Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/10/2007 11:17:57 AM PST by slowhand520
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: slowhand520

1994, his first run for political office. It will lose him a few conservative votes. It will win him just as many or more mushy moderate votes. Let's see if anyone brings it out in the primaries.


2 posted on 01/10/2007 11:22:13 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9IJUkYUbvI&eurl=


3 posted on 01/10/2007 11:23:52 AM PST by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

bump for later... (Curse you, company firewall!)


7 posted on 01/10/2007 11:30:13 AM PST by RebelBanker (May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520

I wonder if his "tar-baby" statement will hurt him?.......Nah...


9 posted on 01/10/2007 11:30:50 AM PST by colorcountry (Remember: Everyone seems normal until you get to know them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520

Two quotes from the video:

"I believe that abortion should be safe and legal in this country."

"I believe that since Roe V. Wade has been the law for 20 years that we should sustain and support it and I sustain and support that law and the right of a woman to make that choice."

- Mitt Romney


10 posted on 01/10/2007 11:30:52 AM PST by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520

Romney will be a strong, effective spokesman for the GOP. I think he will wear well with voters and look very leaderly and capable next to the over-exposed, empty-suit celebrity candidates like Hillary and Abomination. But a big part of his attractiveness as a candidate is that he has a resume and some amount of name recognition to match his political abilities.

But some people will not get past the fact that to run and win as senator or governor in a liberal state like Massachusetts you have to make some concessions. You will not advance a conservative agenda one inch in a state like Massachusetts if you deny political reality and run as a doctrinaire conservative. I have full confidence he will run as a pretty solid conservative when running nationally precisely because he came right to govern after his 1994 campaign for Senate and later for governor.

So many conservatives just focus narrowly and solely on his abortion position to claim he's some sort of liberal that he's not, a position which has evolved to become pro-life by the way based on some studying he did (most thinking adults find certain of their positions evolving over time), and ignore the other ways in which he governed conservatively including of course leading the charge against gay marriage.

But the "cut off your nose to spite your face" crowd will ignore all the ways he governed as a conservative to focus on the few areas where he had to adapt to Massachusetts' political reality. They really are so deluded that they can't see how self-destructive they are. These same thoughtless, non-pragmatic types gave us Clinton 1 and seem intent on giving us Clinton Part Deux.


11 posted on 01/10/2007 11:30:57 AM PST by MikeA (Nancy Pelosi: The Speaker of the News Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520

So much for the people who say he is more conservative than Rudy... at least I trust Rudy will not waffle in the WOT, I don't trust Romney won't waffle, because he tells people what they want to hear.


13 posted on 01/10/2007 11:34:47 AM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520
Again it surfaces...

Okay. - Mitt doesn't have a snowball's chance in Hell of winning, and I'll put up twelve kegs of Bud to back up that seemingly bold - to some - forecast.
You decide how to share them, but if you want in you must each be willing to buy me one case of Bud. Deal?

I have space for a lot of cases in my hanger, so jump in and be counted!


21 posted on 01/10/2007 11:38:31 AM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520
I would never in a million years support this guy for President. I don't care how much money his "Friends" send him.

Mitt and Kerry are from the same neck of the woods. They will say anything that they need to get where they want to be. Flip and Flop

As far as "this was a long time ago" apology, that is pure garbage. This guy is pure snake oil.

31 posted on 01/10/2007 11:50:25 AM PST by Afronaut (Press 2 for English - Thanks Mr. President !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520
Romney is our John Kerry. He's a flip-flopper from MA who will say anything to get elected. As a conservative, I won't vote to put a liberal into office, even if that liberal is a Republican.

We have another option...



Duncan Hunter on the Issues

Freepmail me to join the Duncan Hunter Pinglist
44 posted on 01/10/2007 11:58:11 AM PST by Antoninus ( Rudy McRomney as the GOP nominee = President Hillary. Why else do you think the media loves them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520

That's not going to harm Romney's chances! That's been known for some time. It will only be meaningful to those who already do not support Romney. It seems to turn them on - and that's why we see people like you posting this stuff over and over.


58 posted on 01/10/2007 12:10:10 PM PST by Sunsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520
Why Mitt Romney Will Never Be President?

As the Democrats look upon this video of a then political neophyte who appears attractive, articulate, and sincere, they will draw the opposite conclusion.

Being good in a televised debate is worth a lot more in a general election than fastidious ideological consistency.

146 posted on 01/10/2007 1:13:43 PM PST by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520

Wow. Very interesting....thanks for the post.


173 posted on 01/10/2007 1:47:27 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520

Because Hillary will be elected by the American people in 2008. After she is elected there will be no more elections.


176 posted on 01/10/2007 2:04:59 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson