To: Sub-Driver
He's putting the burden on the Senate in case we're attacked again. They want to take control of the WOT then they need to accept the fact that they've been playing obstructionist also.
42 posted on
01/17/2007 11:56:10 AM PST by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: tobyhill
Exactly opposite, see post 39. He is protecting the program from the senate.. to quote another poster, once again, he is misunderestamated.
46 posted on
01/17/2007 11:59:56 AM PST by
mnehring
(Virtus Junxit mors non Separabit)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson