Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush won't reauthorize eavesdropping program
BREITBART.COM ^

Posted on 01/17/2007 11:21:09 AM PST by Sub-Driver

Bush won't reauthorize eavesdropping program Wed Jan 17, 2007 2:10 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush has decided not to reauthorize the controversial domestic warrantless surveillance program for terrorism suspects and to put it under the authority of a secret special court, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said on Wednesday.

"The president has determined not to reauthorize the Terrorist Surveillance Program

(Excerpt) Read more at today.reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bigbrother; bushcaves; govwatch; privacy; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-182 next last

1 posted on 01/17/2007 11:21:11 AM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

what is going on here? have we totally given up. this was one issue that most americans supported the President on, so he gives up?


2 posted on 01/17/2007 11:22:54 AM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Elections matter.


3 posted on 01/17/2007 11:25:02 AM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

bad


4 posted on 01/17/2007 11:25:29 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Balls quickly shrinking, I guess.


5 posted on 01/17/2007 11:26:19 AM PST by abercrombie_guy_38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

"Can you hear me now Osama?"


6 posted on 01/17/2007 11:27:00 AM PST by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

this wasn't an election issue, and we certainly have votes in the senate to support this program. there was no need to cave in on this.


7 posted on 01/17/2007 11:27:23 AM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: abercrombie_guy_38

and by caving in on this, the administration simply makes the Dems appear as if their position was right all along about this program.


8 posted on 01/17/2007 11:28:45 AM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

I really don't get this. President Bush has nothing to lose by reauthorizing this.


9 posted on 01/17/2007 11:30:15 AM PST by AGreatPer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

We really don't need enemies. We're just so doggoned good at it ourselves, we can dispense with outside enemies.

*I am terribly disappointed in our President, if this article turns out to be true, and not just media spin.


10 posted on 01/17/2007 11:32:45 AM PST by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

It doesn't sound like he has given up as much as it sounds like he is going to try a different tack. I would like to know more about this "secret special court."


11 posted on 01/17/2007 11:34:05 AM PST by Dark Skies ("He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that" ... John Stuart Mill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
LOL, voters know, and knew when voting, that the Dims were after him on this issue, along with the Patriot Act, Guantanamo, domestic WOT, ect. They knew what they were giving up for anger over "earmarks", Foley, and Iraq. They are sick of war period. At home and abroad.

They choose whom they wanted to protect them, and the majority wanted the Dims to take over Congress.

Its very simple, the 9/11 movie is over for Americans.
12 posted on 01/17/2007 11:34:21 AM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The problem with you guys here is that you are so reactionary!! Even the NYTimes website has a longer article stating that Gonzales has already gotten approvals for 2 such actions on Jan. 10. Before going off in an anti-Bush frenzy, why don't you wait until you get the entire explanation of what this is and why?


13 posted on 01/17/2007 11:35:05 AM PST by fschmieg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Capitulator and Chief!


14 posted on 01/17/2007 11:35:48 AM PST by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

In what passes for a "news" media in the U.S. Bush is damned if he does and damned if he doesn't. He needs to be damned for doing the right thing and reauthorize this vital program.


15 posted on 01/17/2007 11:36:04 AM PST by Brad from Tennessee (Anything a politician gives you he has first stolen from you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

He's just going to use a different method by the looks of things.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1769059/posts


16 posted on 01/17/2007 11:36:25 AM PST by AmeriBrit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

We now have a gelded president.


17 posted on 01/17/2007 11:36:38 AM PST by svcw (There is no plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

Is it possible that disclosure of the program rendered it sufficiently useless that it is not worth keeping?


18 posted on 01/17/2007 11:36:54 AM PST by Zeko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: All
Before any of you rubes start blaming the President, try to understand that elections matter, and you single issue, "Bush spends like a drunken sailor" nutbags who stayed home on election day have only yourselves to blame.
19 posted on 01/17/2007 11:36:58 AM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
This seems clear enough.

"Any electronic surveillance that was occurring as part of the Terrorist Surveillance Program will now be conducted subject to the approval of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court," Gonzales said.

Possibly Bush decided he could get it done through the court, since I believe the most clintonoid member of the court earlier resigned in protest over the warrentless surveillance issue.

Gonzalez is said to have said this to Democrats in the Senate, so I suppose it's possible they are misrepresenting what he said, but I kind of doubt it in this case.

20 posted on 01/17/2007 11:37:20 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-182 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson