True, but I need to point out that this is exactly what the libs say.
I'm sure you'd acknowledge that loud cries against the war make the terrorists feel that they just have to hold out a little longer and we'll turn tail and run. If that isn't giving aid and comfort to the enemy, I don't know what is.
If the American people allow the libs to pull us out of Iraq before we are through, then the American people deserve the onslaught of terrorist attacks that will likely come. They deserve to lose any hope of stopping Iran and every other radical Islamic state from developing WMD.
Sad part is, it won't just be the ones who wanted to pull out that will suffer for it.
To MEGoody. You write: "If the American people allow the libs to pull us out of Iraq before we are through, then the American people deserve the onslaught of terrorist attacks that will likely come. They deserve to lose any hope of stopping Iran and every other radical Islamic state from developing WMD."
Exactly, I agree. If the majority of our country has lost the vision and guts to take the reins of world leadership as its sole superpower, then they must take the inevitable consequences. We will eventually be fighting right here in Gotham. We will either be defeated and enslaved, or be reinvigorated as a nation.
But you acknowledge that it's true. So it really shouldn't matter if the libs say it. You know, sometimes they can be right.
The question is where do we draw the line? Questioning policy? Certainly, calling terrorists "freedom fighters" and our guys "terrorists".
How do we balance civil liberty with civic responsibility in a time of war? I'm afraid it has more to do with the character of a nation, and sadly as a nation, we don't have a lot of that anymore.