Skip to comments.
Congress appeal to Justice for border patrol agents
worldnetdaily.com ^
| 1/10/07
Posted on 01/18/2007 2:13:50 PM PST by alienken
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 221 next last
To: TomGuy
How many pounds of marijuana does one have to transport into the US -- twice -- for that to be a felony?Irrelevant to the case we're discussing, sorry.
61
posted on
01/18/2007 2:54:42 PM PST
by
PRND21
To: PRND21
62
posted on
01/18/2007 2:56:31 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ...... California 2007,, Where's a script re-write guy when ya need 'em?)
To: alienken
The judge probably told the jury they may only consider "the facts of the case" and that they cannot let their conscience,opinion of the law,or the motives of the defendants affect their decision... (check your brain at the door please...)
fullyinformedjuries
63
posted on
01/18/2007 2:58:28 PM PST
by
Rakkasan1
((Illegal immigrants are just undocumented friends you haven't met yet!))
To: CharlesWayneCT
Can't help but notice how quick you are to tell this other person how his comments are "uncalled for", but I guess it's OK that I "shouldn't be allowed to vote".
To: killermedic
Try
here and
here for starters.
My "stand" is -illegal immigration is bad, legal immigration is good.
65
posted on
01/18/2007 2:58:43 PM PST
by
PRND21
To: editor-surveyor
Excellent use of facts to support your position.
FR is all the better because of you.
66
posted on
01/18/2007 2:59:40 PM PST
by
PRND21
To: PRND21
Just curious -- why the focus on the (relatively minor) obstruction charge, rather than the count that earned these guys the 10 year mandatory federal time?
67
posted on
01/18/2007 3:00:56 PM PST
by
absalom01
(The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.)
To: NormsRevenge
Enjoy the 'high ground'.Always snarky when wrong...thanks for being consistent.
Still waiting for you to back up your "kept out of court" quip.
68
posted on
01/18/2007 3:03:28 PM PST
by
PRND21
To: TBP
Jorge Bush was saving his 'compassionate conservatism' for the compassionate ,crimalien drug smugglers. That smuggler was probably bringing the pot for free distribution to poor people dying of cancer.
geez, where's your compassion,man?
69
posted on
01/18/2007 3:03:47 PM PST
by
Rakkasan1
((Illegal immigrants are just undocumented friends you haven't met yet!))
To: PRND21
FR is definately all the worse for you.
To: Emmett McCarthy
OK, Emmett...you may vote.
However, since you want to impeach Bush for not pardoning felons before the appeal process, I reserve the right to not take you seriously.
71
posted on
01/18/2007 3:05:18 PM PST
by
PRND21
To: absalom01
Which count brought the 10 year mandatory federal time?
72
posted on
01/18/2007 3:06:21 PM PST
by
PRND21
To: editor-surveyor
FR is definately all the worse for you.Your record on this thread speaks for itself.
73
posted on
01/18/2007 3:07:09 PM PST
by
PRND21
To: PRND21
Irrelevant to the case we're discussing, sorry.
No, it isn't irrelevant. Not when the testimony that convicted the 2 BP agents was from someone who, without the immunity, could have been charged with felonies, himself.
It shows that the Bush Administration was more interested in imprisoning 2 Border Agents for doing their job than an imprisoning a drug dealer who transports hundreds of pounds of drugs into the country.
The significant difference is that the 2 Agents are no longer on the border trying to protect the US from the invaders. Whereas the drug dealer is still on the streets and has probably transported a few more tons of illicit drugs into the US.
74
posted on
01/18/2007 3:08:28 PM PST
by
TomGuy
To: PRND21
Why even bother?
You're a broken record.
75
posted on
01/18/2007 3:09:03 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ...... California 2007,, Where's a script re-write guy when ya need 'em?)
To: TomGuy
No, it isn't irrelevant.Actually, it is.
How many pounds of marijuana does one have to transport into the US -- twice -- for that to be a felony?
That is not relevant to the felony convictions.
76
posted on
01/18/2007 3:12:17 PM PST
by
PRND21
To: alienken
77
posted on
01/18/2007 3:14:26 PM PST
by
Dov in Houston
(Don't try to confuse me with facts. It's my way or the highway)
To: NormsRevenge
You're a broken record.You can't back up your claim. Keep carping.
78
posted on
01/18/2007 3:14:33 PM PST
by
PRND21
To: PRND21
Like I said, you wouldn't give anything offered any credence anyway, you wouldn't trust me as a source., yaknow. Much less WND or newsmax or whoever.
Go search the trial threads for yourself, the "juror comments" are out there, not that you care, this is personal for you for some reason. it seems it's the only reason folks like you hang out here.
79
posted on
01/18/2007 3:18:55 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ...... California 2007,, Where's a script re-write guy when ya need 'em?)
To: NormsRevenge
Like I said, you wouldn't give anything offered any credence anyway, you wouldn't trust me as a source.Uh, I just asked for a source to your claim.
Go search the trial threads for yourself
Sheesh.
80
posted on
01/18/2007 3:26:33 PM PST
by
PRND21
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 221 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson