New York Times Gets Another Story Very Wrong - This Time it’s about Marriage

LifeSiteNews ^ | January 19, 2007 | Peter Smith

[GMMAC]

PING!

[mockingbyrd]

interesting but so not surprised.

[rusty millet]

Good post - nice catch.

[GMMAC]

Thanks.
On the general subject of msm non-veracity, also see:
Report on Reuters actions after publishing altered photographs (corporate statement)
(in particular my post #11 on the New York Slimes' history of agenda-driven lies & omissions)

[lesser_satan]

The NYT prints lies? Who knew?

What's that you say? They won a Pulitzer for Duranty's blatant fabrications about Stalin's crimes against humanity, and never gave the prize back in disgrace? Oh, never mind.

[Cicero]

Good one. I didn't read the Times story closely, so I didn't catch any of this, and evidently other Freepers were fooled, too.

We all know that the culture has a lot of rot. Good to know it isn't as bad as the Times would like it to be. No doubt every new divorce delights them.

[Nathan Zachary]

What I don't understand is why anyone even bothers to buy this waste of forrest resources. It's been evident ever since the The Great Famine in the Ukraine that the NYT's is biased and only prints what it's owners want the public to believe, not truth.

[Aetius]

Exactly

[richlk]

Latest findings by experts show, in terms of accuracy, The National Enquirer now leads The New York Times.

[Old Professer]

I don't think it is fair to say that we here were fooled as much as it is pertinent to remember that this site now has a zealot for every fashionable non-mainstream notion to come down the pike and to argue with this sort serves only to prove the admonition against arguing with a fool.

If we are guilty of anything, at least we old-timers, it is being polite to a fault allows for fictions to become factoids.

[Old Professer]

"What I don't understand is why anyone even bothers to buy this waste of forrest resources.

A lack of Gumption?

[Frwy]

If the NYT was free I wouldn't read it. I mean, why bother? Everything in it is either a lie or suspect.

[Calpernia]

Lying Media

[GMMAC]

In my view, if one hasn't read Robert Conquest's "Harvest Of Sorrow" and "The Great Terror", it's debatable if they should even be calling themselves a conservative.

note: that date was intentionally chosen to
commemorate the fall of the Berlin Wall

[bjc]

One has to wonder if even the ball scores in the NYT are accurate!

[Diogenesis]

Chief Judge Anthony Lewis-Margaret Marshall(S.Africa, Democrat, NewYorkTimes, SJC-Massachusetts):
"Anyone who dares contradict the findings of my husband's New York Times
or his Boston Globe shall receive thirty days jail in civil contempt."

[A. Pole]

Bump

[Diddle E. Squat]

fyi

[Young Scholar]

A little bit of hyperbole, maybe?