Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: packrat35; Brilliant; Kieri; tkathy; pointsal; TommyDale; zook; WestVirginiaRebel; All
But you will be voting for hillary clinton, packrat35....

If it's Giuliani or McCain vs. hillary clinton in '08 and you vote 3rd party or sit out the election, you will be placing a de facto vote for hillary clinton. Period.

To think otherwise is delusional.

To fail to think through the consequences of placing a de facto vote for hillary clinton is smugly self-serving.

Ironically, it is also self-defeating.

You may not care that the clintons were the proximate cause of 9/11. You may not care that the clintons rape and otherwise abuse power.

But I suspect you care about your religious freedom... in which case I can only assume those of you on the Religious Right who, like Dr. Dobson, would so cavalierly place a de facto vote for hillary clinton simply aren't aware of her view of Evangelicals... or her plans for them....

It would be wise to educate yourself about what the clintons think of you and what they intend to do to you before you so nonchalantly place that de facto vote for the lovely couple.

WHY THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT MUST MOBILIZE AGAINST HILLARY:
CLINTON CONFLATES EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS AND ISLAMO-FASCIST TERRORISTS


AFTERWORD: A Note to the Religious Right


JIM TOWEY DEBUNKS KUO BOOK
BOOK ANOTHER CLINTON-SIMON SCHUSTER MACHINE EFFORT
TO MARGINALIZE EVANGELICALS, SUPPRESS TURNOUT


What's black and white and read all over and is more self-destructive than pre-9/11 thinking?
Pre-clinton thinking, that's what....
Putting doctrinal purity ahead of making sure a defective and dangerous clinton never again controls this country is pre-clinton thinking.
We no longer have the luxury of time or circumstance to massage our sensibilities, to indulge our indignations.
We will not survive another clinton. (We may yet not survive the first one.)



113 posted on 01/13/2007 8:10:42 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: Mia T

Nonsense. Right now it appears that either Edwards or Saddam Hussein Obama will beat Hillary.


114 posted on 01/13/2007 8:13:15 PM PST by TommyDale (If we don't put a stop to this global warming, we will all be dead in 10,000 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T

I don't give a Godd**n. I hate mccain with every fiber of my being as much as I hate hillary. I am from TN so I know the clinton bloodsuckers before the rest of the country did. If the Rebulican party picks mccain, they are committing election suicide.

I am not alone in this feeling. Continuing to stick your head in the sand will not make mccain any better. I refuse to be held responsible for the stupidity of the Republican party any longer. I have done my bit in my 45 years on this planet. I have always been a Republican. I voted for President Reagan in 1980 with my very first vote at 19 years old. I voted for Corker in TN in 2006 (who was not my first choice) and he won the only close contest for the Republicans in the Senate.

But NOTHING in this world will get me to vote for mccain. Not even a suitcase full of cash. Can I make this more clear?


120 posted on 01/13/2007 8:46:19 PM PST by packrat35 (guest worker/day worker=SlaveMart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T

I don't have any problem with Giuliani. It's McCain I won't vote for.

Obviously, I'm hoping it won't be McCain v. Clinton, but if it is, I'm not sure what point there is to voting at all. McCain is as bad as Hillary.


138 posted on 01/14/2007 6:02:18 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson