Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US sending stealth fighters to S Korea
news.com.au ^ | 10 January 2007

Posted on 01/10/2007 2:50:09 AM PST by Aussie Dasher

THE United States is sending between 15 and 24 radar-evading Stealth fighters to South Korea this month, the US military said today, amid increasing speculation over a second North Korean nuclear test.

"One squadron of F-117 Nighthawk Stealth fighters will be deployed this month,'' said Kim Yong-kyu, a spokesman for US Forces Korea. One squadron of fighters has between 15 and 24 aircraft.

"This is a routine deployment,'' he said, adding that the move had nothing to do with any particular threat.

He declined to give further details, including where and for how long the fighters will be deployed. Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico, where the fighters are based, said in a web posting that the fighters left earlier this week for South Korea.

General B B Bell, the commander of US forces in South Korea, said yesterday he believed North Korea would test a second nuclear bomb at some time in the future, following its first test on October 9.

"Should North Korea attack the South in any way, the combined forces command will respond and we will win quickly and we will win decisively,'' he said.

General Bell heads 29,000 US troops in the peninsula, supporting South Korea's 680,000-strong armed forces against any attack from the North's 1.1 million military.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.au ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: northkorea; nukes; southkorea; stealthfighters
Send whatever is needed to give the guy with the weirdo haircut the message!
1 posted on 01/10/2007 2:50:12 AM PST by Aussie Dasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
"This is a routine deployment,'' he said, adding that the move had nothing to do with any particular threat.

..we can expect the "nut job" to do his routine scurrying around the palace and issue threats, but this time he has to be wondering......

Doogle

2 posted on 01/10/2007 3:03:12 AM PST by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

All the services seem to be shifting towards WESPAC. I guess the Chinese give our forces better "training opportunities" like the Soviets did. /s


3 posted on 01/10/2007 3:06:37 AM PST by Thrownatbirth (.....when the sidewalks are safe for the little guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

"Send whatever is needed to give the guy with the weirdo haircut the message!"

Send Taiwan a fully loaded Ohio Class sub.

Let the Chinese deal with Chiahead.


4 posted on 01/10/2007 3:07:22 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz ("Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted." Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Didn't they retire the F-117s last year?

Seems I recall that being posted here on FR. It stands out in my mind 'cause I didn't like the idea of putting them out to pasture!

Hope this deployment is on the level and the Nighthawks are still on the hunt...
5 posted on 01/10/2007 3:09:46 AM PST by Bender2 (I am off politics until Nancy moves to Tehran... There to be taken straight to the ever after!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

It can't be all that stealth-y if the Aussies know about it.


6 posted on 01/10/2007 3:27:02 AM PST by sportutegrl (This thread is useless without pix.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
"I'm grad they sending stealth airpranes, I was getting ronry!!


7 posted on 01/10/2007 3:31:48 AM PST by stm (Believe 1% of what you hear in the lamestream media and take half of that with a grain of salt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stm

..there it is Kim..fire fire...no no over there...fire fire...Kim...stop peeing and pay attention...FIRE...

8 posted on 01/10/2007 3:47:36 AM PST by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
LOL.....

Hope those F-117's are loaded up with deadly Chia-seeking JDAM's.

;)

9 posted on 01/10/2007 4:06:05 AM PST by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Hmmmm.... it all ads up.

My brother's son-in-law - who is an Air Force F117 refueling specialist - was redeployed from a base in Turkey to Okinawa about two months ago.

At the time, I thought it was strange, and wondered if he wasn't assigned to the F117s any more. I suspect he will be in and out of South Korea on a regular basis.

10 posted on 01/10/2007 4:28:12 AM PST by Texas Jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Here's looking at you North Korea


11 posted on 01/10/2007 4:55:23 AM PST by Long Island Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

We send F117s to the ROK every year for a joint exercise. When I was there, I heard on the radio that Kim Jong Il would attack us if they landed. This was on the way back from watching them land. Nothing happened.

Every year, we do this exercise, and every year he bitches about it. Nothing changes.


12 posted on 01/10/2007 6:40:23 AM PST by ericc4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bender2

10 have been designated for "long term storage" (read that how you want), but they are to be kept in a serviceable condition and be able to return to flying status in a short amount of time. The rest are slated to begin transition into "long term storage" with the same provisos as the first 10 starting in '08.

This may change of course due to a few factors, two of which are $$'s to keep them flying and the rate at which HAFB starts getting the new infrastructure $$'s they need for the conversion to F-22's.

The F-117's may eventually be permanently retired, but it costs money to retire an aircraft, especially one that has a lot of classified material on/in it. When you add up the cost to declassify and demilitarize one aircraft and then multiply that by ~ 54 aircraft you run up against some money issues.

The aircraft can't be sent to DM as is because DM doesn't have the ability to secure the fleet. So there is a lot of hand wringing going on right now about what to do with them. Besides, they are still a highly capable/viable aircraft that can do some things the F-22 can't and won't.

Does that answer your question?;-)

Cheers,
SZ


13 posted on 01/10/2007 9:12:00 AM PST by SZonian (Fighting Caliphobia one detractor at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SZonian

Re: "Does that answer your question?"

You sure did, old sport...

Thanks!


14 posted on 01/10/2007 11:39:30 AM PST by Bender2 (I am off politics until Nancy moves to Tehran... There to be taken straight to the ever after!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bender2

You're welcome.

SZ


15 posted on 01/11/2007 7:18:14 AM PST by SZonian (Fighting Caliphobia one detractor at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson