Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If you're a Republican, be worried, very worried (Lowry)
NRO ^ | Rich "half & half" Lowry

Posted on 01/12/2007 10:57:41 AM PST by slowhand520

Friday, January 12, 2007

If you're a Republican, be worried, very worried... [Rich Lowry]

...because Rahm Emanuel is very shrewd, per this Ignatius column. Emanuel is focusing on what would probably be the most politically wise way for Dems to try to stop the surge:

Rather than try to restrict funds for the troops (which he sees as a political blunder that would delight Republicans), Emanuel instead favors a proposal by Rep. John Murtha to set strict standards for readiness — which would make it hard to finance the troop surge in Iraq without beefing up the military as a whole. The idea is to position the Democrats as friends of the military, even as they denounce Bush's Iraq policy.

Posted at 12:23 PM


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 01/12/2007 10:57:44 AM PST by slowhand520
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: slowhand520

I'm a Republican and I'm not worried.


2 posted on 01/12/2007 10:59:03 AM PST by Princip. Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slowhand520
which would make it hard to finance the troop surge in Iraq without beefing up the military as a whole.

So what's the downside?

3 posted on 01/12/2007 10:59:28 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Pelosi, the call was for Comity, not Comedy. But thanks for the laughs. StarKisses, NVA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slowhand520

I'm an American...and I AM worried!


4 posted on 01/12/2007 10:59:53 AM PST by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slowhand520

What me worry?


5 posted on 01/12/2007 11:00:00 AM PST by Ben Mugged (Always cheat; always win. The only unfair fight is the one you lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slowhand520

Lowry is such a whiney little bitch.

If the Rats vote to create strict standards for readiness, they will also be on the hook to fund these proposals.

I hope they do this, it will mean increasing the size of the military which is far too small for current tasks and threats.


6 posted on 01/12/2007 11:01:13 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slowhand520

"set strict standards for readiness..."


According to the Clintonistas, we are ready to fight two major wars in different parts of the globe. And that was before Bush expanded the size of the military.


7 posted on 01/12/2007 11:01:24 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slowhand520
Here, Lowry shows his ignorance of the military.

I guess he assumes that our services will support anyone who throws money at them, and dont know the difference between actual support and shameless pandering.

Lowry needs to learn that the military know who their friends are, and there is nothing to fear.

8 posted on 01/12/2007 11:01:43 AM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

Well said, PD.


9 posted on 01/12/2007 11:04:26 AM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: slowhand520
It'll all be moot after Mahmoud detonates that nuke from a container ship off New York Harbor.

At least then we'll get to finish the job once and for all.

10 posted on 01/12/2007 11:05:47 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Lowry is such a whiney little bitch.

Yup......A Metrosexual type.....

11 posted on 01/12/2007 11:05:51 AM PST by Cold Heat ("Ward!.........Go easy on the beaver"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: slowhand520

The underlying article clearly indicates that the 'rats want the War to be a failure so that they can become the dominant political party. Hence their de facto alliance with the enemy who is killing our soldiers. Dead American soldiers will translate into 'rat seats in Congress and a 'rat President.

If they actually cared about our troops at all, then they would either support the war or cutoff funding. Neither helps them politically, so they are adopting a strategy of isolating the President and doing everything possible to make sure we lose.


12 posted on 01/12/2007 11:09:24 AM PST by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
At least then we'll get to finish the job once and for all.

That job will not be done until the enemy within is also "dealt" with

13 posted on 01/12/2007 11:09:38 AM PST by clamper1797 (Per caritate viduaribus orphanibusque sed prime viduaribus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: slowhand520

Rush talking about this now


14 posted on 01/12/2007 11:10:18 AM PST by slowhand520
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

Rush just said the same thing!


15 posted on 01/12/2007 11:12:44 AM PST by mtnwmn (mtnwmn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: slowhand520
Before Traitor Murtha and Crew get and legislation proposed, let alone passed, the troop levels in Iraq will already reflect the surge. The militias will be disarmed by threat or by actual combat. Baghdad will be under martial law. Sectarian violence will have waned. There will still be the daily suicide bomber to fill the television screens but the "civil war" will be gone.

Let the Dimocraps propose strengthening the military overall. Then let the Republicans outbid them. Let's take turns until we're back to 18 active divisions. Let's see which party's base abandons them first. Some of the Democrats were elected on "bring the troops home" platforms. How will the people that voted for them support boosting the military? Not very well if at all.

16 posted on 01/12/2007 11:14:34 AM PST by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797

We will have to strike before a week or so passes or the "enemy within" will start to retreat again, like they did after 911.


17 posted on 01/12/2007 11:15:38 AM PST by SWEETSUNNYSOUTH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: slowhand520

And how much time did Mr. Lowry spend bashing the President and the republicans for the past year or so?


18 posted on 01/12/2007 11:20:59 AM PST by OldFriend (THE PRESS IS AN EVIL FOR WHICH THERE IS NO REMEDY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

Exactly...the military knows who their friends are in DC and it ain't the rats.


19 posted on 01/12/2007 11:23:28 AM PST by mystery-ak (My Son, My Soldier, My Hero........God Speed Jonathan......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SWEETSUNNYSOUTH

Why wait ... no time like the present


20 posted on 01/12/2007 11:33:03 AM PST by clamper1797 (Per caritate viduaribus orphanibusque sed prime viduaribus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson