Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AppyPappy
The pornos will never allow it because people will be able to block access to the sites.

But the article attributes the opposition to conservative pro-family groups.

I would favor the idea enthusiastically if there could be some way to require that all pornographers to register under the .XXX domain name. As you said, that would give people an easy way to block porn sites.

6 posted on 01/19/2007 11:39:21 AM PST by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Logophile
I would favor the idea enthusiastically if there could be some way to require that all pornographers to register under the .XXX domain name. As you said, that would give people an easy way to block porn sites.

I'm certain that such a TLD-based requirement would be struck down as unconstitutional, based on the previous rulings. But a law requiring porno sites to be restricted to a numerical range of IP-addresses might stand a chance. It could be a sort of IPv6 "red light district" that could be blocked efficiently.

35 posted on 01/19/2007 1:45:56 PM PST by HAL9000 (Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson