Skip to comments.Lobbying backlash could hit bloggers
Posted on 01/18/2007 10:38:32 PM PST by Nachum
A bill that Senate Democrats have touted as a means to curb corruption in Washington could instead target some political bloggers with new regulations and even criminal penalties.
The legislation, which began as an attempt to rewrite federal lobbying laws in the aftermath of the Jack Abramoff scandal, has ballooned to more than 9,000 words and a thicket of complicated rules. It was the subject of a failed attempt by Senate Democrats on Wednesday to defeat a Republican filibuster over a line-item veto, and debate is continuing Thursday afternoon.
Much of the bill's wording is obtuse. But one section says that certain political bloggers who make or spend $25,000 per quarter and who encourage readers to contact their elected representatives would be forced to register as lobbyists--or face up to 10 years in prison.
"You have a First Amendment right to contact your congressperson and you have a First Amendment right to tell others to do so," said Marv Johnson, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union. "Now they're saying you have to report to the federal government if you're going to engage in this First Amendment-protected activity."
The controversial requirement lies in Section 220 of the massive bill, which supporters of the legislation say is intended to curb the practice of lobbyists setting up "astroturf" groups. But in a conference call on Thursday, a broad range of groups including the ACLU, the Free Speech Coalition, the Traditional Values Coalition and National Right To Life said it would hurt their own groups' abilities to influence Congress and place unreasonable restrictions on Internet politicking.
"We have concluded that this would certainly include bloggers," said Mark Fitzgibbons from American Target Advertising, which provides services to mostly conservative organizations. Fitzgibbons, who runs the GrassrootsFreedom.com advocacy site that opposes Section 220, warned that the legislation "has no regard for the media being used" and includes the Internet.
Under the legislation, a "grassroots lobbying firm" must register with the government or face civil and criminal penalties. "Grassroots lobbying" is defined as a person engaging in "paid efforts" to encourage the "general public to communicate their own views on an issue to federal officials." That person must also spend or receive at least $25,000 related to his or her political efforts over any three-month period.
A letter that Fitzgibbons wrote last week uses the example of a political blogger who raises money for a newspaper ad that costs $25,000 would be affected by the rule.
"Nobody I know doubts that the 'culture' of Washington and Congress itself need serious attention and cures," he wrote. "Attempts to regulate communications to the general public made by those who do not have Washington lobbyists, however, shifts the blame away from the real culprits within Congress and Washington."
The growing outcry over Section 220, especially from conservative groups including Gun Owners of America, has led some key supporters of the overall legislation to defect and oppose that language. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) has said that he will vote for Amendment 20 by Sen. Bob Bennett (R-Utah) to strip out Section 220.
"This provision actually has fairly limited impact, but the way it's written and the way the (current law) is written it's very confusing," Guinane said. "I think there's been some misinformation here that's whipped up some hysteria in the blogging community that's not justified."
Guinane acknowledged the language was confusing, and said that she would prefer to see it rewritten rather than completely eliminated through the Bennett amendment. "I'd rather see them clarify 220 so it's perfectly clear to everyone how limited the impact of this provision would be," she said.
Originally, Section 220 had only civil penalties (existing law specifies fines of up to $50,000). But last week, by a vote of 93-2, the Senate added criminal penalties for failing to "comply with any provision"--which is what, in part, caused the new outcry from grassroots groups that would be affected by it.
The US Senate wants the internet and talk radio controlled or dead. The senate is far more dangerous than al Queda.
OK, but that doesn't change my opinion about our senate, especially RINO's like McCain, who would shut down free speech faster than would a Democrat.
Grassroots Lobbying "Reform" Bill Fails in Senate
This issue is so important.
Everyone in America should become familiar with this threat to free speech!
All talkshow hosts should discuss this some every day.
Republican/conservative lobbyists/bloggers = "corruption" (in the view of the Democrats)
Saddam and the Democrat Congress both followed Joseph Stalin.
Hooray for the ACLU on this one.
OMG. Did I really say that?
I am becoming more and more "disillusioned" with our elected leaders...When will Dems suspend the right to vote for another party other than their own?
Yes, like in Iraq, where they went to vote & Saddams name was the only one on the ballot!!! Wake up conservatives!!!
Wow, did anyone actually read the proposed legislation? The people identified in the bill are lobbyists. Not bloggers, but astroturfing lobbyists... The following criteria has to be met in order to be affected by this law:
1 An Astroturfer with 1 or more clients
2 Reaching 500 people
3 Being paid $100,000 a year
With that said, it would be easy to ammend it in the future to apply to any political dissent. On the other hand, the existing laws requiring lobbyists and PACs to register seems to work quite well.
What is an "Astroturfer?" I thought that was the stuff in Bill Clinton's pickup bed.
That means dave, or is likely to mean, dave, that you are a beneficiary of that law -- a member of the protected class. No rabble in the mix. All players have to kiss the ass of power and pay a stiff fee. Yes, indeed, does "work well".
BUMP for later read.
Register to speak? Register to read is next.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.