Skip to comments.
How much is too much child support? Mom asks court for $28K a month
The Atlanta-Journal Constitution ^
| 01/21/07
| BETH WARREN
Posted on 01/20/2007 6:33:55 PM PST by FreedomCalls
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
A lot of people raise two kids quite well on $28,000 a year.
To: FreedomCalls
2
posted on
01/20/2007 6:35:23 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: FreedomCalls
If he can afford a gold sink then he can surely afford 28K a month in child support.
I'm still shaking my head in disgust at the gold sink....does it emit holy water as well.
To: FreedomCalls
F. Scott Fitzgerald said it: The rich are not like you and me.
They are way crazier. I said that.
4
posted on
01/20/2007 6:37:37 PM PST
by
trimom
To: FreedomCalls
Hey if dad is making 1 cool million a month, 28K is not a lot to ask. The children are entitled to have the same sort of perks as dad, including a nurse called Mom.
5
posted on
01/20/2007 6:37:41 PM PST
by
Chickensoup
(If you don't go to the holy war, the holy war will come to you.)
To: Chickensoup
if the money will go to the kids but this is not...its going towards mommys shoe collection
6
posted on
01/20/2007 6:40:24 PM PST
by
skaterboy
To: Chickensoup
The children are entitled to have the same sort of perks
child support payments have apparently been going towards her $600,000 home in south Atlanta, splurging on designer clothes, cruises without the kids and a tummy tuck. She also spent thousands of his money on a Steinway piano, as well as private school tuition and diamonds for her oldest child, a teenage daughter from a previous relationship.
I don't think that the 6 yo's are the ones getting the perks
7
posted on
01/20/2007 6:43:41 PM PST
by
grjr21
To: FreedomCalls
Love to see fat-cat lawyers, making out of wedlock babies, getting it stuck to them. Wouldn't doubt that he's made it on the other side of the coin.
8
posted on
01/20/2007 6:43:46 PM PST
by
RightResponse
(It depends on what the defamation of Islam is .....)
To: Chickensoup
That is the hardly the point. The point is "child support", not a lifestyle comparable to their father's. Like the liberals do with taxes, this woman wants a certain (huge) percentage of her ex's income for herself, in the name of child support. ("It's for the children")
To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball
One 'the' too many in the first sentence.
To: FreedomCalls
"Gary's attorneys said he was willing to pay $14,000 a month until he found out Gowins had stopped putting money into a college fund for the twins and was instead spending much of the cash on herself"
WORTH REPEATING..."spending much of the cash on herself"
This is what happened TO ME for 17 years !!
I have and am distraught about my money that was suppose to be going for raising my only Daughter was only a little slice of what I was paying.
My EX didn't (and still doesn't) supply my 19 year old Daughter with her own Bedroom !!
Then, after it was to end per Law, my EX not only tried to extend it, but RAISE it - after it was suppose to end !!
Thank God I stood up for myself (LIKE A GOOD FREEPER...) and brought it up to District Court and Won.
11
posted on
01/20/2007 6:47:33 PM PST
by
LiveFreeOrDie2001
(They're "Terrorists" and they want to KILL YOU !!!)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
If he can afford a gold sink then he can surely afford 28K a month in child support. Sure he can afford it, but what's the point of paying it of it's not going towards child support but instead is, quote:
"going towards her $600,000 home in south Atlanta, splurging on designer clothes, cruises without the kids and a tummy tuck. She also spent thousands of his money on a Steinway piano, as well as private school tuition and diamonds for her oldest child, a teenage daughter from a previous relationship."
And there's this:
Gary's attorneys said he was willing to pay $14,000 a month until he found out Gowins had stopped putting money into a college fund for the twins and was instead spending much of the cash on herself.
12
posted on
01/20/2007 6:50:20 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
If he can afford a gold sink then he can surely afford 28K a month in child support.That's not the point. The goldigging b!tch wants a lifestyle. Period. Two kids at 28k is nuts.
13
posted on
01/20/2007 6:53:18 PM PST
by
buccaneer81
(Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
To: FreedomCalls
Like the saying goes...don't do the crime, if you can't do the time, or somthing like that.
The guys is married and this is the price he has to pay for a few good orgasms!
So she got a tummy tuck, after having twins it's a necessaty.
As for being a stay at home mom to 6 year olds, yes,it's still a full time job until their in late high school.
14
posted on
01/20/2007 6:54:39 PM PST
by
LAChicka
To: FreedomCalls
I remember about 10-12 years ago when Suzanna Cooke divorced Jack Kent Cooke and went to court several times to complain about the child support she was getting. If I remember right, he paid for school and not much else--maybe $2k a month and then not even that after everything was put into the trust. It was ugly. Suzanna complained she couldn't even afford riding lessons for the tot. Tragedy indeed as they lived in horse country, VA.
BTW, both names, Suzanne and Jacqueline are pronounced with an "ah" where the 'a's are -- as in SuzAHnAH and JAHk-leeene. Gotta pronounce them correctly or Suzanna would be annoyed.
To: Chickensoup
Actually, I think it's way below the guideline and should be close to $280,000 a month for 2 kids.
To: FreedomCalls
If they are worried about her big spending habits .. then take the difference and put it in a trust fund for the kids
17
posted on
01/20/2007 6:55:54 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Mrs. Bill Clinton - "We're going to take what you have and give it to others for the common good.")
To: LAChicka
...a few good... O-k!
TMI - don't remind me.
18
posted on
01/20/2007 6:57:06 PM PST
by
LiveFreeOrDie2001
(They're "Terrorists" and they want to KILL YOU !!!)
To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball
Like the liberals do with taxes, this woman wants a certain (huge) percentage of her ex's income for herself, in the name of child support. ("It's for the children") But she isn't an ex ... she is a mistress
19
posted on
01/20/2007 6:58:01 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Mrs. Bill Clinton - "We're going to take what you have and give it to others for the common good.")
To: FreedomCalls
Here's a picture of his private jet.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson