Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Star Traveler
It may be that the surge is for the coming attack on Iran. But, of course, no one would want to say that right now.

Nice rhetoric but unrealistic. A ground offensive against Iran would require hundreds of thousands of soldiers, which we don't have. Iran knows this and this is why nutjob keeps running his mouth.

20 posted on 01/11/2007 11:18:11 AM PST by OldCorps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: OldCorps

You said -- "A ground offensive against Iran would require hundreds of thousands of soldiers, which we don't have. Iran knows this and this is why nutjob keeps running his mouth."

No, I was thinking of the kind of attack that the Israelis said that they were going to do, if necessary -- using nuclear bunker busters. Fly in and fly out. And the U.S. would probably do the same. That's the attack that is coming.

And the surge would be to hold the line in Iraq, against the Iranians, in case they have any foolish ideas afterwards.

Regards,
Star Traveler


30 posted on 01/11/2007 11:24:22 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: OldCorps

I still believe airpower is the answer in Iran.


54 posted on 01/14/2007 8:41:28 AM PST by Mr. Silverback ("Safe sex? Not until they develop a condom for the heart."--Freeper All the Best)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson