Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sheriff orders probe of radio contest death
Sacramento Bee ^ | 1/18/2007 | Christina Jewett - Bee Staff Writer

Posted on 01/18/2007 10:47:09 AM PST by GoldCountryRedneck

Sacramento County Sheriff John McGinness assigned two homicide detectives Wednesday to investigate the apparent water-intoxication death of a Rancho Cordova woman who competed in a radio-station stunt to win a Nintendo gaming console.

Jennifer Strange (deceased), her husband, and children.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: jenniferleastrange; radio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last
To: ContemptofCourt

I used to be a commercial litigation attorney. Now I'm transactional. I'm not saying they won't look at the language. But I don't think they are just going to apply it without considering the policy, and the facts. I suspect they will be looking for reasons to throw it out without doing too much damage to the law.


61 posted on 01/18/2007 12:54:18 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
I love eating contests. Every so often, you can catch a show about the participants - it's intriguing, especially that little teensy Japanese guy who can eat like twice his own weight.

Watch it on HDTV and I don't think you will think them so great... ;)

62 posted on 01/18/2007 12:54:34 PM PST by frogjerk (REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Clearly, if I'm the plaintiff I'm arguing policy, and if I'm the defendant I'm arguing strict interpretation of the language (unless their ain't no language to interepret), and if I'm the judge I'm gonna see if I can push the case to settle. The case will probably go to MSJ and then to mediation. Only question is how much she gets.


63 posted on 01/18/2007 12:58:28 PM PST by ContemptofCourt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

What kind of laws would a liberal pass against abusing dihydrogen monoxide?


64 posted on 01/18/2007 12:59:40 PM PST by racing fan (Go Team Israel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Frapster
Unintentional killing(s) in which the actor(s) should have known they were creating substantial and unjustified risks of death

That the rationale as to why drivers of autos where a passenger gets killed in an accident get charged if the driver is at fault? I'm really not an atty, just curious.

I'm of the school on this radio stunt that unfortunate accidents happen; lotta blame to go around but not of criminal or even civil recovery nature.

The radio DJ's can kiss their broadcasting careers goodbye as they live with the guilt.

65 posted on 01/18/2007 1:00:15 PM PST by GoldCountryRedneck ("Idiocy - Never under estimate the power of stupid people in large numbers" - despair.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
I will admit that I've only watched it on our regular TV, not projected on our big media wall.

Even the little Japanese dude might sketch me out if he's life-size! (But he's got great abs.)


66 posted on 01/18/2007 1:04:46 PM PST by Xenalyte (Anything is possible when you don't understand how anything happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ContemptofCourt

Agreed.

According to one of the other posters, the DJs told a nurse who called in to tell them that it was dangerous, "We know, but we got releases. We're not responsible."

If you're a judge looking for a way to throw it out, the first question that comes to your mind is, "What did they know, and did they tell her everything they knew?"

If not, then the assumption of risk defense seems weaker.

Also, I wonder whether assumption of risk by this woman applies against her survivors. Probably so, I guess, since otherwise most of the ski resorts would be out of business.


67 posted on 01/18/2007 1:04:47 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: ContemptofCourt; Brilliant
Update

The attorney for the plaintiff (father) will be on KFBK Sacramento - Tom Sullivans' talk show - shortly. I'll try to stay tuned and pass along whatever I'm able to get while I work.

68 posted on 01/18/2007 1:05:47 PM PST by GoldCountryRedneck ("Idiocy - Never under estimate the power of stupid people in large numbers" - despair.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

All I know about California law is that I can always find a case that says what I want it to say. Glad I don't practice there.


69 posted on 01/18/2007 1:06:36 PM PST by ContemptofCourt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: racing fan
Well, for one thing, they would pass a law limiting the emissions of DHMO by automobiles since it is the leading cause of Global Warming:

Water Vapor Rules the Greenhouse System

Just how much of the "Greenhouse Effect" is caused by human activity?

It is about 0.28%, if water vapor is taken into account-- about 5.53%, if not.

This point is so crucial to the debate over global warming that how water vapor is or isn't factored into an analysis of Earth's greenhouse gases makes the difference between describing a significant human contribution to the greenhouse effect, or a negligible one.

