Posted on 01/07/2007 9:13:54 AM PST by 13Sisters76
Nice of the media to report on it right before Chistmas. Everybody can forget about it and the media can claim to have covered it.
Oops, wrong administration....
The one question that Hillary Clinton should be asked at every whistle stop on her campaign is "What is Sandy Berger hiding?" She claims her time as First-Lady as part of the experience that prepared her for the Senate, ergo Presidency. So, she was there when the deals were being done. What's he hiding?
If this was a Republican theft, Sandy Berger would be a resident of Ft. Leavenworth by now. This issue cannot be brought up enough because future national security could be riding on the very papers that he destroyed.
Did Bill make a deal with Bin Laden to protect the US during his watch? Was his administration aware of an airplane plot scenario and didn't tell the incoming Bush people? What is so important that this man had to risk his fortune and future to protect the Clinton's?
bump
The mind boggles!!
Of course the Republicans could be holding their fire for the presidential campaign by using Berger's actions to tar the presumptive Democratic nominee, right? Nah! But hey, a guy can dream can't he?
Seriously, even if this were the 'game' I wouldn't be happy about it. This goes way beyond politics. Berger should have been charged, tried & convicted. Instead he was charged & pleaded out by a Justice Department that wasn't serious about doing its job.
SCISSORS? The guy couldn't use a diamond-cut shredder?
Strips cut by scissors may be reconstructed by a patient person, as scissor cuts have distinct characteristics, much like the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. But a diamond-cut shredder is much more difficult to reassemble.
Gee, I hope Sandy at least used blunt scissors, so he wouldn't injure himself while carrying them and running, should he happen to fall.
Thankfully, those operatives were far outweighed by a press more interested in journalism than anyone else’s political agenda.
Actually, they weren't. They were interested only in destroying Nixon. It looked like they were pursuing the story at all costs, but they would likely not have done so against a dim.
And we conservatives are NEVER going to get our country back until such time as we figure out how to deal effectively with the MSM!
The media is way too busy reporting on the horrible state of the economy.
[If you need an end-sarcasm tag for this, you're on the wrong forum.]
"What is so important that this man had to risk his fortune and future to protect the Clinton's?"
A more relevant question would be, why did Bush's Attorney General accept a plea bargain with a slap on the wrist for this traitor? And why does Bush refuse to pardon the two border patrolmen that were prosecuted so vigorusly for doing their jobs. They got 11yrs and 12yrs respectively in prison while this traitor got a slap on the wrist.
Bunk. Not this part of "most of us". I've got this great bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell to anyone who thought this was just a foolish mistake.
It's not just the MSM. It is the brain-dead fawning lazy uncaring spineless GOP.
This crime of Burger's is above an beyond the minutes of blank tape in the Nixon years. I think Sandy Burger should be strung up until he comes clean on just what was so important on the documents he stole. Accountability for his actions, why isn't this happening??
Because the mainstream media doesn't give a rat's butt, that's why.
As I understand it, he gets his security clearance back just in time to step into a position in the next potential democrat administration.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.