Trial will debate 2nd Amendment rights

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | January 6, 2007 | Bob Unruh

[looscnnn]

Ping

[lowbridge]

then let the judge rule whether or not the Bill of Rights can be discussed in a federal courtroom these days.

Oh, God forbid! /sarcasm

[Red Badger]

Hollis Wayne Fincher,60....

[stm]

Hey retard, when the Second Amendment was written, there were no such thing as machine guns. If you want to own a machine gun, fine. Drop the four grand it takes for a Class III license. If you don't and you get caught then take your punishment and have a steaming hot cup of STFU.

[stevio]

Good, let's get this out in the open.

[Last Laugh]

"Yes, Hollis Wayne Fincher goes on trial on January 8th – but so does our Constitution, our Liberty and our right to own firearms. If Mr. Fincher loses this battle, we all lose," he said

I wish him the best of luck, but if a liberal court causes a loss, WE don't lose, and the second stands.

The government can pass any law they want, and I WILL STAND by the second amendment.

[frogjerk]

The motion from the federal prosecution indicated the government believes Fincher wants to argue the gun charges are unconstitutional, but it is asking that the court keep such decisions out of the jury's hands.

FEDS: "In addition to not being able to argue the 2nd Amendment, we are petioning that the jury system be passed over as well..."

[Last Laugh]

Drop the four grand it takes for a Class III license. If you don't and you get caught then take your punishment and have a steaming hot cup of STFU.

Needing a license is in itelf, unconstitutional.

[stevio]

Hey retard, when the Second Amendment was written, there were no such thing as machine guns.

Really? Where is that exemption written?

[TalonDJ]

Hey retard, when the Second Amendment was written, there were no such thing as machine guns.

When it was written it was legal under it for citizens to own CANNONS.

I assume by your 'logic' you think everything should be baned or highly restricted except muskets.

[Just sayin]

Are automatic weapons properly defined as arms? If not, please explain.

[jrp]

So you believe the 2A only applies to blackpowder firearms?

[beltfed308]

Hey retard, when the Second Amendment was written, there were no such thing as machine guns. If you want to own a machine gun, fine. Drop the four grand it takes for a Class III license. If you don't and you get caught then take your punishment and have a steaming hot cup of STFU.

Or this: Hey retard, when the First Amendment was written, there were no such thing as television. If you want to own a television fine. Drop the four grand it takes for a FCC license. If you don't and you get caught then take your punishment and have a steaming hot cup of STFU.

[frogjerk]

American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source
in·fringe
v. in·fringed, in·fring·ing, in·fring·es

v. tr.

1. To transgress or exceed the limits of; violate: infringe a contract; infringe a patent.

2. Obsolete To defeat; invalidate.

[Red Badger]

Arms are arms. No delineations in the constitution between big and little, fully automatic or semi, just arms...........Where's your howitzer? Jefferson might ask if he were to be brought back today............

[Repeal The 17th]

bump

[labette]

Hey stm! When the First Amendment was written there was no such thing as the internet. If you want your opinion to reach more people than the town crier, Send four grand to the ministry of truth for your class III free speech permit...

"If you don't and you get caught then take your punishment and....."Well, you get the idea.

[TalonDJ]

In many European countries you need to get a license to own a TV or a frikin RADIO. By this genius' logic everything invented after 1776 would be subject to federal licensing.

[holymoly]

Hey retard, when the Second Amendment was written, there were no such thing as machine guns.

Sophistry.

There were also no such things as semi-automatic rifles, bolt-action rifles, smokeless powder, jacketed bullets, etc., etc.