Water vapor constitutes Earth's most significant greenhouse gas, accounting for about 95% of Earth's greenhouse effect (4). Interestingly, many "facts and figures' regarding global warming completely ignore the powerful effects of water vapor in the greenhouse system, carelessly (perhaps, deliberately) overstating human impacts as much as 20-fold.

70 posted on 01/18/2007 1:07:52 PM PST by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: GoldCountryRedneck

I'm not an attoreny either. I googled that. lol

I agree with you - accidents happen. However, a business should understand the liabilities of asking people abuse their bodies and their bodily functions. There's a reason our bodies eliminate waste. Apparently one of them is to keep cells from blowing up like balloons.


71 posted on 01/18/2007 1:09:34 PM PST by Frapster (Don't mind me - I'm distracted by the pretty lights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: He'sComingBack!

Don't forget, she got tickets for that evening's Justin Timberlake's concert. The tickets were her consolation prize for accepting Second Place in the water contest.


72 posted on 01/18/2007 1:09:51 PM PST by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte

In HDTV you can see the Japanese dude blow hot dog chunks out of his nose when he starts vomiting after the Nathan's contest at Coney Island. YUM!!!


73 posted on 01/18/2007 1:11:33 PM PST by frogjerk (REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Really? Maybe if ALL the contestants died, sure. Then we can say that such an activity is dangerous. But one person? Out of how many?

Really? Maybe if ALL the contestants died, sure. Then we can say that Russian Roulette with a snubnose revolver is dangerous. But one person? Out of how many? Six?

Hyponatremia can kill and that is not a medical fact open to debate any more than the fact that playing Russian Roulette can kill even if five times out of six it won't.

Severe hyponatremia (sodium concentrations below 120 mmol/L) can result in a rapid influx of water into the brain, causing the brain to swell and to then set off a chain of serious neurological responses that can ultimately end in death via a rupture of the brainstem. Keep in mind that fatal hyponatremia is rare in athletes; however, because it can be a very serious and dangerous condition it's important to be aware of the causes, symptoms and precautions of water intoxication.

74 posted on 01/18/2007 1:16:54 PM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: GoldCountryRedneck
Tomorrows headline today:

Strange Death Strange

Strangers Stricken


75 posted on 01/18/2007 1:22:37 PM PST by Revolting cat! (We all need someone we can bleed on...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Was she the winner? If not, then others drank more than she did! And they didn't die, did they?

Extremely simple high school chemistry question:

You have a certain concentration of sodium in a 110 pound volume of saline fluid (a certain human body) and the same concentration of sodium in a 170 pound volume of saline fluid (another human body). You then add two gallons of free water to the first container and two gallons and five ounces of free water to the second container.

Which container will end up with the most diluted sodium concentration?

76 posted on 01/18/2007 1:30:19 PM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
"You have a certain concentration of sodium in a 110 pound volume of saline fluid (a certain human body) and the same concentration of sodium in a 170 pound volume of saline fluid (another human body). You then add two gallons of free water to the first container and two gallons and five ounces of free water to the second container.

Which container will end up with the most diluted sodium concentration?"

A witch!

77 posted on 01/18/2007 1:34:15 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: GoldCountryRedneck

Does this mean that the sponsors of the hot dog eating contests and all of the other "stuff your face" contests are gonna have to stop their promotions? People can die from overeating too you know.

While I do have sympathy for the family who lost their loved one, where do you draw the line on this? If the contest isn't illegal, and if people chose to participate on their own free will, then why should criminal charges be considered, or a civil suit for that matter? I know the family is gonna win big bucks, but should they???

Flame away if you wish but I'm just wondering about it all.


78 posted on 01/18/2007 1:41:16 PM PST by dmw (Aren't you glad you use common sense, don't you wish everybody did?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte

***I want to know who that is on the left.***
He could be 10. They make them big these days.
A heckuva lot bigger than I made mine;)


79 posted on 01/18/2007 1:44:44 PM PST by aspen64 (Release the hounds!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: aspen64

You think that's a he? Is he wearing lipstick? (I can't tell.)


80 posted on 01/18/2007 1:50:20 PM PST by Xenalyte (Anything is possible when you don't understand how anything happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson