Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Political Bloggers Could Be Required To Register Or Face Jail Time
Information Week. ^ | January 17 2007 | Mitch Wagner

Posted on 01/17/2007 7:36:04 PM PST by jmc1969

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last
To: jmc1969

SEC. 220. DISCLOSURE OF PAID EFFORTS TO STIMULATE GRASSROOTS LOBBYING.

(a) Definitions- Section 3 of the Act (2 U.S.C. 1602) is amended--

(1) in paragraph (7), by adding at the end of the following: `Lobbying activities include paid efforts to stimulate grassroots lobbying, but do not include grassroots lobbying.'; and

(2) by adding at the end of the following:

`(17) GRASSROOTS LOBBYING- The term `grassroots lobbying' means the voluntary efforts of members of the general public to communicate their own views on an issue to Federal officials or to encourage other members of the general public to do the same.

`(18) PAID EFFORTS TO STIMULATE GRASSROOTS LOBBYING-

`(A) IN GENERAL- The term `paid efforts to stimulate grassroots lobbying' means any paid attempt in support of lobbying contacts on behalf of a client to influence the general public or segments thereof to contact one or more covered legislative or executive branch officials (or Congress as a whole) to urge such officials (or Congress) to take specific action with respect to a matter described in section 3(8)(A), except that such term does not include any communications by an entity directed to its members, employees, officers, or shareholders.

`(B) PAID ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE GENERAL PUBLIC OR SEGMENTS THEREOF- The term `paid attempt to influence the general public or segments thereof' does not include an attempt to influence directed at less than 500 members of the general public.

`(C) REGISTRANT- For purposes of this paragraph, a person or entity is a member of a registrant if the person or entity--

`(i) pays dues or makes a contribution of more than a nominal amount to the entity;

`(ii) makes a contribution of more than a nominal amount of time to the entity;

`(iii) is entitled to participate in the governance of the entity;

`(iv) is 1 of a limited number of honorary or life members of the entity; or

`(v) is an employee, officer, director or member of the entity.

`(19) GRASSROOTS LOBBYING FIRM- The term `grassroots lobbying firm' means a person or entity that--

`(A) is retained by 1 or more clients to engage in paid efforts to stimulate grassroots lobbying on behalf of such clients; and

`(B) receives income of, or spends or agrees to spend, an aggregate of $25,000 or more for such efforts in any quarterly period.'.

(b) Registration- Section 4(a) of the Act (2 U.S.C. 1603(a)) is amended--

(1) in the flush matter at the end of paragraph (3)(A), by adding at the end the following: `For purposes of clauses (i) and (ii), the term `lobbying activities' shall not include paid efforts to stimulate grassroots lobbying.'; and

(2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:

`(4) FILING BY GRASSROOTS LOBBYING FIRMS- Not later than 45 days after a grassroots lobbying firm first is retained by a client to engage in paid efforts to stimulate grassroots lobbying, such grassroots lobbying firm shall register with the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives.'.

(c) Separate Itemization of Paid Efforts To Stimulate Grassroots Lobbying- Section 5(b) of the Act (2 U.S.C. 1604(b)) is amended--

(1) in paragraph (3), by--

(A) inserting after `total amount of all income' the following: `(including a separate good faith estimate of the total amount of income relating specifically to paid efforts to stimulate grassroots lobbying and, within that amount, a good faith estimate of the total amount specifically relating to paid advertising)'; and

(B) inserting `or a grassroots lobbying firm' after `lobbying firm';

(2) in paragraph (4), by inserting after `total expenses' the following: `(including a good faith estimate of the total amount of expenses relating specifically to paid efforts to stimulate grassroots lobbying and, within that total amount, a good faith estimate of the total amount specifically relating to paid advertising)'; and

(3) by adding at the end the following:

`Subparagraphs (B) and (C) of paragraph (2) shall not apply with respect to reports relating to paid efforts to stimulate grassroots lobbying activities.'.

(d) Good Faith Estimates and De Minimis Rules for Paid Efforts To Stimulate Grassroots Lobbying-

(1) IN GENERAL- Section 5(c) of the Act (2 U.S.C. 1604(c)) is amended to read as follows:

`(c) Estimates of Income or Expenses- For purposes of this section, the following shall apply:

`(1) Estimates of income or expenses shall be made as follows:

`(A) Estimates of amounts in excess of $10,0000 shall be rounded to the nearest $20,000.

`(B) In the event income or expenses do not exceed $10,000, the registrant shall include a statement that income or expenses totaled less than $10,000 for the reporting period.

`(2) Estimates of income or expenses relating specifically to paid efforts to stimulate grassroots lobbying shall be made as follows:

`(A) Estimates of amounts in excess of $25,000 shall be rounded to the nearest $20,000.

`(B) In the event income or expenses do not exceed $25,000, the registrant shall include a statement that income or expenses totaled less than $25,000 for the reporting period.'.

(2) TAX REPORTING- Section 15 of the Act (2 U.S.C. 1610) is amended--

(A) in subsection (a)--

(i) in paragraph (1), by striking `and' after the semicolon;

(ii) in paragraph (2), by striking the period and inserting `; and'; and

(iii) by adding at the end the following:

`(3) in lieu of using the definition of paid efforts to stimulate grassroots lobbying in section 3(18), consider as paid efforts to stimulate grassroots lobbying only those activities that are grassroots expenditures as defined in section 4911(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.'; and

(B) in subsection (b)--

(i) in paragraph (1), by striking `and' after the semicolon;

(ii) in paragraph (2), by striking the period and inserting `; and'; and

(iii) by adding at the end the following:

`(3) in lieu of using the definition of paid efforts to stimulate grassroots lobbying in section 3(18), consider as paid efforts to stimulate grassroots lobbying only those activities that are grassroots expenditures as defined in section 4911(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.'.


21 posted on 01/17/2007 7:42:58 PM PST by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

This is scary.


22 posted on 01/17/2007 7:42:59 PM PST by Commander8 (Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth? Galatians 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
Guess they think Huffington and Kos are just not up to the competition these days.

Is that going to include all the candidates who have their own blogs?

Where will this end.

Perhaps we'll need to set up shop offshore.

23 posted on 01/17/2007 7:43:09 PM PST by OldFriend (THE PRESS IS AN EVIL FOR WHICH THERE IS NO REMEDY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mylife
Wanna bet Hillary is driving the issue?

Nope. Kucinich is.

24 posted on 01/17/2007 7:43:14 PM PST by HarmlessLovableFuzzball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

I think it would give them a reason to start charging registration fees.


25 posted on 01/17/2007 7:43:42 PM PST by RabidBartender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

Here comes the NAZISM!!!

FREE SPEECH only applies to those so Annointed by the DNC. No Non-DNC approved speech will be tolerated.
SEIG HEIL!!
ABORTION UBER ALLES!!


26 posted on 01/17/2007 7:43:45 PM PST by tcrlaf (VOTE DEM! You'll Look GREAT In A Burqa!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

bookmark and bump


27 posted on 01/17/2007 7:45:26 PM PST by armymarinemom (My sons freed Iraqi and Afghan Honor Roll students.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

Blame this on McVain.


28 posted on 01/17/2007 7:46:05 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Everyone here knew or should have known that Pelosi, Reid, Clinton and company were and are pocket Stalinists.

And yet they didn't care and sat home.

29 posted on 01/17/2007 7:46:46 PM PST by Howlin (The GOP RATS - Republicans Against Total Success (Howie66))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
Great heavens - I have a habit of couching the gun control debate this way - if the Second Amendment applies only to government-approved militias, how long will it be before the First Amendment applies only to government-approved journalists?

Evidently I have my answer - right now.

30 posted on 01/17/2007 7:47:26 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

"The big boys are doing everything they can to take away the 1st Amendments rights of grass root posters."

Look...
Dems can get away with bald-faced lies, creating crisis where none exist, Decry recism but use it when it suits them, etc,etc...

The last 4 years have been a page right out of Geobbell's Propoganda Playbook, and the Dems have learned it well...

So why are we SURPRISED when they finally start making the moves that Marx and Engels assured us they would eventually???


31 posted on 01/17/2007 7:47:54 PM PST by tcrlaf (VOTE DEM! You'll Look GREAT In A Burqa!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mylife
Wanna bet Hillary is driving the issue?

More than likely you are right.

After all, she knows there are people out here like me who have -- guessing here -- 1000 bookmarks with FACTS about her husband and herself, just sitting here waiting to use them.

32 posted on 01/17/2007 7:48:13 PM PST by Howlin (The GOP RATS - Republicans Against Total Success (Howie66))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Everyone here knew or should have known that Pelosi, Reid, Clinton and company were and are pocket Stalinists.

Yeah, yeah let me guess - it's those stupid conservatives who "stayed home" fault again isn't it. It's never the fault of the testicle-free Republicans who refuse to call the Dims out and fight for what's right.

BTW, this isn't going to pass and even if it does SCOTUS will strike it down.

33 posted on 01/17/2007 7:48:21 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Why can't Republicans stand up to Democrats like they do to terrorists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

Let's forget that FR is not a blog but ...


34 posted on 01/17/2007 7:49:36 PM PST by BunnySlippers (SAY YES TO RUDY !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

Do you believe we fall under that?


35 posted on 01/17/2007 7:49:56 PM PST by Howlin (The GOP RATS - Republicans Against Total Success (Howie66))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; holdonnow; Grampa Dave; jveritas; Calpernia; tobyhill; Dog; Dog Gone; MNJohnnie; ...

Pay or STFU ping


36 posted on 01/17/2007 7:50:26 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

It will require a massive new bureaucracy and tax increases to pay for it.


37 posted on 01/17/2007 7:50:36 PM PST by Tawiskaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

Another proof that the Net is having its effect. The privileged political class has not found ways to deal with it, as it has with the MSM and with their grassroots. The Net subverts all these efforts, which worked so well in the past decades. The've learned to deal with the idiot box since Nixon unshaven mug in the 1960 debates, they've even learned to deal with street protests, but the Net? No way to control it. Until now, Mr Robinson.


38 posted on 01/17/2007 7:50:45 PM PST by Revolting cat! (We all need someone we can bleed on...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Commander8
This is scary.

And not 100% accurate. It does have to be a PAID effort to stimulate grassroots lobbying. It should not apply to you or me posting on Free Republic, for example, if we're not getting paid by a lobbyist to do it.

That being said, it's not the best idea in the world.
39 posted on 01/17/2007 7:50:50 PM PST by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mylife
Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) introduced an amendment Jan. 9 "to create criminal penalties, including up to one year in jail, if someone 'knowingly and willingly fails to file or report.'" But Vitter is now co-sponsoring Amendment 20, with Sen. Robert Bennett (R-Utah), to remove Section 220 from the bill, GrassRootsFreedom.com says.
40 posted on 01/17/2007 7:50:57 PM PST by onyx (DONATE NOW! -- It takes DONATIONS to keep FR running!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson