Major Strategic Shifts
Iraqis Are in the Lead in Ensuring Success U.S. in Support Role
Place the responsibility for success on the Iraqis
Recognize and expect that sectarian violence must be addressed by Iraqis
Encourage Iraqis to reach national reconciliation
Urge Iraqi Government to serve Iraqis in an impartial way
The Primary Mission Is Helping Iraqis Provide Security to the Population
Help Iraqis provide greater levels of security in Baghdad in order to enable political and economic progress
Help Iraqis create the security environment in which political deals needed to sustain security gains can be made
Bolster Iraqi capabilities and transfer responsibility to able units as part of this effort
Moderates Will Be Vigorously Supported in their Battle with Violent Extremists
Counter extremist portrayalof Iraqs conflict as Sunni vs. Shia, rather than moderates vs. extremists
Recognize and act upon the reality that the United States has a national interest in seeing moderates succeed
Build and sustain strategic partnerships with moderate Shia, Sunnis, and Kurds
We Will Diversify our Political and Economic Effort in Iraq to Achieve Our Goals
Increase attention to developments outside of the International Zone emphasize flexibility
Help Iraqi provincial governments deliver to their constituents and interact with Baghdad
Extend the political and economic influence through the expansion of our civilian effort
We Will Further Integrate Our Civil and Military Efforts
Harness all elements of national power; further augment joint civilian-military efforts throughout theater
Resource at levels that assume a resilient enemy and realistic assessment of Iraqi capacity over the next 12 months
Embedding Our Iraq Strategy in a Regional Approach is Vital to Success
Iraq is a regional and international challenge
Intensify GOI and USG efforts to expand regional and international help, counter Iran and Syria meddling
Invigorate diplomatic efforts to improve the regional context
We Must Maintain and Expand Our Capabilities for the Long War
Acknowledge that succeeding in Iraq is the immediate challenge, but it is not the last challenge
Ensure we have adequate national capabilities to fight the long war, on the military and civilian side
http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/iraq/2007/iraq-strategy011007.pdf
Thanks for posting that. Here is another link to a PDF on the Q&A today for the speech tonight for those interested.
http://media.newsbusters.org/media/2007-01-10IraqQA.pdf
Preview of tonight's speech [Mona Charen] Based on a just-completed White House background briefing, it looks like the Presidents new Iraq strategy to be unveiled tonight looks promising.
The Administration recognizes a lot of what has gone wrong, for example, that is was unrealistic to assume that political progress could be made while the security situation remained so ghastly. The new emphasis is on security first. Five new American brigades will be sent to Baghdad to work with new Iraqi brigades securing the capital block by block. Unclear whether this will be sufficient force. Rules of engagement also to change so that there will be no more areas off limits to American forces.
The President also plans to ask for a larger army a little late and so necessary! It will be interesting to see how the Democrats in Congress handle that one. All that talk of supporting the troops. . .
Possible problem areas: the strategy still depends heavily on Malikis bona fides. They believe his heart is the right place but he has suffered from lack of capabilities. Thats a gamble. There is also a regional component to the new strategy that seems to rely on another push for Israeli/Palestinian cooperation (Rice is traveling to Middle East within the week). That sounds like Baker/Hamilton bunk, but lets see what she says.
Still, most of it sounds exactly right.
Posts #41, #52, and #56 are great. That's all the farther I've gotten...reading like the mad dog bi+@# that I am- when I thought of all you other dogs ; )