Paul is hands-down the best member of congress when it comes to domestic issues. He votes strictly based on the Constitution and is known as "Dr. No" since the great majority of his votes are against any given bill, which, in my opinion is a good thing since most of what congress passes is trash.
The problem with Paul is that his views on national defense are dopey. He is big-time against the war in Iraq. He has articulate arguments against it, but I still think that he is dead wrong.
I see you point..
Listen to his speech in this VIDEO. He talks about the war in Iraq, and frankly he sounds just like another Democrat... Does this makes him "Not Acceptable?"
VIDEO click on PLAY.
But hey, let's hear him make his case! :)