Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brownback for President: What are his chances?
Brownback home page ^ | Jan. 21, 2007 | Sam Brownback

Posted on 01/21/2007 3:08:26 AM PST by wai-ming

I have decided, after much prayerful consideration, to consider a bid for the Republican nomination for the presidency.

I am running to spread hope and ideas. We are a blessed nation at an important crossroads. War, corruption, disintegrating families, and for some, hopelessness, tear at the American Dream. We need hope and ideas.

I am running for America…to be of service in a crucial time of trial.

Ours is an exceptional nation. A nation between two oceans made up of people from every nation on earth. A great nation united by our ideals. But we are a great nation because of our goodness. If we ever lose our goodness, we will surely lose our greatness.

We believe in a culture of life—that every human life is a beautiful, sacred, unique child of a loving God.

We believe in justice for all—at all times.

We believe in liberty.

But the central institutions that best transmit these values—the family and the culture—are under withering attack.

We must renew our families and rebuild our culture!

We need to revitalize marriage, support the formation of families, and encourage a culture of commitment.

(Excerpt) Read more at t-worx.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: brownback; president; senatorlaraza
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last
Brownback announced his candidacy today, in the shadow of Hillary's media blitz.
He appears to be a conservative on many issues. Yet, he opposed the troop surge in Iraq.

What do you think?
Is Brownback a viable candidate? What are his chances of winning?

1 posted on 01/21/2007 3:08:29 AM PST by wai-ming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wai-ming

Zero.


2 posted on 01/21/2007 3:10:21 AM PST by manapua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wai-ming

He is maneuvering himself into the evangelical middle by being pro-life and not wanting to be seen as too militaristic and too hostile to illegal immigration.

He seems to be in the same pond as Huckabee from Arkansas who has the advantage of being an ex-governor.

I still see outsiders (governors, mayors) as preferred candidates over senators-congressman who are part of the problem. Voters seem to prefer govs over senators-incumbents in recent presidential elections.


3 posted on 01/21/2007 3:14:55 AM PST by Nextrush (Chris Matthews Band: "I get high....I get high.....I get high....McCain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manapua

Nil.

The media has this all set up, these are the canadiates they are going to give postitve coverage:

Hillary
Obama
McCain
and Rudy

those are the choices we will be given.

Remember how the media built up and then destroyed Howard Dean?

They are still very powerful.


4 posted on 01/21/2007 3:15:00 AM PST by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wai-ming

nada...

Lets put it the logical way if you oppose the President taking action against the greatest threat of our generation. Then in fact you side with the Democrats who are only opposing Bush because he is a Republican and have made the GWOT a Partisan political battle.. so in fact it makes you a RINO... So that is exactly what Brownback is.


5 posted on 01/21/2007 3:15:36 AM PST by tomnbeverly (Democrats have vowed to dance a political fandango with the diabolical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wai-ming

Sam Browneye is a sacrificial lamb. As Morris has said, the base is too stupid to nominate a real candidate such as Giuliani, so a "minor league" putz with no chance will likely get the nod and give Hillary a 15 pt win.


6 posted on 01/21/2007 3:15:45 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wai-ming

Who?


7 posted on 01/21/2007 3:19:07 AM PST by Walkingfeather (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wai-ming

Don't like his stance on illegal immigration. At all.

He's just Bush all over again. Maybe worse.

I'm really tired of the complete absense of Republican candidates who are both fiscally and socially conservative.

You'd think these were the people who would pursue politics, but it hasn't been the case. There couldn't be a bigger disconnect between the American people and our leaders as there is on this issue.


8 posted on 01/21/2007 3:20:42 AM PST by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CheyennePress

Brownback is also part of the Stalinist wing of the Republican party: a big government nanny-stater.


9 posted on 01/21/2007 3:23:50 AM PST by manapua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wai-ming

None.

Brownback rhymes too closely with Wetback.
That was my first thought, no other reason.


10 posted on 01/21/2007 3:25:56 AM PST by GRRRRR ( What's Next? - Bring on the ChocoCity Saints..Bears LOVE Chocolate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manapua

He talks tough on spending and has voted for some substantial cuts.

But there are examples to the contrary, too. He's more fiscally conservative than a lot of very strong social conservatives, but I'd like to see him stronger in that department, too.


11 posted on 01/21/2007 3:28:52 AM PST by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wai-ming
He probably has more name recognition than Bill Clinton did in 1991. So his chances are as good as anyone.
12 posted on 01/21/2007 3:38:50 AM PST by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wai-ming
So that his why he has been stabbing the President in the back. I wouldn't vote for him.
13 posted on 01/21/2007 3:45:09 AM PST by Ninian Dryhope ("Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers." The inestimable Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wai-ming
zero. the guy stabbed the president in the back and our troops and gave aid and comfort to the dems /terrorist party.
14 posted on 01/21/2007 3:59:39 AM PST by BurtSB (the price of freedom is eternal vigilance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manapua

Zero seems a little high to me.


15 posted on 01/21/2007 4:00:34 AM PST by brooklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wai-ming
If he ever got close to knocking off one of the top tier Republicans (McCain, Giuliani or Romney), the media would hang the fundamentalist label around his neck every chance they got. Look how much they mention Romney being a Mormon right now. That's to scare the evangelicals, and they would be happy to scare the country-club Republicans the same way.

The MSM knows that in order to win, either Hillary or Obama needs to have a fractionalized Republican electoral base come November, 2008.

16 posted on 01/21/2007 4:07:13 AM PST by hunter112
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wai-ming

What are his chances? Slim to none. The only issue he might be trusted on is pro-life.


17 posted on 01/21/2007 4:41:39 AM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wai-ming
What are his chances?

Very poor.

18 posted on 01/21/2007 4:42:54 AM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wai-ming
Is Brownback a viable candidate?

No. And here's why:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1765606/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1636601/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1611892/posts

19 posted on 01/21/2007 4:46:29 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hunter112
either Hillary or Obama needs to have a fractionalized Republican electoral base come November, 2008.

So far that looks to be a pretty solid bet to happen. We have so far no candidates without glaring vote-repellers in their makeups.

20 posted on 01/21/2007 4:47:20 AM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson