and allow any one that can come up with support and money to participate. This is done within the loose organization of two parties. Each attracts coalitions of common agendas. The coalition with the greatest support gets nominated in the primary.

What you propose is rather backward and is practiced by the small and third world democracies where there are multiple parlimentary coalitions that must find a majority post election to rule. They continuously screw up and don't succeed very well.

In America there have been lots of efforts such as you suggest but they are mostly hot air and no substance. They always fail and they always will fail.


140 posted on 01/21/2007 8:56:02 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. .... It's spit on a lefty day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson