Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man aims to become licensed hemp farmer
Associated Press ^ | Jan 15, 2007 | DALE WETZEL

Posted on 01/15/2007 2:07:51 PM PST by ellery

BISMARCK, N.D. - David Monson began pushing the idea of growing industrial hemp in the United States a decade ago. Now his goal may be within reach — but first he needs to be fingerprinted. Monson plans this week to apply to become the nation's first licensed industrial hemp farmer. He will have to provide two sets of fingerprints and proof that he's not a criminal.

The farmer, school superintendent and state legislator would like to start by growing 10 acres of the crop, and he spent part of his weekend staking out the field he wants to use.

"I'm starting to see that we maybe have a chance," Monson said. "For a while, it was getting really depressing."

Last month, the state Agriculture Department finished its work on rules farmers may use to grow industrial hemp, a cousin of marijuana that does not have the drug's hallucinogenic properties. The sturdy, fibrous plant is used to make an assortment of products, ranging from paper, rope and lotions to car panels, carpet backing and animal bedding.

Applicants must provide latitude and longitude coordinates for their proposed hemp fields, furnish fingerprints and pay at least $202 in fees, including $37 to cover the cost of criminal record checks.

Agriculture Commissioner Roger Johnson said the federal Drug Enforcement Administration still must give its permission before Monson, or anyone else, may grow industrial hemp.

"That is going to be a major hurdle," Johnson said.

Another impediment is the DEA's annual registration fee of $2,293, which is nonrefundable even if the agency does not grant permission to grow industrial hemp. Processing the paperwork for Monson's license should take about a month, Johnson said.

A DEA spokesman has said North Dakota applications to grow industrial hemp will be reviewed, and Johnson said North Dakota's rules were developed with the agency's concerns in mind. Law enforcement officials fear industrial hemp can shield illicit marijuana, although hemp supporters say the concern is unfounded.

North Dakota is one of seven states that have authorized industrial hemp farming. The others are Hawaii, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Montana and West Virginia, according to Vote Hemp, an industrial hemp advocacy organization based in Bedford, Mass.

California lawmakers approved legislation last year that set out rules for industrial hemp production, but Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed it. The law asserted that the federal government lacked authority to regulate industrial hemp as a drug.

In 2005, U.S. Rep. Ron Paul (news, bio, voting record), R-Texas, introduced legislation to exclude industrial hemp from the definition of marijuana in federal drug laws. It never came to a vote.

Monson farms near Osnabrock, a Cavalier County community in North Dakota's northeastern corner. He is the assistant Republican majority leader in the North Dakota House and is the school superintendent in Edinburg, which has about 140 students in grades kindergarten through 12.

In 1997, during his second session in the Legislature, Monson successfully pushed a bill to require North Dakota State University to study industrial hemp as an alternative crop for the state's farmers.

Canada made it legal for farmers to grow the crop in March 1998. Last year, Canadian farmers planted 48,060 acres of hemp, government statistics say. Manitoba and Saskatchewan, the provinces along North Dakota's northern border, were Canada's biggest hemp producers.

"I do know that industrial hemp grows really well 20 miles north of me," Monson said. "I don't see any reason why that wouldn't be a major crop for me, if this could go through."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hemp; wod; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-202 next last
To: april15Bendovr
The prohibition arguments comparing marijuana to alcohol gets tired real quick.
ROFL!
The truth blows your propaganda out of the water!
.
121 posted on 01/16/2007 1:51:21 PM PST by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: mugs99
"The truth blows your propaganda out of the water!"

That all depends on if anyone is stoned or not reading it.

If anyone is stoned now? it might distort a perception of reality therefor ruining any chance at being able to recognizing the truth.

122 posted on 01/16/2007 2:30:53 PM PST by april15Bendovr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: ellery
Dude!

George Washington was in a cult, and the cult was into aliens, man. ... Behind every good man there is a woman, and that woman was Martha Washington, man, and everyday George would come home, she would have a big fat bowl waiting for him, man, when he come in the door, man, she was a hip, hip, hip lady, man. ... Didja ever look at a dollar bill, man? There's some spooky shit goin' on there. And it's green too.

123 posted on 01/16/2007 2:37:01 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Is that you Dave?


124 posted on 01/16/2007 2:39:36 PM PST by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ellery
He will have to provide two sets of fingerprints and proof that he's not a criminal.

Myself, I only have one set of fingerprints. So I guess I'm out....

125 posted on 01/16/2007 2:43:46 PM PST by steveo (ADVERTISEMENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr
it might distort a perception of reality therefor ruining any chance at being able to recognizing the truth

I agree with you. Maybe you should try reading the truth sober instead of stoned.
.
126 posted on 01/16/2007 2:55:09 PM PST by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: mugs99
I read the truth while high on life.

I don't need a psychedelic hippie leftwing drug to help me out.
127 posted on 01/16/2007 3:21:31 PM PST by april15Bendovr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr
If anyone is stoned now? it might distort a perception of reality therefor ruining any chance at being able to recognizing the truth.

Like being able to tell rope from dope?

128 posted on 01/16/2007 3:25:42 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr
I don't need a psychedelic hippie leftwing drug to help me out.
LOL
It was the leftwing FDR administration that began cannabis prohibition. Republicans and the American Medical Association opposed cannabis prohibition.

I read the truth while high on life.
Comic books?
.
129 posted on 01/16/2007 3:28:44 PM PST by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
Yep the rope-a-dope crowd.

I'm sure the people who like hemp have no ambitions to legalize marijuana.

No connection there at all I guess?
130 posted on 01/16/2007 3:29:23 PM PST by april15Bendovr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr

Don't know. What does growing industrial hemp have to do with legalizing marijuana? Do you believe the argument that all hemp is marijuana?


131 posted on 01/16/2007 3:32:58 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: mugs99

http://www.hazelden.org/web/public/ade80316.page

Marijuana flourished during the '60s and '70s. By 1979, surveys revealed that 15 million Americans were using marijuana at least once a week and that 60 percent of high school seniors had used marijuana at least once. This psychoactive drug, a popular counterculture symbol of the '60s and '70s, steadily decreased in popularity during the 1980s. But today it is still by far the most widely used illicit drug in the United States. In 1985, 28.6 million Americans had used marijuana at least once during the past year compared with 18 million in 1994.


132 posted on 01/16/2007 3:42:09 PM PST by april15Bendovr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
"Do you have an argument to present for or against the cultivation of industrial hemp?"

If I knew there wasn't a connection between the legalize marijuana crowd and promoting industrial hemp I would be more comfortable.
133 posted on 01/16/2007 3:46:16 PM PST by april15Bendovr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr
Marijuana flourished during the '60s and '70s.

Your point?
.
134 posted on 01/16/2007 3:46:28 PM PST by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr
If I knew there wasn't a connection between the legalize marijuana crowd and promoting industrial hemp I would be more comfortable.

I can't tell you that there aren't people associated with one who don't try to associate themselves with the other. The question is does that change the reality, or just the perception?

135 posted on 01/16/2007 4:49:13 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: mugs99
"It was the leftwing FDR administration that began cannabis prohibition. Republicans and the American Medical Association opposed cannabis prohibition. Republicans and the American Medical Association opposed cannabis prohibition.
"

My Point

"This psychoactive drug, a popular counterculture symbol of the '60s and '70s" Made popular by left wing hippies that wernt around during the FDR administration when THC (marijuana) was virtually unheard of.

My other point is talking to libertarians and potheads on this topic is a exercise in futility.

136 posted on 01/16/2007 4:56:17 PM PST by april15Bendovr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr
My other point is talking to libertarians statists and potheads authoritarians on this topic is a exercise in futility.

fixed
137 posted on 01/16/2007 4:59:40 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Did you roll and smoke your favorite T-shirt?


138 posted on 01/16/2007 5:04:10 PM PST by dforest (Liberals love crisis, create crisis and then dwell on them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr
"This psychoactive drug, a popular counterculture symbol of the '60s and '70s"

You figure on winning the culture war by attacking a "symbol" from 40 years ago?

139 posted on 01/16/2007 5:07:22 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Industrial hemp can do a lot of things for us. It's viable for fuel, clothing, and paper. It would really help the paper industry here in Wisconsin.

Indeed.

You can thank William Randolph Hearst for the fact that it was erradicated and made illegal many years ago in this country.

140 posted on 01/16/2007 5:11:21 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Crime cannot be tolerated. Criminals thrive on the indulgences of society's understanding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-202 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson