Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/17/2007 11:21:11 AM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: Sub-Driver

what is going on here? have we totally given up. this was one issue that most americans supported the President on, so he gives up?


2 posted on 01/17/2007 11:22:54 AM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Elections matter.


3 posted on 01/17/2007 11:25:02 AM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

bad


4 posted on 01/17/2007 11:25:29 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Balls quickly shrinking, I guess.


5 posted on 01/17/2007 11:26:19 AM PST by abercrombie_guy_38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

"Can you hear me now Osama?"


6 posted on 01/17/2007 11:27:00 AM PST by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

We really don't need enemies. We're just so doggoned good at it ourselves, we can dispense with outside enemies.

*I am terribly disappointed in our President, if this article turns out to be true, and not just media spin.


10 posted on 01/17/2007 11:32:45 AM PST by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

The problem with you guys here is that you are so reactionary!! Even the NYTimes website has a longer article stating that Gonzales has already gotten approvals for 2 such actions on Jan. 10. Before going off in an anti-Bush frenzy, why don't you wait until you get the entire explanation of what this is and why?


13 posted on 01/17/2007 11:35:05 AM PST by fschmieg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Capitulator and Chief!


14 posted on 01/17/2007 11:35:48 AM PST by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

In what passes for a "news" media in the U.S. Bush is damned if he does and damned if he doesn't. He needs to be damned for doing the right thing and reauthorize this vital program.


15 posted on 01/17/2007 11:36:04 AM PST by Brad from Tennessee (Anything a politician gives you he has first stolen from you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

He's just going to use a different method by the looks of things.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1769059/posts


16 posted on 01/17/2007 11:36:25 AM PST by AmeriBrit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

We now have a gelded president.


17 posted on 01/17/2007 11:36:38 AM PST by svcw (There is no plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Before any of you rubes start blaming the President, try to understand that elections matter, and you single issue, "Bush spends like a drunken sailor" nutbags who stayed home on election day have only yourselves to blame.
19 posted on 01/17/2007 11:36:58 AM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
This seems clear enough.

"Any electronic surveillance that was occurring as part of the Terrorist Surveillance Program will now be conducted subject to the approval of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court," Gonzales said.

Possibly Bush decided he could get it done through the court, since I believe the most clintonoid member of the court earlier resigned in protest over the warrentless surveillance issue.

Gonzalez is said to have said this to Democrats in the Senate, so I suppose it's possible they are misrepresenting what he said, but I kind of doubt it in this case.

20 posted on 01/17/2007 11:37:20 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
IT IS NOT DOMESTIC SURVEILLANCE, YOU MEDIA MORONS!
21 posted on 01/17/2007 11:37:46 AM PST by AmishDude (It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Was ist los?


24 posted on 01/17/2007 11:41:21 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Pelosi, the call was for Comity, not Comedy. But thanks for the laughs. StarKisses, NVA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Disappointment after disappointment after disappointment.

Damn you, Dub, stop letting us down.

Rent, buy, or steal a pair.


27 posted on 01/17/2007 11:42:39 AM PST by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Why does this come to mind?


32 posted on 01/17/2007 11:44:04 AM PST by mnehring (Virtus Junxit mors non Separabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

He's putting the burden on the Senate in case we're attacked again. They want to take control of the WOT then they need to accept the fact that they've been playing obstructionist also.


42 posted on 01/17/2007 11:56:10 AM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Maybe since everyone seems to have forgotten the lessons of 9-11 the idea is to let us get hit a few more times so people will wake up.

I doubt that's the actual plan, but it might turn out that way.

45 posted on 01/17/2007 11:59:06 AM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Rush just said that he, too, just blew a gasket over this. BUT, he said, "and I may be reaching here," that perhaps W has made it so that the only fight will be over Iraq--truly where the Dems are weak. At least he hopes this is the strategery. If I interpreted Rush incorrectly, please comment.


51 posted on 01/17/2007 12:03:53 PM PST by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson