Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christian leader rejects McCain
NewsNetDaily.com ^ | Januaru 13, 2007 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 01/13/2007 1:56:54 PM PST by Reagan Man

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-263 next last
To: stm

If the Nov 7 stay at home Republicans had gotten of their lazy asses and voted we might very well not be in this mess.


8
I have a better one. "If the Republicans we elected the last couple of elections had gotten off their lazy asses and voted the way they should have in congress we would not be in this mess."


101 posted on 01/13/2007 6:12:44 PM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dawn53
I would not vote for McCain in a primary. But if it were Hillary and him on the ticket...I still believe that there is a "worse" of two evils...and McCain would not be the worst person in the office in that case.


You definitely do not know McCrazy. He is the worse of any two evils. He would be the worst person, defeatocrat or Republican to elect for the presidency.
102 posted on 01/13/2007 6:22:35 PM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel
Social conservatives are the largest constituency in the GOP, and have been for the last 30 years! I'd say roughly 50%-60% of Republicans are social conservatives. The GOP is nothing without them. Strict fiscal conservatives constitute maybe 25% of the GOP voting block. The rest is the GOP`s moderate-centrist-liberal voter block.

Over the last six years Pres Bush, a social conservative btw, and other powerbrokers in the GOP Congressional leadership moved the GOP leftward on domestic policy. Fiscal conservatives did't like it and for most part, social conservatives didn't like it either. You see, most social conservatives are by nature supportive of fiscal conservatism. Conservatives in general didn't support the leftward shift that Bush has accomplished on domestic issues since taking office. Bush`s liberal spending habits, his expansion of the federal bureaucracy, enlarging the welfare state with his "free" drugs for seniors, doubling the education budget and promotion of liberal immigration reform, AKA. amnesty, has turned off most conservatives.

Think about it. Why do you think Republicans were handed such an historic loss on November 7th 2006? Bush, Frist, Hastert and the rest, ignored their conservative base, and the GOP paid the price. If Bush&Company hadn't ignored their conservative base, Republican candidates who lost might have been able to better weather the gathering storm over Iraq, and held onto power. Instead, the entire GOP leadership failed their constituency and the Democrats won.

Unless Republicans want to see the same results in 2008, that we had after the 2006 election, ALL conservatives best wake up and get behind the best candidate available. Right now ALL the candidates who are in the top tier have questionable records. Only Newt Gingrich represents Reagan conservatism. And that northeast liberal, Rudy Giuliani, is not the answer either.

103 posted on 01/13/2007 6:26:36 PM PST by Reagan Man (Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: tutstar; trillabodilla; del4hope; duckbutt; Fiddlstix; somniferum; WKUHilltopper; kimmie7; ...

Baptist Ping


104 posted on 01/13/2007 6:44:40 PM PST by WKB (Rudy V Hillary= There is no lessor of two liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

McCain may be Republican, but he's no conservative.


105 posted on 01/13/2007 6:48:28 PM PST by airborne (Elect an Airborne Ranger,Vietnam Veteran for President ! Duncan Hunter 2008!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
In case that you didn't get what Dr. Dobson was saying. He was speaking for himself, and was in no way trying to tell you where to place your X.

If it wasn't for people like James Dobson and other conservative Evangelicals there would have been no President Ronald Reagan. You just might want to watch who you are calling an idiot.
106 posted on 01/13/2007 7:00:37 PM PST by Coldwater Creek (The TERRORIST are the ones who won the midterm elections!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
Dr. Dobson is not going to endorse anyone. Focus on the Family would loose their tax shelter.
107 posted on 01/13/2007 7:02:42 PM PST by Coldwater Creek (The TERRORIST are the ones who won the midterm elections!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

bump


108 posted on 01/13/2007 7:03:36 PM PST by tutstar (Baptist Ping list - freepmail me to get on or off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel

Again, there would be no conservative Republican party without the Evangelicals. Pure and Simple!!


109 posted on 01/13/2007 7:04:16 PM PST by Coldwater Creek (The TERRORIST are the ones who won the midterm elections!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker
they will learn the hardddd way, just ask Speaker Pelosi,Senate Leader Reid and Fat Ted

None of those is one whit worse than McCain.

110 posted on 01/13/2007 7:07:27 PM PST by Sloth (The GOP is to DemonRats in politics as Michael Jackson is to Jeffrey Dahmer in babysitting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Your category is called "social conservatives," I think.

Actually, my views encompass all of the Republican categories that are actually conservative. :-)

111 posted on 01/13/2007 7:11:08 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Circumstances are the fire by which the mettle of men is tried.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

ok


112 posted on 01/13/2007 7:16:00 PM PST by italianquaker (Democrats its time to fish or cut bait, no more blaming Prez Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: packrat35; Brilliant; Kieri; tkathy; pointsal; TommyDale; zook; WestVirginiaRebel; All
But you will be voting for hillary clinton, packrat35....

If it's Giuliani or McCain vs. hillary clinton in '08 and you vote 3rd party or sit out the election, you will be placing a de facto vote for hillary clinton. Period.

To think otherwise is delusional.

To fail to think through the consequences of placing a de facto vote for hillary clinton is smugly self-serving.

Ironically, it is also self-defeating.

You may not care that the clintons were the proximate cause of 9/11. You may not care that the clintons rape and otherwise abuse power.

But I suspect you care about your religious freedom... in which case I can only assume those of you on the Religious Right who, like Dr. Dobson, would so cavalierly place a de facto vote for hillary clinton simply aren't aware of her view of Evangelicals... or her plans for them....

It would be wise to educate yourself about what the clintons think of you and what they intend to do to you before you so nonchalantly place that de facto vote for the lovely couple.

WHY THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT MUST MOBILIZE AGAINST HILLARY:
CLINTON CONFLATES EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS AND ISLAMO-FASCIST TERRORISTS


AFTERWORD: A Note to the Religious Right


JIM TOWEY DEBUNKS KUO BOOK
BOOK ANOTHER CLINTON-SIMON SCHUSTER MACHINE EFFORT
TO MARGINALIZE EVANGELICALS, SUPPRESS TURNOUT


What's black and white and read all over and is more self-destructive than pre-9/11 thinking?
Pre-clinton thinking, that's what....
Putting doctrinal purity ahead of making sure a defective and dangerous clinton never again controls this country is pre-clinton thinking.
We no longer have the luxury of time or circumstance to massage our sensibilities, to indulge our indignations.
We will not survive another clinton. (We may yet not survive the first one.)



113 posted on 01/13/2007 8:10:42 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Nonsense. Right now it appears that either Edwards or Saddam Hussein Obama will beat Hillary.


114 posted on 01/13/2007 8:13:15 PM PST by TommyDale (If we don't put a stop to this global warming, we will all be dead in 10,000 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
I agree with you that the Ds may wise up and dump hillary. But my post is based on the stated hypothetical matchup.

TOP 10 REASONS TO DUMP HILLARY CLINTON ON NOVEMBER 7
(And she thinks New Yorkers should return her to office why?)



THE DECLINE OF HILLARY CLINTON: THE DYNAMICS
(SHE HAS ONLY ONE WAY TO GO. AND IT ISN'T UP.)


THE POLITICS OF DUMPING HILLARY


'HILLARY'S BIGGEST PROBLEM... SHE'S OLD NEWS'



115 posted on 01/13/2007 8:21:55 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
McCain was a hero, a long time ago. Nowadays he's a loon, bereft of his senses, missing a goodly chunk of his attic insulation, the dullest knife in the drawer.

Lo, how the mighty have fallen.

116 posted on 01/13/2007 8:25:14 PM PST by LibKill (ENOUGH! Take the warning labels off everything and let Saint Darwin do his job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

I'm not going to let the hatred and fear of a Hillary Presidency force me to vote for a McCain or Giuliani under any circumstances. It is up to the Republican Party to nominate a uniting candidate to defeat the Democrats, not blackmail us into voting for a compromise liberal RINO.


117 posted on 01/13/2007 8:26:17 PM PST by TommyDale (If we don't put a stop to this global warming, we will all be dead in 10,000 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Dr. Dobson believes in Evolution, "If the foundations be destoryed, What shall the Righteous do!:

If you think its bad now, how about then
American Covenant Seminar 2.5

118 posted on 01/13/2007 8:35:23 PM PST by netvictory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

I believe he claims to have said these things, but I don't believe he actually said them. Sort of like how DUmmies make up stories about their encounters with FReepers or some random right wing person.


119 posted on 01/13/2007 8:43:19 PM PST by Mark-in-Kentucky (Check out my sites, www.spacebuffs.com and www.ageofantiquity.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

I don't give a Godd**n. I hate mccain with every fiber of my being as much as I hate hillary. I am from TN so I know the clinton bloodsuckers before the rest of the country did. If the Rebulican party picks mccain, they are committing election suicide.

I am not alone in this feeling. Continuing to stick your head in the sand will not make mccain any better. I refuse to be held responsible for the stupidity of the Republican party any longer. I have done my bit in my 45 years on this planet. I have always been a Republican. I voted for President Reagan in 1980 with my very first vote at 19 years old. I voted for Corker in TN in 2006 (who was not my first choice) and he won the only close contest for the Republicans in the Senate.

But NOTHING in this world will get me to vote for mccain. Not even a suitcase full of cash. Can I make this more clear?


120 posted on 01/13/2007 8:46:19 PM PST by packrat35 (guest worker/day worker=SlaveMart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-263 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson