Skip to comments.
Another Vietnam? (Thomas Sowell)
Townhall.com ^
| January 16, 2007
| Thomas Sowell
Posted on 01/15/2007 9:30:59 PM PST by jazusamo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
1
posted on
01/15/2007 9:31:00 PM PST
by
jazusamo
To: AbeKrieger; Alia; American Quilter; arthurus; Bahbah; brf1; Congressman Billybob; ...
*PING*
Thomas Sowell
MAKING NEW THOMAS SOWELL PING LIST.
Please FReepmail me to be added to it.
2
posted on
01/15/2007 9:32:40 PM PST
by
jazusamo
(http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/DefendOurMarines.htm)
To: jazusamo
Thomas Sowell would be a brilliant addition to the U.S. Supreme Court but, of course, with Chuckie running the committee, it could never happen.
3
posted on
01/15/2007 9:39:51 PM PST
by
Rembrandt
(We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
To: jazusamo
Honest portrayal. He used facts, not cliche.
He's 100% correct, but at this point it seems that all our media does is echo chants like "Bush lied people died", or "No blood for oil".
4
posted on
01/15/2007 9:42:52 PM PST
by
Red6
(Come and get it.)
To: Rembrandt
Thomas Sowell would make a great Supreme Court Justice, IMO.
5
posted on
01/15/2007 9:45:38 PM PST
by
jazusamo
(http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/DefendOurMarines.htm)
To: Red6
He's right in most all his columns but he really nailed this one.
6
posted on
01/15/2007 9:47:10 PM PST
by
jazusamo
(http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/DefendOurMarines.htm)
To: jazusamo
Hiya jazusamo. Go ahead and add me, please.
7
posted on
01/15/2007 9:47:26 PM PST
by
onyx
(DONATE NOW! -- It takes DONATIONS to keep FR running!!)
To: onyx
Hiya, onyx. A big welcome to you. :-)
8
posted on
01/15/2007 9:48:29 PM PST
by
jazusamo
(http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/DefendOurMarines.htm)
To: jazusamo
He's one of my favorites and I usually miss his column. Now, I won't. Thanks!!!
9
posted on
01/15/2007 9:51:52 PM PST
by
onyx
(DONATE NOW! -- It takes DONATIONS to keep FR running!!)
To: jazusamo
Only after Congress cut off financial support for South Vietnam, while the North Vietnamese continued to get support from the Communist bloc, did South Vietnam fall.
Since then, even the Communist conquerors have admitted that they did not win on the battlefield, but in the American media and in the American political arena, surrounded by an atmosphere created by a defeatist media.
---
Plink!
BullsEye!
10
posted on
01/15/2007 9:58:46 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ...... California 2007,, Where's a script re-write guy when ya need 'em?)
To: All; jazusamo
.
NEVER FORGET
The Vietnam War:
Sen. TED KENNEDY pushed a post-WATERGATE Democrat Congress into cutting off all our funding for the Free South Vietnamese to repel a Communist Terrorist invasion from the North.
Giving us:
Pictures of a vietnamese Re-Education (SLAVE LABOR) Camp
http://www.Freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1308949/posts
The Iraq War:
Sen. TED KENNEDY is now pushing a new Democrat Congress into doing the exact same thing to a Free Iraq =
12 Million suddenly missing Iraqi purple Voting fingers..?
Signed:.."ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer
Veteran-1st Major Battles for Freedom of the Vietnam War 1965-66
http://www.lzxray.com/guyer_set1.htm **
** See 5th Photo down-Sen. TED KENNEDY being briefed on exactly what the Fight for Freedom in South Vietnam was really all about, while touring military installations in-country, October 1965
In other words...
...Sen. TED KENNEDY has just known better from the very beginning.
For...
...the Enemy is now Within
...and always has been.
NEVER FORGET
.
11
posted on
01/15/2007 10:04:36 PM PST
by
ALOHA RONNIE
("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
To: Rembrandt
He wouldn't take the job.
Not even with a gun to his head.
12
posted on
01/15/2007 10:04:50 PM PST
by
El Sordo
To: jazusamo
American and other coalition troops in Iraq have had their hands tied with "rules of engagement" based on political, rather than military, considerations.
...Instead of confronting these militias at the outset with an ultimatum to disarm or be killed, we let the Iraqi government veto what our military forces could do, leaving Shi'ite militias intact in Baghdad's "Sadr City" neighborhood and elsewhere.
Having pushed the "democracy" vision for Iraq, we could not simply disregard the country's elected government. But democracy arose in western civilization centuries after law and order had been established. We tried to do it in the reverse order in Iraq.
13
posted on
01/15/2007 10:08:48 PM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
(Romney si! Rudy no!)
To: ALOHA RONNIE
Thanks for your post, ALOHA RONNIE.
14
posted on
01/15/2007 10:11:48 PM PST
by
jazusamo
(http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/DefendOurMarines.htm)
If it ever really is another 'Vietnam' then it will because the Democrats made it that way. Magic lines that cant be crossed to go after the enemies properly and then destroying what effectiveness is possible by playing politics and defunding the effort.
To: jazusamo
.....Our choice may become whether we are prepared to sacrifice more American lives in order to prop up the Maliki government or whether we are prepared to sacrifice the Maliki government in order to restore law and order in Iraq..... IMO this has become our choice.
To: jazusamo
"The success or failure of the troop surge in Iraq may depend far more on whether those troops can again be hamstrung by politically restrictive "rules of engagement" than on how many troops there are."
_______________________________________
This has been my concern from the beginning....we cannot win a politically correct war!!
Get in, get the job done, get out.
17
posted on
01/15/2007 10:45:53 PM PST
by
cowdog77
(" Are there any brave men left in Washington, or are they all cowards.")
To: jazusamo
Bump for later, since it's 2 a.m.
To: jazusamo
*sigh* History repeats...
Kerry Lied
Millions Died
19
posted on
01/15/2007 10:54:32 PM PST
by
null and void
(Propaganda doesn't have to make sense. Hell, it often works better if it doesn't.)
To: jazusamo
20
posted on
01/15/2007 11:26:14 PM PST
by
Mr. Silverback
("Safe sex? Not until they develop a condom for the heart."--Freeper All the Best)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson