To: Dallas59
But the world's top polluter, the United States..
Is it alright if I remain a wee bit skeptical of this little missive??
This guy better be careful or the "scientific" community will draw & quarter him for heresy.
5 posted on
01/19/2007 11:12:28 PM PST by
kb2614
(Hell hath no fury than a bureaucrat scorned)
To: kb2614
>> But the world's top polluter, the United States..
That's like complaining about an earth-mover using more fuel than a guy with a wheel barrow.
To: kb2614
That's an outright falsehood. The world's top polluter is *CHINA*. Can't that get through their thick heads ? We got clean engines, catalytic converters, and scrubbers on our smokestacks. In China it rains sulphuric acid or worse, and there's a brown cloud over most of China and India caused by the burning of manure for fuel. The primary cause of death in China is pulmonary disease, caused by pollution or government supported smoking.
15 posted on
01/19/2007 11:49:33 PM PST by
farlander
(Strategery - sure beats liberalism!)
To: kb2614
I'm sending this article's URL to all my friends.....
This is what this non-scientist (Me) has suspected all along.
Now to figure out what the motive of the Libs is....in encouraging junk science?????
18 posted on
01/19/2007 11:52:04 PM PST by
Halgr
(Once a Marine, always a Marine - Semper Fi)
To: kb2614
Yep, the article was going well until that point. I guess the PRC's numerous coal fired plants which now pollute the US skies don't count.
26 posted on
01/20/2007 12:46:15 AM PST by
Left2Right
("Democracy isn't perfect, but other governments are so much worse")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson