Posted on 01/11/2007 8:13:33 PM PST by Howlin
Thank you, thank you!
The video from WRAL is more than what was on the '60 Minutes' version, but the segment with Stahl, the parents, and in particular, Mrs. Evans, is the same snippet that I viewed earlier. Mama Evans is right, Nifong did pick the wrong people to tangle with, and he will pay for it, in some measure, for the rest of his life. He changed those boys' and their families' lives forever, and now, his life (and probably his family's lives) will change, too. [Mrs. Nifong, and Nifong Jr. will be so happy about that! /s]
Any updates on the sexual harassment complaint against ADA C. Destine Couch?
Ashley Cannon, Please Speak Up
http://www.webcommentary.com/asp/ShowArticle.asp?id=gaynorm&date=070102
Love that tagline! "Praise the Lord and pass the hammunition!"
The victim is going to hell in a handbasket all by her own choices.
I don't remember what happened to Tawana Brawley in the end. If nothing else, she either had to change her name or live in perpetual infamy.
Unless the Duke "victim" gets the light and sees religion, her life is going to be one unhappy mess, and probably not a very long one. She does seem to have one advantage over Tawana Brawley--her name isn't becoming a byword.
it is - i do not ever wish to cross her!
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Good for you, Mrs. Evans.
Now that's a mom.
Heh!
I know David Freedman, he is an upright guy. He represents a number of attorneys charged with violations of ethics before the NC State Bar. He is with a relatively small firm here in Winston-Salem. I don't envy him having to represent Nifong, but then again, he agreed to the representation. He is also representing Zach Bynum, who has been disbarred and is facing charges for taking upwards of 2-3 million dollars of client money. I had the "joy" of representing a bank where he deposited/withdrew some of this money in a case brought by a victimized party.
It seems to me that Nifong's only hope of avoiding disaster in this case is to stack the jury with people who don't care about the evidence and are just determined to find the defendants guilty. If he tries that, can the defense lawyers stop him, or are they limited to a certain number of challenges?
Be sure to remind him that Nifong was quite clear about it: you don't need an attorney if you're not guilty.
:-)
Nothing that I know of....but it's Friday. LOL
Thank you.
heh-heh-heh
Wonder what the odds are there will be a info dump this afternoon?
Will something "leak" once again re-enforcing the delusional belief of those who just "Know they are guilty of something"
Or another leak designed to take the focus off of the Duke case?
We were discussing this at work (in Durham) this morning.
Our consensus was that he knows if he drops all the charges at once, he's toast. Instead he's setting up the 'victim' with all these new versions of events, thus letting her take the rap.
Future Nifong Quote: "The law required us to take her seriously, how were we to know she was a nutjob. Sorry boys, here's your life back."
Must read comments:
http://media.www.dukechronicle.com/media/storage/paper884/news/2007/01/12/News/Admins.Uphold.Free.Speech.In.Time.Of.attack-2628774.shtml?sourcedomain=www.dukechronicle.com&MIIHost=media.collegepublisher.com
http://www.dukechronicle.com/home/index.cfm?event=displayArticleComments&ustory_id=78cee2b3-6850-4328-9fba-ee0ab7530d0b#83e8a360-da8b-4b12-81be-1782292feab8
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.