Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When Beating up on 'Deadbeat Dads' is Unfair
Houston Chronicle ^ | 1/7/07 | Jeffery M. Leving and Glenn Sacks

Posted on 01/15/2007 1:49:04 PM PST by PercivalWalks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-331 next last

1 posted on 01/15/2007 1:49:08 PM PST by PercivalWalks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks

This is waht debtors prison is for. Anyone not supporting his children is worthless.


2 posted on 01/15/2007 1:53:04 PM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

You are one sick individual if that's really your stance.


3 posted on 01/15/2007 1:55:59 PM PST by Doohickey (I am not unappeasable. YOU are just too easily appeased.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks

They couldn't even afford a condom.


4 posted on 01/15/2007 1:56:07 PM PST by wolfcreek (Please Lord, May I be, one who sees what's in front of me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks

Sucks to be them...


5 posted on 01/15/2007 1:56:13 PM PST by dakine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

Zieg Hiel!!


6 posted on 01/15/2007 1:58:27 PM PST by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks

Government destroys everything in its path. It is truly an abomination.


7 posted on 01/15/2007 1:59:06 PM PST by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks

Unfortunately children cost money to raise and that cost doesn't stop when you (weep, sob) lose your job. You can't tell a child to quit eating until Daddy finds another suitable job.


8 posted on 01/15/2007 1:59:43 PM PST by w1andsodidwe (Jimmy Carter allowed radical Islam to get a foothold in Iran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks

Pay it on time. Your child has to eat every day...not just when you decide to "catch up."


9 posted on 01/15/2007 1:59:48 PM PST by bannie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero
"Zieg Hiel!!"

Boy, I must have hit a nerve. Guilty conscience?

10 posted on 01/15/2007 2:01:32 PM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks
What’s needed instead is an overhaul of the system, so that blue-collar workers aren't turned into criminals because they’ve failed to pay obligations which are beyond their reach.

BS. You have kids then be prepared to pay for them until they are grown. Why should the wife (or girlfriend) be left to work and care for the kids and the husband get off scott free? Answer: They shouldn't.

11 posted on 01/15/2007 2:01:47 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: w1andsodidwe

And what if dear old dad is in an intact family and he loses his job? Does he miraculously have money to support his family?


12 posted on 01/15/2007 2:04:18 PM PST by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks
According to the Urban Institute, less than one in 20 non-custodial parents who suffers a substantial drop in income is able to get courts to reduce his or her child support payments.

Of course not. To do so would infringe on the ex-wife's lifestyle.

Abbott’s office backhandedly acknowledges the difficulties men in these situations face, advising obligors “it is best to get a lawyer, if you can afford one, to handle your attempt to change the amount of child support you owe.” Yet how many unemployed blue-collar workers can afford to hire an attorney at $200 an hour or more to represent them in a child support case?

Nobody, but then again reality hasn't played a party in family law in the United States for a long time.
13 posted on 01/15/2007 2:04:20 PM PST by Old_Mil (http://www.constitutionparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks
As I understand TX law these so called "deadbeats" can each be sentenced to up to two years in prison for non-payment?

Thus we the tax-payers pay the bills to "in-prison" the dads, while also dishing out supplemental welfare to the moms and kids..
14 posted on 01/15/2007 2:05:25 PM PST by VRWCTexan (History has a long memory - but still repeats itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
What about the WOMAN taking some birth control responsibility??? Hmmmmm?

Oh, BTW, I'm a WOMAN! and I've known several who don't use birth control because they think its the man's responsibility!

First thing I told my son when he became a teenager is DON'T believe a female when she says she is protected. YOU make sure you are cause females lie! He is in his early 30's and I STILL remind him of this from time to time!
15 posted on 01/15/2007 2:05:46 PM PST by proudofthesouth (Mao said that power comes at the point of a rifle; I say FREEDOM does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn
"Why should the wife (or girlfriend) be left to work and care for the kids and the husband get off scott free? Answer: They shouldn't."

I agree. I also believe that single mothers should be held more accountable for the way child support dollars are spent, with similar civil and criminal penalties when that money is utilized for other than its intended purposes.

16 posted on 01/15/2007 2:05:56 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Voted Free Republic's Most Eligible Bachelor: 2006. Love them Diebold machines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law
Boy, I must have hit a nerve. Guilty conscience?

Boy, you must be an arrogant jerk. Narrow mind?

17 posted on 01/15/2007 2:06:03 PM PST by TChris (The Democratic Party: A sewer into which is emptied treason, inhumanity and barbarism - O. Morton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn

I agree, men need to support they're children but realistically, things happen whether you are in an intact family or not. There should be recourse for those who fall into extreme bad luck.


18 posted on 01/15/2007 2:06:18 PM PST by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bannie

"Pay it on time"

Yassuh, I'll pay waterever Uncle Sugar tells me to, Massuh!

"a roofer who owed $240,581."

"Your child has to eat every day..."

Oh, PLEASE!!

Evidently they are eating about 12 meals a day 15 days a week if it takes a quarter of a million bucks to feed them.

Where in the hell do you expect a roofer to get a quarter of a million dollars?

You sick people are advocating making it a crime for men to have children outside their home and be poor.


19 posted on 01/15/2007 2:09:12 PM PST by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: proudofthesouth

What about the idea that when two people create a child that child becomes their number one priority until it is an adult. That means you support the child before you move out, get a girl or boy friend, a new spouse, additional kids, a red Corvette, hair plugs or breast implants, join a gym or pay for a dating service. If you have to sleep in a phone booth and flip burgers or shovel sh*t 18 hours a day to make it happen, so be it.


20 posted on 01/15/2007 2:11:19 PM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-331 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson