[redgirlinabluestate]

But he should have been out there on every other media venue of consequence, stating the facts, calmly informing the sheeple of the dangers of losing this war, in his logical, levelheaded way.

I agree. He has been woefully under-utilized. Winning the propaganda war is half the battle and he is such a valuable asset.

Freeper Snugs asked how many people would have actually listened to the VP. Well, if winning the war necessitates our ability to sustain the American people's will to win, then I actually think he SHOULD go on shows like Oprah. How can it hurt? Just the fact that he goes on her show would be widely covered and his message would be conveyed to that many more Americans who normally tune him out.

[snugs]

I agree in some ways but I still feel that the MSM have done such a good hatchet job that anything he says will be interpreted by many as having alternative agenda and the MSM will immediately show this interpretation whether on TV shows or newspaper referring to the interview(s).

And those who have not heard of him would ignore him as being old and irrelevant.

[benjaminjjones]

he SHOULD go on shows like Oprah

I disagree. There might be more coverage, but would it be positive?

I could see the RATs and the MSM trying to make such an appearance degenerate into something like the current DONALD-ROSIE turd hurling contest.

You have to draw the line somewhere. I draw the line at shows like Oprah and The View.

He should maintain SOME level of dignity, if not personally, then for the Office of the Vice President.

Freshmen Republicans however, at least in the House, might need some rookie hazing and trial by fire to prove their loyalty and backbone.

Having to stand up to, face down, and stomp on, a liberal media powerhouse like Oprah would serve that purpose nicely.