Skip to comments.
When Beating up on 'Deadbeat Dads' is Unfair
Houston Chronicle ^
| 1/7/07
| Jeffery M. Leving and Glenn Sacks
Posted on 01/15/2007 1:49:04 PM PST by PercivalWalks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-331 next last
To: PercivalWalks
This is waht debtors prison is for. Anyone not supporting his children is worthless.
To: Natural Law
You are one sick individual if that's really your stance.
3
posted on
01/15/2007 1:55:59 PM PST
by
Doohickey
(I am not unappeasable. YOU are just too easily appeased.)
To: PercivalWalks
They couldn't even afford a condom.
4
posted on
01/15/2007 1:56:07 PM PST
by
wolfcreek
(Please Lord, May I be, one who sees what's in front of me.)
To: PercivalWalks
5
posted on
01/15/2007 1:56:13 PM PST
by
dakine
To: Natural Law
6
posted on
01/15/2007 1:58:27 PM PST
by
L98Fiero
(A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
To: PercivalWalks
Government destroys everything in its path. It is truly an abomination.
7
posted on
01/15/2007 1:59:06 PM PST
by
microgood
To: PercivalWalks
Unfortunately children cost money to raise and that cost doesn't stop when you (weep, sob) lose your job. You can't tell a child to quit eating until Daddy finds another suitable job.
8
posted on
01/15/2007 1:59:43 PM PST
by
w1andsodidwe
(Jimmy Carter allowed radical Islam to get a foothold in Iran.)
To: PercivalWalks
Pay it on time. Your child has to eat every day...not just when you decide to "catch up."
9
posted on
01/15/2007 1:59:48 PM PST
by
bannie
To: L98Fiero
"Zieg Hiel!!" Boy, I must have hit a nerve. Guilty conscience?
To: PercivalWalks
Whats needed instead is an overhaul of the system, so that blue-collar workers aren't turned into criminals because theyve failed to pay obligations which are beyond their reach.
BS. You have kids then be prepared to pay for them until they are grown. Why should the wife (or girlfriend) be left to work and care for the kids and the husband get off scott free? Answer: They shouldn't.
To: w1andsodidwe
And what if dear old dad is in an intact family and he loses his job? Does he miraculously have money to support his family?
12
posted on
01/15/2007 2:04:18 PM PST
by
tiki
To: PercivalWalks
According to the Urban Institute, less than one in 20 non-custodial parents who suffers a substantial drop in income is able to get courts to reduce his or her child support payments.
Of course not. To do so would infringe on the ex-wife's lifestyle.
Abbotts office backhandedly acknowledges the difficulties men in these situations face, advising obligors it is best to get a lawyer, if you can afford one, to handle your attempt to change the amount of child support you owe. Yet how many unemployed blue-collar workers can afford to hire an attorney at $200 an hour or more to represent them in a child support case?
Nobody, but then again reality hasn't played a party in family law in the United States for a long time.
13
posted on
01/15/2007 2:04:20 PM PST
by
Old_Mil
(http://www.constitutionparty.com/)
To: PercivalWalks
As I understand TX law these so called "deadbeats" can each be sentenced to up to two years in prison for non-payment?
Thus we the tax-payers pay the bills to "in-prison" the dads, while also dishing out supplemental welfare to the moms and kids..
14
posted on
01/15/2007 2:05:25 PM PST
by
VRWCTexan
(History has a long memory - but still repeats itself)
To: wolfcreek
What about the WOMAN taking some birth control responsibility??? Hmmmmm?
Oh, BTW, I'm a WOMAN! and I've known several who don't use birth control because they think its the man's responsibility!
First thing I told my son when he became a teenager is DON'T believe a female when she says she is protected. YOU make sure you are cause females lie! He is in his early 30's and I STILL remind him of this from time to time!
15
posted on
01/15/2007 2:05:46 PM PST
by
proudofthesouth
(Mao said that power comes at the point of a rifle; I say FREEDOM does.)
To: Arizona Carolyn
"Why should the wife (or girlfriend) be left to work and care for the kids and the husband get off scott free? Answer: They shouldn't." I agree. I also believe that single mothers should be held more accountable for the way child support dollars are spent, with similar civil and criminal penalties when that money is utilized for other than its intended purposes.
16
posted on
01/15/2007 2:05:56 PM PST
by
Joe 6-pack
(Voted Free Republic's Most Eligible Bachelor: 2006. Love them Diebold machines.)
To: Natural Law
Boy, I must have hit a nerve. Guilty conscience? Boy, you must be an arrogant jerk. Narrow mind?
17
posted on
01/15/2007 2:06:03 PM PST
by
TChris
(The Democratic Party: A sewer into which is emptied treason, inhumanity and barbarism - O. Morton)
To: Arizona Carolyn
I agree, men need to support they're children but realistically, things happen whether you are in an intact family or not. There should be recourse for those who fall into extreme bad luck.
18
posted on
01/15/2007 2:06:18 PM PST
by
tiki
To: bannie
"Pay it on time"
Yassuh, I'll pay waterever Uncle Sugar tells me to, Massuh!
"a roofer who owed $240,581."
"Your child has to eat every day..."
Oh, PLEASE!!
Evidently they are eating about 12 meals a day 15 days a week if it takes a quarter of a million bucks to feed them.
Where in the hell do you expect a roofer to get a quarter of a million dollars?
You sick people are advocating making it a crime for men to have children outside their home and be poor.
19
posted on
01/15/2007 2:09:12 PM PST
by
L98Fiero
(A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
To: proudofthesouth
What about the idea that when two people create a child that child becomes their number one priority until it is an adult. That means you support the child before you move out, get a girl or boy friend, a new spouse, additional kids, a red Corvette, hair plugs or breast implants, join a gym or pay for a dating service. If you have to sleep in a phone booth and flip burgers or shovel sh*t 18 hours a day to make it happen, so be it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-331 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson